Cited by 20Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOccupational Health and BurnoutCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on reducing psychological distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Karo, Mestiana, Simorangkir, Lindawati, Daryanti Saragih, Ita, Suarilah, Ira, Tzeng, Huey‐Ming·2024·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose: Nurses increasingly use mindfulness as an effective mental health intervention to reduce psychological distress. The effectiveness of mindfulness‐based interventions remains inconclusive, which may lead to implementation of interventions in an inefficient or ineffective manner. This study aimed to examine the effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on reducing stress, anxiety, and depression among nurses. Design: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched using six databases published through May 20, 2023, which evaluated the effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on reducing psychological distress among nurses. To assess the quality of methodology included in the RCTs, version 2 of the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias instrument for RCTs with five domains was used. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random–effects model in the meta‐analyses. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's regression test. Further, the robustness effect size of the pooled analysis was assessed using leave‐one‐out sensitivity analysis. Findings: A total of 16 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Overall, the modalities appeared to alleviate stress (pooled SMD: −0.50 [95% CI: −0.82 to −0.18]; p < 0.001) and depression (pooled SMD: −0.42 [95% CI: −0.78 to −0.06]; p = 0.02) among nurses. Conclusion: Mindfulness‐based interventions appear to alleviate stress and depression in nurses. Future research evaluating mindfulness‐based interventions among working nurses with more rigorous methodological and larger sample size. Clinical Relevance: Support for nurses' mental health must be included while implementing personal and professional development plans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnu.12941

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karo, M., Simorangkir, L., Daryanti Saragih, I., Suarilah, I., & Tzeng, H.
Affiliations
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Santa Elisabeth Medan (ID)
  • College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung Taiwan
  • Universitas Airlangga (ID)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-11-13
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
319-330
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W4388638593
Cited by
20
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, nurses, psychological distress, occupational stress, anxiety, depression, nurse mental health, workplace mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Nurses, Stress, Psychological, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review