Cited by 1,029CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Open access

Shi, Jinrui, Gao, Huirong, Wang, Hongyu, Lafitte, H. Renee, Archibald, Rayeann L., Yang, Meizhu, Hakimi, Salim M., Mo, Hua, Habben, Jeffrey E.·2017·Plant Biotechnology Journal

DOI 10.1111/pbi.12603PMC PMC5258859

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Maize ARGOS8 is a negative regulator of ethylene responses. A previous study has shown that transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing ARGOS8 have reduced ethylene sensitivity and improved grain yield under drought stress conditions. To explore the targeted use of ARGOS8 native expression variation in drought-tolerant breeding, a diverse set of over 400 maize inbreds was examined for ARGOS8 mRNA expression, but the expression levels in all lines were less than that created in the original ARGOS8 transgenic events. We then employed a CRISPR-Cas-enabled advanced breeding technology to generate novel variants of ARGOS8. The native maize GOS2 promoter, which confers a moderate level of constitutive expression, was inserted into the 5'-untranslated region of the native ARGOS8 gene or was used to replace the native promoter of ARGOS8. Precise genomic DNA modification at the ARGOS8 locus was verified by PCR and sequencing. The ARGOS8 variants had elevated levels of ARGOS8 transcripts relative to the native allele and these transcripts were detectable in all the tissues tested, which was the expected results using the GOS2 promoter. A field study showed that compared to the WT, the ARGOS8 variants increased grain yield by five bushels per acre under flowering stress conditions and had no yield loss under well-watered conditions. These results demonstrate the utility of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in generating novel allelic variation for breeding drought-tolerant crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12603

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., & Maniatis, T. (1989) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud · Cited by 133,589
Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual
Deininger, P. L. (1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90595-z · Cited by 84,684
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
The B73 Maize Genome: Complexity, Diversity, and Dynamics
Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., Graves, T., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1178534 · Cited by 4,096
Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2969 · Cited by 2,072
Multiplex and homologous recombination–mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9
Li, J., Norville, J. E., Aach, J., McCormack, M., Zhang, D., Bush, J., Church, G. M., & Sheen, J. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2654 · Cited by 1,533
Plant Breeding for Stress Environments
Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309
Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice
Jiang, W., Zhou, H., Bi, H., Fromm, M., Yang, B., & Weeks, D. P. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt780 · Cited by 1,282
High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice
Li, T., Liu, B., Spalding, M. H., Weeks, D. P., & Yang, B. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2199 · Cited by 1,149
Insensitivity to Ethylene Conferred by a Dominant Mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Bleecker, A. B., Estelle, M. A., Somerville, C. R., & Kende, H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.241.4869.1086 · Cited by 1,014

