Cited by 1,029CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Open access

Shi, Jinrui, Gao, Huirong, Wang, Hongyu, Lafitte, H. Renee, Archibald, Rayeann L., Yang, Meizhu, Hakimi, Salim M., Mo, Hua, Habben, Jeffrey E.·2017·Plant Biotechnology Journal

DOI 10.1111/pbi.12603PMC PMC5258859

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Maize ARGOS8 is a negative regulator of ethylene responses. A previous study has shown that transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing ARGOS8 have reduced ethylene sensitivity and improved grain yield under drought stress conditions. To explore the targeted use of ARGOS8 native expression variation in drought-tolerant breeding, a diverse set of over 400 maize inbreds was examined for ARGOS8 mRNA expression, but the expression levels in all lines were less than that created in the original ARGOS8 transgenic events. We then employed a CRISPR-Cas-enabled advanced breeding technology to generate novel variants of ARGOS8. The native maize GOS2 promoter, which confers a moderate level of constitutive expression, was inserted into the 5'-untranslated region of the native ARGOS8 gene or was used to replace the native promoter of ARGOS8. Precise genomic DNA modification at the ARGOS8 locus was verified by PCR and sequencing. The ARGOS8 variants had elevated levels of ARGOS8 transcripts relative to the native allele and these transcripts were detectable in all the tissues tested, which was the expected results using the GOS2 promoter. A field study showed that compared to the WT, the ARGOS8 variants increased grain yield by five bushels per acre under flowering stress conditions and had no yield loss under well-watered conditions. These results demonstrate the utility of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in generating novel allelic variation for breeding drought-tolerant crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12603

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. L. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,684
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics
Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., Graves, T., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178534 · Cited by 4,096
Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2969 · Cited by 2,072
Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9
Li, J., Norville, J. E., Aach, J., McCormack, M., Zhang, D., Bush, J., Church, G. M., & Sheen, J. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2654 · Cited by 1,533
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309
Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice
Jiang, W., Zhou, H., Bi, H., Fromm, M., Yang, B., & Weeks, D. P. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt780 · Cited by 1,282
High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice
Li, T., Liu, B., Spalding, M. H., Weeks, D. P., & Yang, B. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2199 · Cited by 1,149
Insensitivity to Ethylene Conferred by a Dominant Mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Bleecker, A. B., Estelle, M. A., Somerville, C. R., & Kende, H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.241.4869.1086 · Cited by 1,014

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Sorted by citations

CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture
Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., & Gao, C. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049 · Cited by 1,696
The Pivotal Role of Ethylene in Plant Growth
Dubois, M., den Broeck, L. V., & Inzé, D. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.003 · Cited by 842
Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman‐Allah, M., Olsen, M. S., & Cairns, J. E. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001 · Cited by 805
Heat and Drought Stresses in Crops and Approaches for Their Mitigation
Lamaoui, M., Jemo, M., Datla, R. S. S., & Bekkaoui, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00026 · Cited by 752
CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review
Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00985 · Cited by 619
Leaf Senescence: Systems and Dynamics Aspects
Woo, H. R., Kim, H. J., Lim, P. O., & Nam, H. G. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095859 · Cited by 574
Plant survival under drought stress: Implications, adaptive responses, and integrated rhizosphere management strategy for stress mitigation
Zia, R., Nawaz, M. S., Siddique, M. J., Hakim, S., & Imran, A. (2020) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2020.126626 · Cited by 590
Complex plant responses to drought and heat stress under climate change
Sato, H., Mizoi, J., Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K. (2024) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.16612 · Cited by 581
