Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation: Emotions and Misperceptions
Abstract
Citizens are frequently misinformed about political issues and candidates but the circumstances under which inaccurate beliefs emerge are not fully understood. This experimental study demonstrates that the independent experience of two emotions, anger and anxiety, in part determines whether citizens consider misinformation in a partisan or open-minded fashion. Anger encourages partisan, motivated evaluation of uncorrected misinformation that results in beliefs consistent with the supported political party, while anxiety at times promotes initial beliefs based less on partisanship and more on the information environment. However, exposure to corrections improves belief accuracy, regardless of emotion or partisanship. The results indicate that the unique experience of anger and anxiety can affect the accuracy of political beliefs by strengthening or attenuating the influence of partisanship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reliance on emotion is associated with misinformation sharing or believing in conspiracy theories.
“reliance on emotion is associated with misinformation sharing (Weeks, 2015) or believing in conspiracy theories (Garrett & Weeks, 2017;Martel et al., 2019)”
From The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Weeks, 2015
Cites
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691 · see citing works
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis :
Hayes, A. F., & names (2015) · Cited by 7,004 · see citing works
Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336 · Cited by 5,289 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Anxiety is associated with uncertainty, a lack of personal control, and high levels of physiological arousal, all of which lead people to develop strategies to reduce such feelings (Eysenck et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMotivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344 · see citing works
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146 · Cited by 3,325 · see citing works
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173 · see citing works
Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications.
Carver, C. S., & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013965 · Cited by 1,757 · see citing works
Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000) · Cited by 1,686 · see citing works
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions.
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.206 · Cited by 1,161 · see citing works
Slater, M. D. (2007) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation
Valentino, N. A., Brader, T. A., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381610000939 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
Coe, K., Kenski, K. M., & Rains, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12104 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions
Brader, T. A. (2005) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00014074 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Stimulus Sampling and Social Psychological Experimentation
Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672992512005 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion
Nabi, R. L. (2003) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650202250881 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”?
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Nabi, R. L. (1999) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x · Cited by 536 · see citing works
The sentimental citizen: emotion in democratic politics
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-3068 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation
MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L. J., & Marcus, G. E. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2012) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381612000187 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger
Huddy, L., Stanley, F., & Erin, C. (2007) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226574431.003.0009 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion
Bullock, J. G. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609090914 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., MacKuen, M., & Crigler, A. N. (2007) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226574431.001.0001 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Without You, I'm Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter
Papacharissi, Z. (2012) · International journal of communication · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Case for Emphasizing Discrete Emotions in Communication Research
Nabi, R. L. (2010) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751003790444 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Weeks, B. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2014) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu005 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-citationDruckman, J. N. (2012) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Troubling Consequences of Online Political Rumoring
Garrett, R. (2011) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01401.x · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Garrett, R., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12038 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Parsimony and Complexity: Developing and Testing Theories of Affective Intelligence
Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. (2011) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x · Cited by 156 · see citing works
The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions
Garrett, R., & Weeks, B. E. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441895 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationWeeks, B. E., & Southwell, B. G. (2010) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205430903470532 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationReassessing the Role of Anxiety in Vote Choice
Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. (2008) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00626.x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss‐Morse, E., & Stevens, D. P. (2005) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00452.x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Motivated Misperception? Party, Education, Partisan News, and Belief in “Death Panels”
Meirick, P. C. (2013) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699012468696 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Did Fact Checking Matter in the 2012 Presidential Campaign?
Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Winneg, K. M., et al. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213489012 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Goodall, C. E., Slater, M. D., & Myers, T. A. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12020 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Political Relevance of Emotions: “Reassessing” Revisited
Brader, T. A. (2011) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00803.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Symbolic Racism and Emotional Responses to the 2012 Presidential Candidates
Redlawsk, D. P., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeely, N. A. (2014) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912914531091 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y · Cited by 1,372 · see citing works
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.
Swire-Thompson, B., DeGutis, J., & Lazer, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., Wright, J., McEachan, R., Sheard, L., & the Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13240 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Jerit, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Bryanov, K., & Vziatysheva, V. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253717 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Cognitive and affective responses to political disinformation in Facebook
Barfar, A. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.026 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Carrasco-Farré, C. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01174-9 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
True or False: Studying the Work Practices of Professional Fact-Checkers
Micallef, N., Armacost, V., Memon, N., & Patil, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512974 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Emotions in online rumor diffusion
Pröllochs, N., Bär, D., & Feuerriegel, S. (2021) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00307-5 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a2ydw · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hilbert, M., Ahmed, S., Cho, J., Liu, B., & Luu, J. (2018) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1479843 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac002 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weeks, B. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weeks, Brian E.
- ORCID
- Weeks, Brian E.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 699-719
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1837189719
- Semantic Scholar
- e4fa93b6e9f0a6f5d8414340c9d90712364c4878
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 58.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- political misinformation, partisanship, anger, anxiety, emotions, belief accuracy, misinformation correction, motivated reasoning, political beliefs, information environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review