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 56 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Cell Line Techniques and Gene Editing Tools for Antibody Production: A Review
Dangi, A. K., Sinha, R., Dwivedi, S., Gupta, S. K., & Shukla, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00630 · Cited by 66
CRISPR-Cas9 system: A genome-editing tool with endless possibilities
Tyagi, S., Kumar, R., Das, A., Won, S. Y., & Shukla, P. (2020) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.05.008 · Cited by 71
Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations
Jansing, J., Schiermeyer, A., Schillberg, S., Fischer, R., & Bortesi, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20122888 · Cited by 66
Advances in Cereal Crop Genomics for Resilience under Climate Change
Zenda, T., Liu, S., Dong, A., & Duan, H. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11060502 · Cited by 73
CRISPR/Cas9 Technique for Temperature, Drought, and Salinity Stress Responses
Li, X., Xu, S., Aoyagi, M., Yuan, S., Iwama, T., Kobayashi, M., & Miura, K. (2022) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb44060182 · Cited by 67
Applying gene editing to tailor precise genetic modifications in plants
Eck, J. M. V. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.rev120.010850 · Cited by 69
Maize transformation: history, progress, and perspectives
Kausch, A. P., Wang, K., Kaeppler, H. F., & Gordon-Kamm, W. J. (2021) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-021-01225-0 · Cited by 63
Approaches for the amelioration of adverse effects of drought stress on crop plants
Dubey, A., Kumar, A., Malla, M. A., Chowdhary, K., Singh, G., Ravikanth, G., Mangesh, H., Sharma, S., Saati‐Santamaría, Z., Menéndez, E., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.52586/4998 · Cited by 63
Biological Parts for Engineering Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants
Lohani, N., Singh, M. B., & Bhalla, P. L. (2022) · BioDesign Research · doi:10.34133/2022/9819314 · Cited by 64
Evolution of CRISPR/Cas Systems for Precise Genome Editing
Hryhorowicz, M., Lipiński, D., & Zeyland, J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241814233 · Cited by 69
The genetic orchestra of salicylic acid in plant resilience to climate change induced abiotic stress: critical review
Elsisi, M., Elshiekh, M., Sabry, N., Aziz, M., Attia, K. A., Islam, F., Chen, J., & Abdelrahman, M. (2024) · Stress Biology · doi:10.1007/s44154-024-00160-2 · Cited by 73
Towards mastering CRISPR-induced gene knock-in in plants: Survey of key features and focus on the model Physcomitrella patens
Collonnier, C., Guyon‐Debast, A., Maclot, F., Mara, K., Charlot, F., & Nogué, F. (2017) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.04.024 · Cited by 62
Genome editing technologies and their applications in crop improvement
Mishra, R., & Zhao, K. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-018-0472-0 · Cited by 72
Identification of drought tolerant mechanisms in a drought-tolerant maize mutant based on physiological, biochemical and transcriptomic analyses
Zhang, Q., Liu, H., Wu, X., & Wang, W. (2020) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02526-w · Cited by 63
Genome editing reagent delivery in plants
Ghogare, R., Ludwig, Y., Bueno, G. M., Slamet-Loedin, I. H., & Dhingra, A. (2021) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00239-w · Cited by 61
Efficient and modular CRISPR‐Cas9 vector system for Physcomitrella patens
Mallett, D. R., Chang, M., Cheng, X., & Bezanilla, M. (2019) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.168 · Cited by 55
Involvement of DNA mismatch repair systems to create genetic diversity in plants for speed breeding programs
Karthika, V., Babitha, K. C., Kiranmai, K., Shankar, A. G., Vemanna, R. S., & Udayakumar, M. (2020) · Plant Physiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40502-020-00521-9 · Cited by 80
Hotter, drier, CRISPR: the latest edit on climate change
Massel, K., Lam, Y., Wong, A. C. S., Hickey, L. T., Borrell, A. K., & Godwin, I. D. (2021) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-020-03764-0 · Cited by 65
‘Omics’ approaches in developing combined drought and heat tolerance in food crops
Bhardwaj, A., Devi, P., Chaudhary, S., Rani, A., Jha, U. C., Kumar, S., Bindumadhava, H., Prasad, P. V. V., Sharma, K. D., Siddique, K. H. M., et al. (2021) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-021-02742-0 · Cited by 61
Drought and global hunger: biotechnological interventions in sustainability and management
Mansoor, S., Khan, T., Farooq, I., Shah, L. R., Sharma, V. K., Sonne, C., Rinklebe, J., & Ahmad, P. (2022) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-022-04006-x · Cited by 65
Genetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment
Redford, K. H., Brooks, T. M., MacFarlane, N., & Adams, J. S. (2019) · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.05.en · Cited by 69
Evolution and Application of Genome Editing Techniques for Achieving Food and Nutritional Security
Fiaz, S., Ahmar, S., Saeed, S., Riaz, A., Mora, F., & Jung, K. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22115585 · Cited by 61
An update on precision genome editing by homology-directed repair in plants
Chen, J., Li, S., He, Y., Li, J., & Xia, L. (2022) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac037 · Cited by 67
Genetic modifications associated with sustainability aspects for sustainable developments
Sharma, P., Singh, S. P., Iqbal, H. M. N., Parra‐Saldívar, R., Varjani, S., & Tong, Y. W. (2022) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2022.2061146 · Cited by 67
Complexity of combined abiotic stresses to crop plants
Khan, N. A., Owens, L., Nuñez, M. A., & Khan, A. L. (2025) · Plant Stress · doi:10.1016/j.stress.2025.100926 · Cited by 59