The Enhancement of Plant Disease Resistance Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology
Borrelli, V. M. G., Brambilla, V., Rogowsky, P., Marocco, A., & Lanubile, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01245 · Cited by 547
Generation of High-Amylose Rice through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of Starch Branching Enzymes
Sun, Y., Jiao, G., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Li, J., Guo, X., Du, W., Du, J., Francis, F., Zhao, Y., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00298 · Cited by 484
Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement
Zhang, Y., Massel, K., Godwin, I. D., & Gao, C. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y · Cited by 459
Progress and prospects in plant genome editing
Yin, K., Gao, C., & Qiu, J. (2017) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.107 · Cited by 445
De Novo Domestication: An Alternative Route toward New Crops for the Future
Fernie, A. R., & Yan, J. (2019) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2019.03.016 · Cited by 401
Insights into Drought Stress Signaling in Plants and the Molecular Genetic Basis of Cotton Drought Tolerance
Mahmood, T., Khalid, S., Abdullah, M., Ahmed, Z., Shah, M. K. N., Ghafoor, A., & Du, X. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9010105 · Cited by 389
CRISPR/Cas: A powerful tool for gene function study and crop improvement
Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Unver, T., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2020.10.003 · Cited by 373
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation
Wang, X., Tu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, Y., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12832 · Cited by 385
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 412
Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR-Cas9
Dong, O. X., Yu, S., Jain, R., Zhang, N., Duong, P. Q., Butler, C., Li, Y., Lipzen, A., Martin, J., Barry, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14981-y · Cited by 361
Gene editing in plants: progress and challenges
Mao, Y., Botella, J. R., Liu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2019) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz005 · Cited by 353
Molecular and genetic bases of heat stress responses in crop plants and breeding for increased resilience and productivity
Janni, M., Gullì, M., Maestri, E., Marmiroli, M., Valliyodan, B., Nguyen, H. T., & Marmiroli, N. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa034 · Cited by 329
Engineering abiotic stress tolerance via CRISPR/ Cas-mediated genome editing
Zafar, S. A., Zaidi, S. S., Gaba, Y., Singla-Pareek, S. L., Dhankher, O. P., Li, X., Mansoor, S., & Pareek, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz476 · Cited by 331
Towards CRISPR /Cas crops – bringing together genomics and genome editing
Scheben, A., Wolter, F., Batley, J., Puchta, H., & Edwards, D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14702 · Cited by 329
Reduced Enzymatic Browning in Potato Tubers by Specific Editing of a Polyphenol Oxidase Gene via Ribonucleoprotein Complexes Delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 System
González, M. N., Massa, G. A., Andersson, M., Turesson, H., Olsson, N., Fält, A., Storani, L., Oneto, C. A. D., Hofvander, P., & Feingold, S. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01649 · Cited by 285
Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR
Malzahn, A. A., Lowder, L. G., & Qi, Y. (2017) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4 · Cited by 288
Plant drought stress tolerance: understanding its physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms
Bashir, S. S., Hussain, A., Hussain, S. J., Wani, O. A., Sheikh, Z. N., Dar, N. A., Baloch, F. S., & Mansoor, S. (2021) · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment · doi:10.1080/13102818.2021.2020161 · Cited by 267
Use of CRISPR systems in plant genome editing: toward new opportunities in agriculture
Ricroch, A., Clairand, P., & Harwood, W. (2017) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20170085 · Cited by 252
Engineering salinity tolerance in plants: progress and prospects
Wani, S. H., Kumar, V., Khare, T., Guddimalli, R., Parveda, M., Solymosi, K., Suprasanna, P., & Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03366-6 · Cited by 233
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation
Miki, D., Zhang, W., Zeng, W., Feng, Z., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04416-0 · Cited by 254
The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity
Breed, M. F., Harrison, P. A., Blyth, C., Byrne, M. M., Gaget, V., Gellie, N. J. C., Groom, S. V. C., Hodgson, R. J., Mills, J. G., Prowse, T. A. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0152-0 · Cited by 262
Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies
