Cited by 1,029CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Open access

Shi, Jinrui, Gao, Huirong, Wang, Hongyu, Lafitte, H. Renee, Archibald, Rayeann L., Yang, Meizhu, Hakimi, Salim M., Mo, Hua, Habben, Jeffrey E.·2017·Plant Biotechnology Journal

DOI 10.1111/pbi.12603PMC PMC5258859

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Maize ARGOS8 is a negative regulator of ethylene responses. A previous study has shown that transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing ARGOS8 have reduced ethylene sensitivity and improved grain yield under drought stress conditions. To explore the targeted use of ARGOS8 native expression variation in drought-tolerant breeding, a diverse set of over 400 maize inbreds was examined for ARGOS8 mRNA expression, but the expression levels in all lines were less than that created in the original ARGOS8 transgenic events. We then employed a CRISPR-Cas-enabled advanced breeding technology to generate novel variants of ARGOS8. The native maize GOS2 promoter, which confers a moderate level of constitutive expression, was inserted into the 5'-untranslated region of the native ARGOS8 gene or was used to replace the native promoter of ARGOS8. Precise genomic DNA modification at the ARGOS8 locus was verified by PCR and sequencing. The ARGOS8 variants had elevated levels of ARGOS8 transcripts relative to the native allele and these transcripts were detectable in all the tissues tested, which was the expected results using the GOS2 promoter. A field study showed that compared to the WT, the ARGOS8 variants increased grain yield by five bushels per acre under flowering stress conditions and had no yield loss under well-watered conditions. These results demonstrate the utility of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in generating novel allelic variation for breeding drought-tolerant crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12603

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. L. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,684
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics
Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., Graves, T., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178534 · Cited by 4,096
Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2969 · Cited by 2,072
Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9
Li, J., Norville, J. E., Aach, J., McCormack, M., Zhang, D., Bush, J., Church, G. M., & Sheen, J. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2654 · Cited by 1,533
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309
Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice
Jiang, W., Zhou, H., Bi, H., Fromm, M., Yang, B., & Weeks, D. P. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt780 · Cited by 1,282
High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice
Li, T., Liu, B., Spalding, M. H., Weeks, D. P., & Yang, B. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2199 · Cited by 1,149
Insensitivity to Ethylene Conferred by a Dominant Mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Bleecker, A. B., Estelle, M. A., Somerville, C. R., & Kende, H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.241.4869.1086 · Cited by 1,014

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Can We Use Gene-Editing to Induce Apomixis in Sexual Plants?
Scheben, A., & Hojsgaard, D. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11070781 · Cited by 39
The Mechanisms of Genome Editing Technologies in Crop Plants
Ahmad, Y., Haider, S., Iqbal, J., Abbasi, B. A., Yaseen, T., & Mahmood, T. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96925-7_13 · Cited by 40
Multi-faceted CRISPR-Cas9 strategy to reduce plant based food loss and waste for sustainable bio-economy – A review
Palanivel, H., Abda, E. M., Shah, S., Prabhu, S. V., Jayakumar, M., Karmegam, N., Kim, W., & Govarthanan, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117382 · Cited by 42
Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses – prospects of using genome editing
Sustek-Sánchez, F., Rognli, O. A., Rostoks, N., Sõmera, M., Jaškūnė, K., Kovi, M. R., Statkevičiūtė, G., & Sarmiento, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1127532 · Cited by 43
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing throughin plantatransformation
Zlobin, N., Lebedeva, M. V., & Taranov, V. V. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2019.1709795 · Cited by 38
Improving Horticultural Crops via CRISPR/Cas9: Current Successes and Prospects
Bhatta, B. P., & Malla, S. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9101360 · Cited by 40
Advances in Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Wheat
Mondal, S., Sallam, A., Sehgal, D., Sukumaran, S., Farhad, M., Krishnan, J. N., Kumar, U., & Biswal, A. K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75875-2_2 · Cited by 38
