Cited by 101Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVasculitis and related conditionsSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

Confirmation of initial antiphospholipid antibody positivity depends on the antiphospholipid antibody profile

Open access
Pengo, V., Ruffatti, A., Del Ross, T., Tonello, M., Cuffaro, S., Hoxha, A., Banzato, A., Bison, E. +3 more·2013·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti-β2 -glycoprotein I [aβ2 GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months.Objectives In order to early classify patient risk, we evaluated whether aPL positivity confirmation is related to aPL antibody profiles.Patients and methods Consecutive patients referred to our center who were initially positive in one or more tests exploring the presence of aPL were tested after 3 months. During a 4-year period, 225 patients were initially positive in one or more tests, and 161 were available for confirmation after 3 months. Patients were classified as triple-positive (n = 54: LAC(+) , aCL(+) , aβ2 GPI(+) , same isotype), double-positive (n = 50: LAC(-) , aCL(+) , aβ2 GPI(+) , same isotype) and single-positive (n = 53: LAC or aCL or aβ2 GPI antibodies as the sole positive test).Results Among subjects with triple positivity at initial testing, 98% (53 of 54) had their aPL profile confirmed after 12 weeks. The double-positive and single-positive groups had data confirmed in 42 of 50 (84%) and 23 of 57 (40%) subjects, respectively.Conclusions Our results show that high-risk subjects with triple-positive aPL profiles are identified early, at the time of the initial screening tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jth.12264

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pengo, V., Ruffatti, A., Del Ross, T., Tonello, M., Cuffaro, S., Hoxha, A., Banzato, A., Bison, E., Denas, G., Bracco, A., & Padayattil Jose, S.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Pengo, V.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1527-1531
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142444723
Cited by
101
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, antibody isotypes, antibody profiles, risk stratification, confirmatory testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review