Cited by 531Misinformation and Its ImpactsMedia Influence and PoliticsSocial Media and Politics

Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation: Emotions and Misperceptions

Weeks, Brian E.·2015·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Citizens are frequently misinformed about political issues and candidates but the circumstances under which inaccurate beliefs emerge are not fully understood. This experimental study demonstrates that the independent experience of two emotions, anger and anxiety, in part determines whether citizens consider misinformation in a partisan or open-minded fashion. Anger encourages partisan, motivated evaluation of uncorrected misinformation that results in beliefs consistent with the supported political party, while anxiety at times promotes initial beliefs based less on partisanship and more on the information environment. However, exposure to corrections improves belief accuracy, regardless of emotion or partisanship. The results indicate that the unique experience of anger and anxiety can affect the accuracy of political beliefs by strengthening or attenuating the influence of partisanship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcom.12164

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weeks, B. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Weeks, Brian E.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2015-06-19
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
699-719
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1837189719
Cited by
531
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
58.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
political misinformation, partisanship, anger, anxiety, emotions, belief accuracy, misinformation correction, motivated reasoning, political beliefs, information environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review