Chickpea Biofortification for Cytokinin Dehydrogenase via Genome Editing to Enhance Abiotic-Biotic Stress Tolerance and Food Security
Mahto, R. K., Ambika, A., Singh, C., Chandana, B. S., Singh, R. K., Verma, S., Gahlaut, V., Manohar, M., Yadav, N., & Kumar, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.900324 · Cited by 41
Maize Transformation: From Plant Material to the Release of Genetically Modified and Edited Varieties
Yassitepe, J. É. D. C. T., da Silva, V. C. H., Hernandes‐Lopes, J., Dante, R. A., Gerhardt, I. R., Fernandes, F. R., da Silva, P. A., Vieira, L. R., Bonatti, V., & Arruda, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.766702 · Cited by 37
CRISPR-Cas9 System Mediated Genome Editing Technology: An Ultimate Tool to Enhance Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants
Mohamed, H. I., Khan, A. R., & Basıt, A. (2024) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.1007/s42729-024-01778-x · Cited by 43
Sustained improvement in tolerance to water deficit accompanies maize yield increase in temperate environments
Messina, C. D., Ciampitti, I. A., Berning, D., Bubeck, D., Hammer, G., & Cooper, M. (2022) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20781 · Cited by 37
Back to the future: implications of genetic complexity for the structure of hybrid breeding programs
Technow, F., Podlich, D., & Cooper, M. (2021) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab153 · Cited by 35
Application of CRISPR/Cas to Understand Cis- and Trans-Regulatory Elements in Plants
Wolter, F., & Puchta, H. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8657-6_2 · Cited by 35
CRISPR/Cas9‐Based Genome Editing and its Applications for Functional Genomic Analyses in Plants
Li, J., Li, Y., & Ma, L. (2019) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.201800473 · Cited by 36
The Judgment of the CJEU of 25 July 2018 on Mutagenesis: Interpretation and Interim Legislative Proposal
Vives-Vallés, J. A., & Collonnier, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01813 · Cited by 36
CRISPR-Cas genome-editing tool in plant abiotic stress-tolerance
Biswas, D., Saha, S. C., & Dey, A. (2021) · Plant Gene · doi:10.1016/j.plgene.2021.100286 · Cited by 37
Optimizing glyphosate tolerance in rapeseed by CRISPR/Cas9-based geminiviral donor DNA replicon system with Csy4-based single-guide RNA processing
Wang, Z., Wan, L., Xin, Q., Zhang, X., Song, Y., Wang, P., Hong, D., Fan, Z., & Yang, G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab167 · Cited by 36
An Efficient Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-Associated Protein 9 Mutagenesis System for Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis)
Yeap, W., Khan, N. C. M., Jamalludin, N., Muad, M. R., Appleton, D. R., & Kulaveerasingam, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.773656 · Cited by 37
Epigenetic marks for mitigating abiotic stresses in plants
Ali, S., Khan, N., & Tang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153740 · Cited by 40
CRISPR/Cas genome editing in plants: Dawn of Agrobacterium transformation for recalcitrant and transgene-free plants for future crop breeding
Ceasar, S. A., & Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu, S. J. (2023) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.02.030 · Cited by 39
CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: A revolutionary approach for crop improvement and global food security
Muhae‐Ud‐Din, G., Ali, F., Hameed, A., Naqvi, S. A. H., Nizamani, M. M., Jabran, M., Sarfraz, S., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102191 · Cited by 44
Gene-Edited Crops: Towards a Harmonized Safety Assessment
Kleter, G. A., Kuiper, H. A., & Kok, E. J. (2019) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.014 · Cited by 35
Advance of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Cas9 System and Its Application in Crop Improvement
Rao, Y., Yang, X., Pan, C., Wang, C., & Wang, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.839001 · Cited by 36
TILLING by Sequencing (TbyS) for targeted genome mutagenesis in crops
Kumar, A. P. K., McKeown, P. C., Boualem, A., Ryder, P., Brychkova, G., Bendahmane, A., Sarkar, A., Chatterjee, M., & Spillane, C. (2017) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-017-0620-1 · Cited by 35
Raising Climate-Resilient Crops: Journey From the Conventional Breeding to New Breeding Approaches
Gaba, Y., Pareek, A., & Singla-Pareek, S. L. (2021) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/1389202922666210928151247 · Cited by 35
Expanding Gene-Editing Potential in Crop Improvement with Pangenomes
Fernandez, C. G. T., Nestor, B. J., Danilevicz, M. F., Marsh, J. I., Petereit, J., Bayer, P. E., Batley, J., & Edwards, D. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23042276 · Cited by 40
