The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade Coffee
Abstract
Consumers’ buying behavior is not consistent with their positive attitude toward ethical products. In a survey of 808 Belgian respondents, the actual willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee was measured. It was found that the average price premium that the consumers were willing to pay for a fair‐trade label was 10%. Ten percent of the sample was prepared to pay the current price premium of 27% in Belgium. Fair‐trade lovers (11%) were more idealistic, aged between 31 and 44 years and less “conventional.” Fair‐trade likers (40%) were more idealistic but sociodemographically not significantly different from the average consumer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude—behaviour gap
Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/eb023532 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use
Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,334
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products
Li, S., & Kallas, Z. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105239 · Cited by 359
Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., & Battenfeld, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320 · Cited by 330
Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216 · Cited by 299
Varshneya, G., Pandey, S. K., & Das, G. (2017) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150916668620 · Cited by 214
Effectiveness of lifestyle health promotion interventions for nurses: a systematic review
Stanulewicz, N., Knox, E., Narayanasamy, M., Shivji, N., Khunti, K., & Blake, H. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010017 · Cited by 206
The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: a category-independent typology
Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P., & Weber, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.022 · Cited by 151
Frontal Brain Asymmetry and Willingness to Pay
Ramsøy, T. Z., Skov, M., Christensen, M. K., & Stahlhut, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00138 · Cited by 126
Jones, E. (2019) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121419849095 · Cited by 127
Caruana, R., Carrington, M. J., & Chatzidakis, A. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2444-9 · Cited by 123
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption
F. Burke, P., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0294 · Cited by 111
Berki-Kiss, D., & Menrad, K. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.026 · Cited by 90
Reputation building: beyond our control? Inferences in consumers' ethical perception formation
Brunk, K. H. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.317 · Cited by 79
California households' willingness to pay for ‘green’electronics
Saphores, J.-D. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560601048549 · Cited by 78
Strategic Assortment Decisions in Information-Intensive and Turbulent Environments
Dekimpe, M. G., Gielens, K., Raju, J., & Thomas, J. S. (2011) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.04.006 · Cited by 60
Eliciting willingness to pay for fairtrade products with information
Ruggeri, G., Corsi, S., & Nayga, R. M. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104066 · Cited by 49
Agroecological transitions: a mathematical perspective on a transdisciplinary problem
Ong, T. W. Y., & Liao, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00091 · Cited by 46
Smith, A., & Johns, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04318-1 · Cited by 48
Perceived Marketplace Influence and Consumer Ethical Action
Bret Leary, R., Vann, R. J., & Mittelstaedt, J. D. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12220 · Cited by 32
Rajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061772 · Cited by 25
The Well(s) of Knowledge: The Decoding of Sustainability Claims in the UK and in Greece
Alevizou, P., Oates, C., & McDonald, S. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7078729 · Cited by 23
Resistance to a social innovation: An analytic framework for problems of Fair Trade diffusion
Gurviez, P., & Sirieix, L. (2013) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570713487479 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- DE PELSMACKER, P., DRIESEN, L., & RAYP, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Affairs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 363-385
- ISSN
- 0022-0078 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2137868534
- Cited by
- 1,361
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 69.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