Waqas, M. A., Wang, X., Zafar, S. A., Noor, M. A., Hussain, H. A., Nawaz, M. A., & Farooq, M. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10020293 · Cited by 251
Application of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for abiotic stress management in crop plants
Kumar, M., Prusty, M. R., Pandey, M. K., Singh, P. K., Bohra, A., Guo, B. Z., & Varshney, R. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1157678 · Cited by 251
Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001 · Cited by 231
Superior field performance of waxy corn engineered using CRISPR–Cas9
Gao, H., Gadlage, M. J., Lafitte, H. R., Lenderts, B., Yang, M., Schroder, M. N., Farrell, J., Snopek, K., Peterson, D., Feigenbutz, L., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0444-0 · Cited by 227
Self-citation
Developing drought‐smart, ready‐to‐grow future crops
Raza, A., Mubarik, M. S., Sharif, R., Habib, M., Jabeen, W., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Chen, Z., Siddique, K. H. M., Zhuang, W., et al. (2022) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20279 · Cited by 227
Base editing in crops: current advances, limitations and future implications
Mishra, R., Joshi, R. K., & Zhao, K. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13225 · Cited by 238
Engineering drought and salinity tolerance traits in crops through CRISPR-mediated genome editing: Targets, tools, challenges, and perspectives
Shelake, R. M., Kadam, U. S., Kumar, R., Pramanik, D., Singh, A. K., & Kim, J. (2022) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100417 · Cited by 243
Sugarcane Water Stress Tolerance Mechanisms and Its Implications on Developing Biotechnology Solutions
Ferreira, T. H. S., Tsunada, M. S., Bassi, D., Araújo, P., Mattiello, L., Guidelli, G. V., Righetto, G. L., Gonçalves, V. R., Lakshmanan, P., & Menossi, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01077 · Cited by 225
Plant Genome Engineering for Targeted Improvement of Crop Traits
Sedeek, K. E. M., Mahas, A., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00114 · Cited by 237
CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant genome editing: outstanding challenges a decade after implementation
Cardi, T., Murovec, J., Bakhsh, A., Boniecka, J., Brügmann, T., Bull, S. E., Eeckhaut, T., Fladung, M., Galović, V., Linkiewicz, A. M., et al. (2023) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.05.012 · Cited by 231
Drought-tolerant Bacillus megaterium isolated from semi-arid conditions induces systemic tolerance of wheat under drought conditions
Rashid, U., Yasmin, H., Hassan, M. N., Naz, R., Nosheen, A., Sajjad, M., Ilyas, N., Keyani, R., Jabeen, Z., Mumtaz, S., et al. (2021) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02640-x · Cited by 212
Modern Trends in Plant Genome Editing: An Inclusive Review of the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox
Razzaq, A., Saleem, F., Kanwal, M., Mustafa, G., Yousaf, S., Arshad, H. M. I., Hameed, M. K., Khan, M. S., & Joyia, F. A. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20164045 · Cited by 216
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean
Bao, A., Chen, H., Chen, L., Chen, S., Hao, Q., Guo, W., Qiu, D., Shan, Z., Yang, Z., Yuan, S., et al. (2019) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1746-6 · Cited by 204
Technological advances in maize breeding: past, present and future
Andorf, C. M., Beavis, W. D., Hufford, M. B., Smith, S. J., Suza, W. P., Wang, K., Woodhouse, M. R., Yu, J., & Lübberstedt, T. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03306-3 · Cited by 203
Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) Family Proteins in Abiotic Stresses and CRISPR–Cas9 Genome Editing of ERFs for Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Review
Debbarma, J., Sarki, Y. N., Saikia, B., Boruah, H. P. D., Singha, D. L., & Chikkaputtaiah, C. (2019) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-018-0144-x · Cited by 199
Breeding crops for drought-affected environments and improved climate resilience
Cooper, M., & Messina, C. D. (2022) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac321 · Cited by 228
First report of CRISPR/cas9 mediated dna-free editing of 4cl and rve7 genes in chickpea protoplasts
Badhan, S., Ball, A. S., & Mantri, N. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22010396 · Cited by 193
Genome Editing in Plants: Exploration of Technological Advancements and Challenges
Vats, S., Kumawat, S., Kumar, V., Patil, G., Joshi, T., Sonah, H., Sharma, T. R., & Deshmukh, R. K. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8111386 · Cited by 195
Source–Sink Regulation in Crops under Water Deficit
Rodrigues, J., Inzé, D., Nelissen, H., & Saibo, N. J. M. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.005 · Cited by 196
The CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in crop genome editing