Genome editing for improving nutritional quality, post-harvest shelf life and stress tolerance of fruits, vegetables, and ornamentals
Sharma, P., Pandey, A., Malviya, R., Dey, S., Karmakar, S., & Gayen, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2023.1094965 · Cited by 36
Stomatal improvement for crop stress resistance
Wang, L., & Chang, C. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad477 · Cited by 34
Using Biotechnology-Led Approaches to Uplift Cereal and Food Legume Yields in Dryland Environments
Dwivedi, S. L., Siddique, K. H. M., Farooq, M., Thornton, P. K., & Ortiz, R. O. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01249 · Cited by 33
The potential applications of site-directed mutagenesis for crop improvement: a review
Bezie, Y., Tilahun, T., Atnaf, M., & Taye, M. (2020) · Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12892-020-00080-3 · Cited by 34
Genome editing in future crop protection: utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 to improve crop resistance against diseases, pests, and weeds
Faizal, A., Nugroho, S., Sembada, A. A., Theda, Y., Komariyah, T., & Esyanti, R. R. (2024) · Discover Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s44279-024-00124-0 · Cited by 35
Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing System in Cereal Crops
Hillary, V. E., & Ceasar, S. A. (2019) · The Open Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874070701913010173 · Cited by 35
Revisiting CRISPR/Cas-mediated crop improvement: special focus on nutrition
Kaul, T., Sony, S. K., Verma, R., Motelb, K. F. A., Prakash, A. T., Eswaran, M., Bharti, J., Nehra, M., & Kaul, R. (2020) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-020-00094-7 · Cited by 33
Role of BraRGL1 in regulation of Brassica rapa bolting and flowering
Wang, Y., Song, S., Hao, Y., Chen, C., Ou, X., He, B., Zhang, J., Jiang, Z., Li, C., Zhang, S., et al. (2023) · Horticulture Research · doi:10.1093/hr/uhad119 · Cited by 32
Smart Breeding for Climate Resilient Agriculture
Bakala, H. S., Singh, G., & Srivastava, P. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.94847 · Cited by 34
Increasing yield on dry fields: molecular pathways with growing potential
Berrío, R. T., Nelissen, H., Inzé, D., & Dubois, M. (2021) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15550 · Cited by 32
Promoter editing for the genetic improvement of crops
Shi, L., Su, J., Cho, M., Song, H., Dong, O. X., Liang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad175 · Cited by 36
CRISPR-Cas technology opens a new era for the creation of novel maize germplasms
Wang, Y., Tang, Q., Pu, L., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1049803 · Cited by 31
CRISPR-Cas9 mediated understanding of plants’ abiotic stress-responsive genes to combat changing climatic patterns
Choudry, M. W., Riaz, R., Nawaz, P., Ashraf, M., Ijaz, B., & Bakhsh, A. (2024) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-024-01405-z · Cited by 31
Water–Energy–Food Nexus in the Agri-Food Sector: Research Trends and Innovating Practices
Correa-Porcel, V., Piedra‐Muñoz, L., & Gómez, E. G. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182412966 · Cited by 31
Application of CRISPR/Cas system in cereal improvement for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance
Maharajan, T., Krishna, T. P. A., Rakkammal, K., Ceasar, S. A., & Ramesh, M. (2022) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-022-04023-w · Cited by 32
Molecular and Functional Characterization of Wheat ARGOS Genes Influencing Plant Growth and Stress Tolerance
Zhao, Y., Tian, X., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Guan, P., Kou, X., Wang, X., Xin, M., Hu, Z., Yao, Y., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00170 · Cited by 30
Genetic, molecular and physiological crosstalk during drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays): pathways to resilient agriculture
Peer, L. A., Bhat, M. Y., Lone, A. A., Dar, Z. A., & Mir, B. A. (2024) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-024-04517-9 · Cited by 30
CRISPR-associated nucleases: the Dawn of a new age of efficient crop improvement
Ghogare‬, R., Williamson-Benavides, B. A., Ramírez-Torres, F. G., & Dhingra, A. (2019) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00181-y · Cited by 31
Gene Editing to Accelerate Crop Breeding
Dhugga, K. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.889995 · Cited by 30
The Potential of CRISPR/Cas Technology to Enhance Crop Performance on Adverse Soil Conditions
Gajardo, H. A., Gómez-Espinoza, O., Ferreira, P. B., Carrer, H., & Bravo, L. A. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12091892 · Cited by 32
Structural aspects of DNA repair and recombination in crop improvement
