Cited by 8Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overview

Social associations and vocal communication in wild and captive male savannah elephants Loxodonta africana

Morris‐Drake, Amy, Mumby, Hannah S.·2018·Mammal Review

Abstract

Despite growing evidence that males often associate in all‐male groups, there has been no review of male savannah elephant Loxodonta africana social relationships or of the use of vocal communication within these male groups. We assess the evidence for all‐male group formation and for the use of vocal communication by males throughout the savannah elephant range of southern and eastern Africa, as well as in ex‐situ studies of captive animals. We derived data from two quantitative reviews of the published literature, for associations and for vocalisations, respectively. We supplemented these structured reviews with searches for books and of bibliographies. We compiled evidence from 30 studies on associative groups, and found that group size was the most commonly reported variable (mean group size reported 2–4.9; range reported 2–40 when excluding studies that included lone males). We found 22 studies reporting evidence of vocal communication in males. A total of four studies were retrieved from both searches, indicating that these areas of research may overlap. We found that male elephants are frequently reported to be in groups, throughout their range and over time, although the groups are small: median group size was three. The diversity of male savannah elephant group sizes may indicate the behavioural flexibility of the species. It could also represent a lack of studies focusing on males. We found a paucity of research on male vocal communication (5% of studies were concentrated solely on male bioacoustics), particularly in natural settings, and few studies reported the social context or role of male vocal signals outside of musth. We see great scope for future research at the important intersection between male elephant associations and vocal communication, including research on the role of vocalisations in mediating all‐male associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mam.12106

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris‐Drake, A., & Mumby, H. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mumby, Hannah S.
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-19
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
24-36
ISSN
  • 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2907
OpenAlex
W2766215974
Cited by
8
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pembroke College, University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
savannah elephant, Loxodonta africana, all-male groups, bioacoustics, group size, musth, captive elephants, behavioral flexibility, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review