Bao, A., Burritt, D. J., Chen, H., Zhou, X., Cao, D., & Tran, L.-S. P. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2018.1554621 · Cited by 185
Wheat root systems as a breeding target for climate resilience
Ober, E. S., Alahmad, S., Cockram, J., Forestan, C., Hickey, L. T., Kant, J., Maccaferri, M., Marr, E., Milner, M. J., Pinto, F., et al. (2021) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-021-03819-w · Cited by 184
Precise insertion and guided editing of higher plant genomes using Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases
Begemann, M. B., Gray, B. N., January, E., Gordon, G. C., He, Y., Liu, H., Wu, X., Brutnell, T. P., Mockler, T. C., & Oufattole, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11760-6 · Cited by 183
Genome editing as a tool to achieve the crop ideotype and de novo domestication of wild relatives: Case study in tomato
Zsögön, A., Čermák, T., Voytas, D. F., & Peres, L. E. P. (2016) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.12.012 · Cited by 182
Genome-Scale Sequence Disruption Following Biolistic Transformation in Rice and Maize
Liu, J., Nannas, N. J., Fu, F., Shi, J., Aspinwall, B., Parrott, W. A., & Dawe, R. K. (2019) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.18.00613 · Cited by 176
Self-citation
Drought Resistance by Engineering Plant Tissue-Specific Responses
Martignago, D., Rico‐Medina, A., Blasco‐Escámez, D., Fontanet‐Manzaneque, J. B., & Caño‐Delgado, A. I. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01676 · Cited by 173
Effects of Climate Change and Drought Tolerance on Maize Growth
Kim, K., & Lee, B. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12203548 · Cited by 208
Genome Editing—Principles and Applications for Functional Genomics Research and Crop Improvement
Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Lang, Z., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2017.1402989 · Cited by 179
Modern plant biotechnology as a strategy in addressing climate change and attaining food security
Munaweera, T. I. K., Jayawardana, N. U., Rajaratnam, R., & Dissanayake, N. M. (2022) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-022-00369-2 · Cited by 182
Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding
Hua, K., Zhang, J., Botella, J. R., Ma, C., Kong, F., Liu, B., & Zhu, J. (2019) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2019.06.009 · Cited by 177
Precise Editing of the OsPYL9 Gene by RNA-Guided Cas9 Nuclease Confers Enhanced Drought Tolerance and Grain Yield in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) by Regulating Circadian Rhythm and Abiotic Stress Responsive Proteins
Usman, B., Nawaz, G., Zhao, N., Liao, S., Liu, Y., & Li, R. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21217854 · Cited by 168
Application of Gene Editing for Climate Change in Agriculture
Karavolias, N. G., Horner, W., Abugu, M. N., & Evanega, S. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801 · Cited by 167
Genetics and genomics of root system variation in adaptation to drought stress in cereal crops
Siddiqui, M. N., Léon, J., Naz, A. A., & Ballvora, A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa487 · Cited by 165
The calcium‐dependent protein kinase ZmCDPK7 functions in heat‐stress tolerance in maize
Zhao, Y., Du, H., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Yang, S., Chao-hai, L., Chen, N., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2020) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13056 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Recent Advances for Drought Stress Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.): Present Status and Future Prospects
Sheoran, S., Kaur, Y., Kumar, S., Shukla, S., Rakshit, S., & Kumar, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.872566 · Cited by 164
TALEN ‐mediated targeted mutagenesis of more than 100 COMT copies/alleles in highly polyploid sugarcane improves saccharification efficiency without compromising biomass yield
Kannan, B., Jung, J. H., Moxley, G. W., Lee, S., & Altpeter, F. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12833 · Cited by 163
Addressing Research Bottlenecks to Crop Productivity
Reynolds, M. P., Atkin, O. K., Bennett, M. J., Cooper, M., Dodd, I. C., Foulkes, J. M., Frohberg, C., Hammer, G., Henderson, I. R., Huang, B., et al. (2021) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.011 · Cited by 177
Current and future editing reagent delivery systems for plant genome editing
Ran, Y., Liang, Z., & Gao, C. (2017) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-017-9022-1 · Cited by 163
Molecular Basis of Resistance to Fusarium Ear Rot in Maize
Lanubile, A., Maschietto, V., Borrelli, V. M. G., Stagnati, L., Logrieco, A. F., & Marocco, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01774 · Cited by 171
Abiotic Stress in Plants; Stress Perception to Molecular Response and Role of Biotechnological Tools in Stress Resistance