Verma, P., Tandon, R., Yadav, G., & Gaur, V. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.574549 · Cited by 29
Functional Allele Validation by Gene Editing to Leverage the Wealth of Genetic Resources for Crop Improvement
Thomson, M. J., Biswas, S., Τσακιρπάλογλου, Ν., & Septiningsih, E. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23126565 · Cited by 30
Precision genome editing of crops for improved disease resistance
Greenwood, J. R., Zhang, X., & Rathjen, J. P. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.058 · Cited by 29
Maize BIG GRAIN1 homolog overexpression increases maize grain yield
Simmons, C. R., Weers, B. P., Reimann, K. S., Abbitt, S. E., Frank, M. J., Wang, W., Wu, J., Shen, B., & Habben, J. E. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13392 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Breeding Drought-Tolerant Maize (Zea mays) Using Molecular Breeding Tools: Recent Advancements and Future Prospective
Rasheed, A., Jie, H., Ali, B., He, P., Zhao, L., Ma, Y., Xing, H., Qari, S. H., Hassan, M., Hamid, M. R., et al. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13061459 · Cited by 29
An Overview of Genome‐Engineering Methods
Sushmita, S., Kaur, G., Upadhyay, S. K., & Verma, P. C. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119672425.ch1 · Cited by 29
Genome editing in maize and sorghum: A comprehensive review of CRISPR/Cas9 and emerging technologies
Namata, M. J., Xu, J., Habyarimana, E., Palakolanu, S. R., Wang, L., & Li, J. (2025) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70038 · Cited by 36
Dual-targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 leads to efficient point mutagenesis but only rare targeted deletions in the rice genome
Pathak, B. P., Zhao, S., Manoharan, M., & Srivastava, V. (2019) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-019-1690-z · Cited by 28
Current advances and future directions in genetic enhancement of a climate resilient food legume crop, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)
Sindhu, M., Kumar, A., Yadav, H., Chaudhary, D., Jaiwal, R., & Jaiwal, P. K. (2019) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-019-01695-3 · Cited by 28
CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Editing for the Improvement of Oilseed Crop Productivity
Subedi, U., Ozga, J. A., Chen, G., Foroud, N. A., & Singer, S. D. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2020.1782568 · Cited by 28
CRISPR: A new paradigm of theranostics
Yadav, N., Narang, J., Chhillar, A. K., & Rana, J. S. (2021) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2020.102350 · Cited by 31
ROLE OF CRISPR TO IMPROVE ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE IN CROP PLANTS
Farooq, M., Bashir, M., Khan, M., Iqbal, B., & Ali, Q. (2021) · Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2021i1.69 · Cited by 26
Modern Plant Biotechnology: An Antidote against Global Food Insecurity
Animasaun, D. A., Adedibu, P. A., Shkryl, Y., Emmanuel, F. O., Tekutyeva, L., & Balabanova, L. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13082038 · Cited by 31
Data-driven approaches to improve water-use efficiency and drought resistance in crop plants
Sharma, N., Raman, H., Wheeler, D. A., Yogendra, K. N., & Sharma, R. A. (2023) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111852 · Cited by 28
Synergizing biotechnology and natural farming: pioneering agricultural sustainability through innovative interventions
Badiyal, A., Mahajan, R., Rana, R. S., Sood, R., Walia, A., Rana, T., Manhas, S., & Jayswal, D. K. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1280846 · Cited by 27
CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture: Approaches, applications, future perspectives, and associated challenges
Adhikari, P., & Poudel, M. (2020) · Malaysian Journal of Halal Research · doi:10.2478/mjhr-2020-0002 · Cited by 23
Advances in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Genetic Improvement for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Barley
Karunarathne, S. D., Han, Y. N., Zhang, X., & Li, C. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10050662 · Cited by 27
Genome Editing: Revolutionizing the Crop Improvement
Saurabh, S. (2021) · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter · doi:10.1007/s11105-021-01286-7 · Cited by 30
Next-generation genetic engineering tools for abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Hossain, A., Ahmed, S., Ahmad, Z., Alam, M. J., Moulick, D., Saha, B., Samanta, S., Maitra, S., Bhadra, P., Bukhari, M. A., et al. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90943-3.00008-0 · Cited by 29
Two decades of creating drought tolerant maize and underpinning prediction technologies in the US corn-belt: Review and perspectives on the future of crop designPreprint
