Cited by 96Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

Chronotype is associated with the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in toddlers

Open access
Simpkin, Charles T., Jenni, Oskar G., Carskadon, Mary A., Wright, Kenneth P., Akacem, Lameese D., Garlo, Katherine G., LeBourgeois, Monique K.·2014·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Chronotype is a construct reflecting individual differences in diurnal preference. Although chronotype has been studied extensively in school-age children, adolescents and adults, data on young children are scarce. This study describes chronotype and its relationship to the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in 48 healthy children aged 30-36 months (33.4 ± 2.1 months; 24 males). Parents completed the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ) ~2 weeks before the start of the study. The CCTQ provides three measures of chronotype: midsleep time on free days, a multi-item morningness/eveningness score and a single item chronotype score. After 5 days of sleeping on their habitual schedule (assessed with actigraphy and sleep diaries), children participated in an in-home salivary dim light melatonin onset assessment. Average midsleep time on free days was 1:47 ± 0:35, and the average morningness/eveningness score was 26.8 ± 4.3. Most toddlers (58.4%) were rated as 'definitely a morning type' or 'rather morning than evening type', while none (0%) were rated as 'definitely evening type'. More morning types (midsleep time on free days and morningness/eveningness score, respectively) had earlier melatonin onset times (r = 0.45, r = 0.26), earlier habitual bedtimes (r = 0.78, r = 0.54), sleep onset times (r = 0.80, r = 0.52), sleep midpoint times (r = 0.90, r = 0.53) and wake times (r = 0.74, r = 0.34). Parent ratings using the single-item chronotype score were associated with melatonin onset (r = 0.32) and habitual bedtimes (r = 0.27), sleep onset times (r = 0.33) and sleep midpoint times (r = 0.27). Morningness may best characterize circadian preference in early childhood. Associations between chronotype and circadian physiology and sleep timing suggest adequate validity for the CCTQ in this age group. These findings have important implications for understanding the marked variability in sleep timing during the early years of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12142

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few studies that have investigated chronotype in young children, through the use of the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire or DLMO, all have repeatedly observed a greater prevalence of morning chronotype in young children.

    “The few studies that have investigated chronotype in young children, through the use of the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire or DLMO, all have repeatedly observed a greater prevalence of morning chronotype in young children (5, 94, 95).”
  • The timing of sleep onset and waking and other biological rhythms is earlier relative to adults during early childhood and shifts later during adolescence.

    “In general, the timing of sleep onset and waking and other biological rhythms (for example, fluctuations in melatonin levels) is earlier relative to adults during early childhood8,9 and shifts later during adolescence, and this shift in timing may be conserved among rodents and non-human primates (NHPs)10.”
  • Most infants, toddlers (2-3-year-olds) and young children (4-11-year-olds) display earlier sleep-wake patterns and a stronger morning preference than do adults, according to the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire, even when considering high variability in sleep measures.

    “Most infants, toddlers (2–3-year-olds) and young children (4–11-year-olds) display earlier sleep–wake patterns and a stronger morning preference than do adults, according to the Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire — even when considering the high intra-individual and interindividual variability of sleep onset, mid-points and wake times measured by parental report questionnaires and actigraphy8,9.”
  • On non-scheduled days, children tend to wake up later, substantially delaying their sleep-wake times, indicating that social and environmental factors, such as schedules imposed by school and parents, have a major influence on survey-based measures of chronotype.

    “However, on non-scheduled days, children tend to wake up later, substantially delaying their sleep–wake times, indicating that social and environmental factors, such as schedules imposed by school and parents, have a major influence on survey-based measures of chronotype9.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpkin, C. T., Jenni, O. G., Carskadon, M. A., Wright, K. P., Akacem, L. D., Garlo, K. G., & LeBourgeois, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
LeBourgeois, Monique K.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
397-405
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2119241524
Cited by
96
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01-MH074643, R01-MH08656)
  • Sepracor, Inc. (ESRC026)
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • NIH/NCRR (CTSI UL1-TR000154)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
chronotype, circadian clock, sleep timing, toddlers, melatonin onset, sleep onset, diurnal preference, early childhood sleep
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Melatonin, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Actigraphy, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review