Cited by 112Youth Development and Social SupportEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Student Engagement in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Longitudinal Studies 2010–2020

Open access
Salmela‐Aro, Katariina, Tang, Xin, Symonds, Jennifer, Upadyaya, Katja·2021·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

We systematically mapped and analyzed the longitudinal research on adolescent student engagement published during 2010–2020. A total of 104 studies of 104,304 adolescents met inclusion criteria. Studies were mainly conducted in North America (43%) or Europe (34%). Over half studied engagement across one or more years. Most studies (93%) focused on antecedents of engagement rather than outcomes of engagement (38%). Data were commonly collected using self‐report questionnaires (87%) and analyzed using path, growth, and cross‐lagged models. Studies mainly examined engagement in classroom activities, school, or schoolwork; and focused on behavioral engagement (70%), followed by emotional (61%), then cognitive engagement (35%). No studies used a specific theory of engagement development, but instead referred to self‐determination, ecological systems, and stage‐environment fit theories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jora.12619

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another problem may be that theory is used merely as window dressing, with vague or shallow connections between theory and research.

    “Another problem may be that theory is used merely as a window dressing, with vague or shallow connections between theory and research (Salmela-Aro et al., 2021).”

    From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Salmela-Aro et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmela‐Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upadyaya, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Salmela‐Aro, Katariina
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-15
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
256-272
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W3160238026
Cited by
112
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland (308351, 336138)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
student engagement, adolescents, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, antecedents of engagement, school engagement, classroom activities, self-determination theory, ecological systems theory, longitudinal development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review