Messina, C. D., Cooper, M., Hammer, G., Berning, D., Ciampitti, I. A., Clark, R., Diepenbrock, C., Gho, C., Jines, M., Lee, T., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.29.361337 · Cited by 27
Advancements in Plant Gene Editing Technology: From Construct Design to Enhanced Transformation Efficiency
Yuan, P., Usman, M. A., Liu, W., Adhikari, A., Zhang, C., Njiti, V. N., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.202400457 · Cited by 26
Physiology Based Approaches for Breeding of Next-Generation Food Legumes
Shunmugam, A. S. K., Kannan, U., Jiang, Y., Daba, K. A., & Gorim, L. Y. (2018) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants7030072 · Cited by 29
Gene editing: an instrument for practical application of gene biology to plant breeding
Tan, Y., Du, H., Wu, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, M., Song, S., Wu, L., & Shu, Q. (2020) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b1900633 · Cited by 26
The genetic basis of water‐use efficiency and yield in lettuce
Damerum, A., Smith, H. K., Clarkson, G., Truco, M. J., Michelmore, R. W., & Taylor, G. (2021) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-021-02987-7 · Cited by 31
CRISPR/Cas System: Applications and Prospects for Maize Improvement
Jiang, Y., Sun, K., & An, X. (2022) · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00253 · Cited by 27
CRISPR/Cas tool designs for multiplex genome editing and its applications in developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant crop plants
Singh, J., Sharma, D., Brar, G. S., Sandhu, K. S., Wani, S. H., Kashyap, R., Kour, A., & Singh, S. (2022) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-022-07741-2 · Cited by 26
With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies
Kjeldaas, S., Dassler, T., Antonsen, T., Wikmark, O.-G., & Myhr, A. I. (2022) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-022-10367-6 · Cited by 29
Milestones achieved in response to drought stress through reverse genetic approaches
Singh, B., Kukreja, S., & Goutam, U. K. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15606.1 · Cited by 26
Molecular Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops: Recent Developments and Future Prospectives
Pagnotta, M. A. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26189164 · Cited by 30
Current status of potential applications of repurposed Cas9 for structural and functional genomics of plants
Seth, K., & Harish (2016) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.130 · Cited by 25
Comparative proteomics analysis of Tibetan hull-less barley under osmotic stress via data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry
Wang, Y., Sang, Z., Xu, S., Xu, Q., Zeng, X., Jabu, D., & Yuan, H. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa019 · Cited by 25
Engineering cereal crops for enhanced abiotic stress tolerance
Lata, C., & Shivhare, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy · doi:10.1007/s43538-021-00006-9 · Cited by 27
Meta-analysis of the effect of melatonin application on abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Yang, X., Ren, J., Li, J., Lin, X., Xia, X., Yan, W., Zhang, Y., Deng, X., & Ke, Q. (2022) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-022-00770-0 · Cited by 25
From Traditional Breeding to Genome Editing for Boosting Productivity of the Ancient Grain Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]
Numan, M., Khan, A. L., Asaf, S., Salehin, M., Beyene, G., Tadele, Z., & Ligaba‐Osena, A. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10040628 · Cited by 26
Molecular Basis and Engineering Strategies for Transcription Factor-Mediated Reproductive-Stage Heat Tolerance in Crop Plants
Sharma, N., Sharma, L., Onkarappa, D., Yogendra, K. N., Bose, J., & Sharma, R. A. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14010159 · Cited by 25
Genome-edited crops: how to move them from laboratory to market
Chen, K., & Gao, C. (2020) · Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering · doi:10.15302/j-fase-2020332 · Cited by 24
Biofuels and Sustainability
Eswaran, N., Parameswaran, S., & Johnson, T. S. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1323-8_20 · Cited by 28
ptxD/Phi as alternative selectable marker system for genetic transformation for bio-safety concerns: a review
Dormatey, R., Sun, C., Ali, K., Fiaz, S., Xu, D., Calderón‐Urrea, A., Bi, Z., Zhang, J., & Bai, J. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11809 · Cited by 24
Targeted genome modifications in cereal crops
Hisano, H., Abe, F., Hoffie, R. E., & Kumlehn, J. (2021) · Ikushugaku zasshi · doi:10.1270/jsbbs.21019 · Cited by 24
Unclasping potentials of genomics and gene editing in chickpea to fight climate change and global hunger threat
Singh, C., Kumar, R., Sehgal, H., Bhati, S., Singhal, T., Gayacharan, Nimmy, M. S., Yadav, R., Gupta, S. K., Abdallah, N. A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1085024 · Cited by 26
