Cited by 77Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

“Pretty Pressure” From Peers, Parents, and the Media: A Longitudinal Study of Appearance‐Based Rejection Sensitivity

Open access
Webb, Haley J., Zimmer‐Gembeck, Melanie J., Waters, Allison M., Farrell, Lara J., Nesdale, Drew, Downey, Geraldine·2017·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

Drawing from the tripartite sociocultural model of body image, the researchers examined whether direct messages and modeling from peers, parents, and media were concurrently and prospectively associated with appearance‐based rejection sensitivity (appearance‐RS) in young adolescents (Mage = 12.0 years). Appearance‐RS was higher among those who concurrently reported more appearance‐related teasing and pressure by peers, more parent teasing, and greater acceptance of media appearance ideals. In prospective analyses, greater increases in appearance‐RS over 1 year were found for adolescents who perceived higher levels of parental appearance‐related teasing and negative attitudes about their own appearance. Moderation analyses indicated the positive prospective association between parental negative appearance attitudes and appearance‐RS was found in younger but not older participants. Gender did not moderate associations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jora.12310

Cites

90 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In youth, questionnaire-assessed appearance-related RS independent of gender was related to dysfunctional eating behavior, lower self-esteem and more frequent experience of appearance-related teasing.

    “In youth, questionnaire-assessed appearance-related RS independent of gender, was related to dysfunctional eating behavior, lower self-esteem and more frequent experience of appearance-related teasing [26].”

    From Correlates of interpersonal emotion regulation problems in Loss of Control eating (LOC) in youth: study protocol of the combined online and App based questionnaire, laboratory and randomized controlled online intervention i-BEAT trial (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The paper describes appearance-RS as questionnaire-assessed and reports an association with appearance teasing by peers and parents (Measures Appearance-RS; Model 1: Concurrent Correlates, page unavailable). It also reports poorer self-esteem and more restrictive eating behavior among adolescents and adults with higher appearance-RS (background passage labeled Abstract, page unavailable). Its gender analysis addresses associations with sociocultural influences, not whether the self-esteem and eating associations are independent of gender; it also specifies restrictive eating rather than dysfunctional eating generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Downey, G., Khouri, H., & Feldman, S. (1997). Early interpersonal trauma and adult adjustment: The mediational role of rejection sensitivity. In D. Cicchetti & S. Toth (eds.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology, Volume VIII (pp. 85-114). New York: University of Rochester Press.
  3. Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, S. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21,173-206.
  4. MacBrayer, E. K., Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., Demos, S., & Simmons, J. (2001). The role of family of origin food-related experiences in bulimic symptomatology, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 149-160.
  5. Robins, R. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2005). Self-esteem development across the lifespan. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 158-162. doi:10.1111/j.0963- 7214.2005.00353.x · DOI
  6. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, H. J., Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J., Waters, A. M., Farrell, L. J., Nesdale, D., & Downey, G.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Haley J.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-24
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
718-735
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W2601569522
Cited by
77
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
body image, peer pressure, appearance attitudes, early adolescents, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Attitude, Body Image, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mass Media, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Peer Group, Prospective Studies, Rejection, Psychology, Self Concept, Body Dysmorphic Disorders, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review