Imran, Q. M., Falak, N., Hussain, A., Mun, B., & Yun, B. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11081579 · Cited by 167
Genetic and molecular exploration of maize environmental stress resilience: Toward sustainable agriculture
Yang, Z., Cao, Y., Shi, Y., Qin, F., Jiang, C., & Yang, S. (2023) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2023.07.005 · Cited by 159
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean
Cheng, Q., Dong, L., Su, T., Li, T., Gan, Z., Nan, H., Lü, S., Fang, C., Kong, L., Li, H., et al. (2019) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-019-2145-8 · Cited by 148
Overexpression of zmm28 increases maize grain yield in the field
Wu, J., Lawit, S. J., Weers, B. P., Sun, J., Mongar, N., Hemert, J. V., Melo, R., Meng, X., Rupe, M. A., Clapp, J., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902593116 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
Consumer acceptance of new food trends resulting from the fourth industrial revolution technologies: A narrative review of literature and future perspectives
Hassoun, A., Cropotova, J., Trif, M., Alexandru Vasile, R. U. S. U., Bobiş, O., Nayik, G. A., Jagdale, Y. D., Saeed, F., Afzaal, M., Mostashari, P., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.972154 · Cited by 148
Current progress and challenges in crop genetic transformation
Anjanappa, R. B., & Gruissem, W. (2021) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153411 · Cited by 151
A Critical Review: Recent Advancements in the Use of CRISPR/Cas9 Technology to Enhance Crops and Alleviate Global Food Crises
Rasheed, A., Gill, R. A., Hassan, M., Mahmood, A., Qari, S. H., Zaman, Q. U., Ilyas, M., Aamer, M., Batool, M., Li, H., et al. (2021) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb43030135 · Cited by 154
Seed ‘primeomics’: plants memorize their germination under stress
Srivastava, A. K., Kumar, J. S., & Suprasanna, P. (2021) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12722 · Cited by 139
Soybean Yield Formation Physiology – A Foundation for Precision Breeding Based Improvement
Vogel, J. T., Liu, W., Olhoft, P. M., Crafts‐Brandner, S. J., Pennycooke, J. C., & Christiansen, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.719706 · Cited by 155
Engineering Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Canola, Brassica napus
Lohani, N., Jain, D., Singh, M. B., & Bhalla, P. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00003 · Cited by 143
Where are the drought tolerant crops? An assessment of more than two decades of plant biotechnology effort in crop improvement
Nuccio, M. L., Paul, M. J., Bate, N. J., Cohn, J., & Cutler, S. R. (2018) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.01.020 · Cited by 136
Precise gene replacement in rice by RNA transcript-templated homologous recombination
Li, S., Li, J., He, Y., Xu, M., Zhang, J., Du, W., Zhao, Y., & Xia, L. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0065-7 · Cited by 137
Volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes alleviated drought stress by modulating defense system in maize ( Zea mays L.)
Yasmin, H., Rashid, U., Hassan, M. N., Nosheen, A., Naz, R., Ilyas, N., Sajjad, M., Azmat, A., & Alyemeni, M. N. (2020) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.13304 · Cited by 134
CRISPR–Cas applications in agriculture and plant research
Tuncel, A., Pan, C., Clem, J. S., Liu, D., & Qi, Y. (2025) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-025-00834-3 · Cited by 145
The CRISPR/Cas revolution continues: From efficient gene editing for crop breeding to plant synthetic biology
Kumlehn, J., Pietralla, J., Hensel, G., Pacher, M., & Puchta, H. (2018) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12734 · Cited by 142
Nanocarrier-Mediated Delivery of miRNA, RNAi, and CRISPR-Cas for Plant Protection: Current Trends and Future Directions
Mujtaba, M., Wang, D., Carvalho, L. B., de Oliveira, J. L., Pereira, A. D. E. S., Sharif, R., Jogaiah, S., Paidi, M. K., Wang, L., Ali, Q., et al. (2021) · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00146 · Cited by 133
A Revolution toward Gene-Editing Technology and Its Application to Crop Improvement
Ahmar, S., Saeed, S., Khan, M. H. U., Khan, S. U., Mora-Poblete, F., Kamran, M. A., Faheem, A., Maqsood, A., Rauf, M., Saleem, S., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21165665 · Cited by 136
Technological Development and Application of Plant Genetic Transformation
Su, W., Xu, M., Radani, Y., & Yang, L. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241310646 · Cited by 131
The application of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing machinery in food and agricultural science: Current status, future perspectives, and associated challenges