A comprehensive appraisal of mechanism of anti-CRISPR proteins: an advanced genome editor to amend the CRISPR gene editing
Choudhary, N., Tandi, D., Verma, R. K., Yadav, V. K., Dhingra, N., Ghosh, T., Choudhary, M., Gaur, R. K., Abdellattif, M. H., Gacem, A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1164461 · Cited by 26
THE JOURNEY OF CRISPR-CAS9 FROM BACTERIAL DEFENSE MECHANISM TO A GENE EDITING TOOL IN BOTH ANIMALS AND PLANTS
Tahir, T., Ali, Q., Rashid, M., & Malik, A. (2020) · Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2020i1.17 · Cited by 23
Plant genotype-microbiome engineering as nature-based solution (NbS) for regeneration of stressed agriculture: A review
Vimal, S. R., Singh, J. S., Kumar, A., & Prasad, S. M. (2023) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112258 · Cited by 23
Maize Improvement Based on Modern Breeding Strategies: Progress and Perspective
He, B., Pan, S., Zhao, J., Zou, X., Liu, X., & Wu, S. (2024) · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00427 · Cited by 23
Transcriptional gene network involved in drought stress response: application for crop breeding in the context of climate change
Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0236 · Cited by 23
Precise knock‐in of stress‐responsive cis ‐regulatory elements using gene targeting for improving abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Ke, Y., Kong, D., Zhang, W., Zeng, W., Kong, Z., Dang, X., Zhu, J., & Miki, D. (2025) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.70348 · Cited by 23
Use of genome editing technologies for genetic improvement of crops of tropical origin
Rojas-Vásquez, R., & Gatica-Arias, A. (2019) · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-019-01707-2 · Cited by 23
CRISPR Genome Editing Technology: A Powerful Tool Applied to Developing Agribusiness
Maximiano, M. R., Távora, F. T. P. K., Prado, G. S., Dias, S. C., Mehta, Â., & Franco, O. L. (2021) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01062 · Cited by 25
Generating, modeling and evaluating a large-scale set of CRISPR/Cas9 off-target sites with bulges
Yaish, O., & Orenstein, Y. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae428 · Cited by 24
Foreign DNA detection by high-throughput sequencing to regulate genome-edited agricultural products
Itoh, T., Onuki, R., Tsuda, M., Oshima, M., Endo, M., Sakai, H., Tanaka, T., Ohsawa, R., & Tabei, Y. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61949-5 · Cited by 23
Advances in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for crop improvement and global food security
Haider, S., Singh, A. P., Panthi, B., Sindhu, S. R., Safa, N. T., Malik, S., & Rahimi, M. (2026) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2026.100593 · Cited by 25
Fruit crops improvement using CRISPR/Cas9 system
Kaur, N., Awasthi, P., & Tiwari, S. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818140-9.00012-x · Cited by 22
Developmental genetics of maize vegetative shoot architecture
Strable, J. (2021) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-021-01208-1 · Cited by 24
Potential applications of the CRISPR/Cas technology for genetic improvement of yam ( Dioscorea spp.)
Syombua, E. D., Tripathi, J. N., Obiero, G. O., Nguu, E. K., Yang, B., Wang, K., & Tripathi, L. (2021) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.330 · Cited by 24

Authors: Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Hakimi, S. M., Mo, H., & Habben, J. E.
Affiliations: Pioneer Hi-Bred (US)
Corresponding author: Shi, Jinrui
ORCID: Shi, Jinrui
Gao, Huirong
Wang, Hongyu
Lafitte, H. Renee
Archibald, Rayeann L.
Yang, Meizhu
Mo, Hua
Habben, Jeffrey E.
Venue: Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2016-08-17
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
Pages: 207-216
ISSN: 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
1467-7652
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12603
PMC: PMC5258859
OpenAlex: W2488393959
Cited by: 1,029
References: 56
Citations by year: 2026: 97 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 3
FWCI: 30.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Locations: Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Institutes of Health
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords: maize, drought stress, grain yield, CRISPR/Cas9, ethylene response, promoter replacement, allelic variation, drought tolerance breeding, gene expression
MeSH terms: Gene Editing, Base Sequence, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Ethylenes, Plant Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Stress, Physiological, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Biodiversity, Droughts, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks