CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,345Media Influence and HealthNarrative Theory and AnalysisEmpathy and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 210 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience

Mar, Raymond A., Oatley, Keith·2008·Perspectives on Psychological Science
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fiction literature has largely been ignored by psychology researchers because its only function seems to be entertainment, with no connection to empirical validity. We argue that literary narratives have a more important purpose. They offer models or simulations of the social world via abstraction, simplification, and compression. Narrative fiction also creates a deep and immersive simulative experience of social interactions for readers. This simulation facilitates the communication and understanding of social information and makes it more compelling, achieving a form of learning through experience. Engaging in the simulative experiences of fiction literature can facilitate the understanding of others who are different from ourselves and can augment our capacity for empathy and social inference.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Aristotle, 1987, Poetics
  2. Cortesi M., 1998, Besieged
  3. Dickens C., 1985, Hard times
  4. Eisenberg N., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 677
  5. Eliot G., 1883, The works of George Eliot. Standard Edition: Essays, 188
  6. Eng A. (2002). Learning and processing non-fiction genre. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  7. Ingalls D.H.H., 1990, The Dhvanyaloka of Anandavardana with the Locana of Abhinavagupta
  8. James H., 1951, The portable Henry James, 391
  9. Kerr A.P. (2005). Towards a therapeutics of reading literature: The influence of aesthetic distance and attachment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  10. Lipps T., 1900, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 22, 415
  11. Mandler J.M., 1984, Stories, scripts, & scenes: Aspects of schema theory
  12. Mar R.A. (2007). Simulation-based theories of narrative comprehension: Evidence and implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  13. Mar R.A., Oatley K., Eng A. (2003, August). Abstraction and the vividness of details in fiction. In T.C. Brock (Chair), Models and mechanisms of narrative persuasion . Talk and symposium presented at the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  14. Oatley K., 1997, Emotion and the arts, 163
  15. Oatley K., 2005, Culture and Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 181
  16. Palmer A., 2004, Fictional minds
  17. Poe E.A., 1967, Edgar Allan Poe: Selected writings
  18. Polichak J.W., 2002, Narrative impact, 71
  19. Stein S., 1995, Stein on writing
  20. Stevenson R.L., 1992, R.L. Stevenson essays and poems, 1179
  21. Strange J.J., 2002, Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations, 263
  22. Swift G., 1983, Waterland
  23. Taylor S.E., 1981, Social cognition: The Ontario symposium, 1, 89
  24. Trabasso T., Chung J. (2004, January 23). Empathy: Tracking characters and monitoring their concerns in film . Paper presented at the Winter Text Conference, Jackson Hole, WY.
  25. 10.1037/0003-066x.45.6.709 · DOI
  26. Woolf V., 1924, Collected essays, 1, 319

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,345

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Mar, Raymond A.
ORCID
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2008-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
173-192
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
DOI
10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
OpenAlex
W2147279990
Semantic Scholar
c31c71fb2d12acc3b6ee37295171ea57d47f53cd
Cited by
1,345
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 136 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 25
FWCI
531.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE28-0004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
fiction, narrative fiction, simulation theory, social experience, empathy, social inference, social understanding, immersive experience, experiential learning, literary narrative, social cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review