Eş, İ., Gavahian, M., Martí-Quijal, F. J., Lorenzo, J. M., Khaneghah, A. M., Tsatsanis, C., Kampranis, S. C., & Barba, F. J. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.006 · Cited by 139
Breeding custom‐designed crops for improved drought adaptation
Varshney, R. K., Barmukh, R., Roorkiwal, M., Qi, Y., Kholová, J., Tuberosa, R., Reynolds, M. P., Tardieu, F., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2021) · Advanced Genetics · doi:10.1002/ggn2.202100017 · Cited by 136
CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Genome Engineering and Agriculture: Opportunities and Challenges
Baltes, N. J., Gil‐Humanes, J., & Voytas, D. F. (2017) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.03.011 · Cited by 130
CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing Technologies for Plant Improvement against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses: Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives
Wang, Y., Zafar, N., Ali, Q., Manghwar, H., Wang, G., Yu, L., Ding, X. L., Ding, F., Hong, N., Wang, G., et al. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11233928 · Cited by 141
Genome Editing in Cereals: Approaches, Applications and Challenges
Ansari, W. A., Chandanshive, S. U., Bhatt, V. D., Nadaf, A. B., Vats, S., Katara, J. L., Sonah, H., & Deshmukh, R. K. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21114040 · Cited by 138
Genome editing for plant research and crop improvement
Zhan, X., Lu, Y., Zhu, J., & Botella, J. R. (2020) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13063 · Cited by 121
CRISPR/dCas9-Based Systems: Mechanisms and Applications in Plant Sciences
Karlson, C. K. S., Noor, S. N. M., Nolte, N., & Tan, B. C. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10102055 · Cited by 139
Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops
Villalobos-López, M. Á., Arroyo-Becerra, A., Quintero-Jiménez, A., & Iturriaga, G. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms231912053 · Cited by 129
Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for Crop Improvement in Maize and Soybean
Chilcoat, N. D., Liu, Z.-B., & Sander, J. D. (2017) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.04.005 · Cited by 121
What is the available evidence for the range of applications of genome-editing as a new tool for plant trait modification and the potential occurrence of associated off-target effects: a systematic map
Modrzejewski, D., Hartung, F., Sprink, T., Krause, D., Kohl, C., & Wilhelm, R. (2019) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-019-0171-5 · Cited by 134
Particle bombardment technology and its applications in plants
Özyiğit, İ. İ., & Kurtoğlu, K. Y. (2020) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-020-06001-5 · Cited by 123
Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes
Graham, N. D., Patil, G., Bubeck, D. M., Dobert, R. C., Glenn, K. C., Gutsche, A. T., Kumar, S., Lindbo, J. A., Maas, L., May, G. D., et al. (2020) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.19.01194 · Cited by 120
A cation diffusion facilitator, GmCDF1, negatively regulates salt tolerance in soybean
Zhang, W., Liao, X., Cui, Y., Ma, W., Zhang, X., Du, H., Ma, Y., Ning, L., Wang, H., Huang, F., et al. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007798 · Cited by 116
Self-citation
CRISPR-Based Crop Improvements: A Way Forward to Achieve Zero Hunger
Ahmad, S., Tang, L., Shahzad, R., Mawia, A. M., Rao, G. S., Jamil, S., Chen, W., Sheng, Z., Shao, G., Wei, X., et al. (2021) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02653 · Cited by 125

Authors: Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Hakimi, S. M., Mo, H., & Habben, J. E.
Affiliations: Pioneer Hi-Bred (US)
Corresponding author: Shi, Jinrui
ORCID: Shi, Jinrui
Gao, Huirong
Wang, Hongyu
Lafitte, H. Renee
Archibald, Rayeann L.
Yang, Meizhu
Mo, Hua
Habben, Jeffrey E.
Venue: Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2016-08-17
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
Pages: 207-216
ISSN: 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
1467-7652
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12603
PMC: PMC5258859
OpenAlex: W2488393959
Cited by: 1,029
References: 56
Citations by year: 2026: 97 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 3
FWCI: 30.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Locations: Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Institutes of Health
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords: maize, drought stress, grain yield, CRISPR/Cas9, ethylene response, promoter replacement, allelic variation, drought tolerance breeding, gene expression
MeSH terms: Gene Editing, Base Sequence, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Ethylenes, Plant Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Stress, Physiological, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Biodiversity, Droughts, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks