Cited by 165Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutritional Studies and Diet

Dietary energy density: Applying behavioural science to weight management

Open access
Rolls, B. J.·2017·Nutrition Bulletin

Abstract

Studies conducted by behavioural scientists show that the energy density (kcal/g) of food provides effective guidance for healthy food choices to control intake and promote satiety. Energy density depends upon a number of dietary components, especially water (0 kcal/g) and fat (9 kcal/g). Increasing the proportion of water or water‐rich ingredients, such as vegetables or fruit, lowers a food's energy density. A number of studies show that when the energy density of the diet is reduced, both adults and children spontaneously decrease their ad libitum energy intake. Other studies show that consuming a large volume of a low‐energy‐dense food, such as soup, salad or fruit, as a first course preload can enhance satiety and reduce overall energy intake at a meal. Current evidence suggests that energy density influences intake through a complex interplay of cognitive, sensory, gastrointestinal, hormonal and neural influences. Other studies that focus on practical applications show how the strategic incorporation of foods lower in energy density into the diet allows people to eat satisfying portions while improving dietary patterns. This review discusses studies that have led to greater understanding of the importance of energy density for food intake regulation and weight management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nbu.12280

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolls, B. J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rolls, B. J.
Venue
Nutrition Bulletin
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-15
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
246-253
ISSN
  • 1467-3010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9827
OpenAlex
W2749237558
Cited by
165
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011‐67001‐30117)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01‐DK082580, R01‐DK059853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
dietary energy density, weight management, satiety, energy intake regulation, behavioral science, preload, ad libitum energy intake, food choice, dietary habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review