Cited by 140Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

The deceptive nature of UVA tanning versus the modest protective effects of UVB tanning on human skin

Open access
Miyamura, Yoshinori, Coelho, Sergio G., Schlenz, Kathrin, Batzer, Jan, Smuda, Christoph, Choi, Wonseon, Brenner, Michaela, Passeron, Thierry +4 more·2011·Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research

Abstract

Summary: The relationship between human skin pigmentation and protection from ultraviolet (UV) radiation is an important element underlying differences in skin carcinogenesis rates. The association between UV damage and the risk of skin cancer is clear, yet a strategic balance in exposure to UV needs to be met. Dark skin is protected from UV‐induced DNA damage significantly more than light skin owing to the constitutively higher pigmentation, but an as yet unresolved and important question is what photoprotective benefit, if any, is afforded by facultative pigmentation (i.e. a tan induced by UV exposure). To address that and to compare the effects of various wavelengths of UV, we repetitively exposed human skin to suberythemal doses of UVA and/or UVB over 2 weeks after which a challenge dose of UVA and UVB was given. Although visual skin pigmentation (tanning) elicited by different UV exposure protocols was similar, the melanin content and UV‐protective effects against DNA damage in UVB‐tanned skin (but not in UVA‐tanned skin) were significantly higher. UVA‐induced tans seem to result from the photooxidation of existing melanin and its precursors with some redistribution of pigment granules, while UVB stimulates melanocytes to up‐regulate melanin synthesis and increases pigmentation coverage, effects that are synergistically stimulated in UVA and UVB‐exposed skin. Thus, UVA tanning contributes essentially no photoprotection, although all types of UV‐induced tanning result in DNA and cellular damage, which can eventually lead to photocarcinogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2010.00764.x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UVB is more cytotoxic than UVA, causing direct DNA damage through CPDs or 6,4-photoproducts that induce mutagenesis and skin cancers.

    “Although UVB accounts for approximately 6% of all UVR that reaches the earth's surface, it is more cytotoxic than UVA, causing direct DNA damage through photon absorption in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) or 6,4-photoproducts that eventually induce mutagenesis and skin cancers [7, 8].”

    From Sunscreens and Photoaging: A Review of Current Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamura, Y., Coelho, S. G., Schlenz, K., Batzer, J., Smuda, C., Choi, W., Brenner, M., Passeron, T., Zhang, G., Kolbe, L., Wolber, R., & Hearing, V. J.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Beiersdorf (Germany) (DE)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (US)
Corresponding author
Hearing, Vincent J.
Venue
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-06
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
136-147
ISSN
  • 1755-1471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-148X
OpenAlex
W2171991822
Cited by
140
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (ZIABC010784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
photoprotection, melanin, melanocyte stimulation, DNA damage, skin pigmentation, photocarcinogenesis, skin cancer risk, melanogenesis
MeSH terms
DNA Damage, Humans, Melanins, Pyrimidine Dimers, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Ultraviolet Rays, Skin, Artificial, Protective Agents, Sunbathing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review