State-of-the-Art in CRISPR Technology and Engineering Drought, Salinity, and Thermo-tolerant crop plants
Chennakesavulu, K., Singh, H., Trivedi, P. K., Jain, M., & Yadav, S. R. (2022) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-021-02681-w · Cited by 60
Progressive Genomic Approaches to Explore Drought- and Salt-Induced Oxidative Stress Responses in Plants under Changing Climate
Billah, M., Aktar, S., Brestič, M., Živčák, M., Khaldun, A. B. M., Uddin, M. S., Bagum, S. A., Yang, X., Skalický, M., Mehari, T. G., et al. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10091910 · Cited by 58
Intended and unintended consequences of genetically modified crops – myth, fact and/or manageable outcomes?
Caradus, J. R. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2141273 · Cited by 69
From Transgenesis to Genome Editing in Crop Improvement: Applications, Marketing, and Legal Issues
Marone, D., Mastrangelo, A. M., & Borrelli, G. M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24087122 · Cited by 58
Recent developments in genome editing and applications in plant breeding
Jung, C., Capistrano-Gossmann, G. G., Braatz, J., Sashidhar, N., & Melzer, S. (2017) · Plant Breeding · doi:10.1111/pbr.12526 · Cited by 58
A critical look on CRISPR‐based genome editing in plants
Ahmad, N., Rahman, M., Mukhtar, Z., Zafar, Y., & Zhang, B. (2019) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.29052 · Cited by 59
Harnessing Advances in Agricultural Technologies to Optimize Resource Utilization in the Food-Energy-Water Nexus
Miao, R., & Khanna, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-110319-115428 · Cited by 59
Genomic and proteomic responses to drought stress and biotechnological interventions for enhanced drought tolerance in plants
Singh, P. K., Indoliya, Y., Agrawal, L., Awasthi, S., Deeba, F., Dwivedi, S. K., Chakrabarty, D., Shirke, P. A., Pandey, V., Singh, N., et al. (2022) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2022.100239 · Cited by 57
Genetic regulation of water and nutrient transport in water stress tolerance in roots
Bárzana, G., & Carvajal, M. (2020) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.10.003 · Cited by 57
Gene regulation at transcriptional and post‐transcriptional levels to combat salt stress in plants
Singh, A., & Roychoudhury, A. (2021) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.13502 · Cited by 55
Progress in gene editing tools, implications and success in plants: a review
Bhuyan, S. J., Kumar, M., Devde, P. R., Rai, A. C., Mishra, A. K., Singh, P. K., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2023.1272678 · Cited by 61
Predicting Genotype × Environment × Management (G × E × M) Interactions for the Design of Crop Improvement Strategies: Integrating Breeder, Agronomist, and Farmer Perspectives
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Tang, T., Gho, C., Powell, O. M., Podlich, D. W., Technow, F., & Hammer, G. L. (2022) · Plant Breeding Reviews · doi:10.1002/9781119874157.ch8 · Cited by 56
Breeding Potentials of Bambara Groundnut for Food and Nutrition Security in the Face of Climate Change
Olanrewaju, O. S., Oyatomi, O., Babalola, O. O., & Abberton, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.798993 · Cited by 55
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated tetra‐allelic mutation of the ‘Green Revolution’ SEMIDWARF‐1 (SD‐1) gene confers lodging resistance in tef (Eragrostis tef)
Beyene, G., Chauhan, R. D., Villmer, J., Husic, N., Wang, N., Gebre, E., Girma, D., Chanyalew, S., Assefa, K., Tabor, G., et al. (2022) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13842 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Integrating machine learning and genome editing for crop improvement
Chen, L., Liu, G., & Zhang, T. (2024) · aBIOTECH · doi:10.1007/s42994-023-00133-5 · Cited by 60
Engineering Smut Resistance in Maize by Site-Directed Mutagenesis of LIPOXYGENASE 3
Pathi, K. M., Rink, P., Budhagatapalli, N., Betz, R., Saado, I., Hiekel, S., Becker, M. A., Armin Djamei, A., & Kumlehn, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.543895 · Cited by 54
Modern Approaches for the Genetic Improvement of Rice, Wheat and Maize for Abiotic Constraints-Related Traits: A Comparative Overview
Benavente, E., & Giménez, E. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020376 · Cited by 54
Current insights and advances into plant male sterility: new precision breeding technology based on genome editing applications
Farinati, S., Draga, S., Betto, A., Palumbo, F., Vannozzi, A., Lucchin, M., & Barcaccia, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1223861 · Cited by 55
Soybean genetics, genomics, and breeding for improving nutritional value and reducing antinutritional traits in food and feed
Singer, W. M., Lee, Y., Shea, Z., Vieira, C. C., Lee, D., Li, X., Cunicelli, M. J., Kadam, S., Khan, A. W., Shannon, G. J., et al. (2023) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20415 · Cited by 66
Crop bioengineering via gene editing: reshaping the future of agriculture
Atia, M. A. M., Jiang, W., Sedeek, K., Butt, H., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2024) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-024-03183-1 · Cited by 59
Genetic dissection of maize disease resistance and its applications in molecular breeding
Zhu, M., Tong, L., Xu, M., & Zhong, T. (2021) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-021-01219-y · Cited by 54
CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing in Plants
Zhang, Y., Ma, X., Xie, X., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.03.008 · Cited by 55
Applications of CRISPR Technologies Across the Food Supply Chain
Brandt, K., & Barrangou, R. (2019) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-032818-121204 · Cited by 53
Precise gene replacement in plants through CRISPR/Cas genome editing technology: current status and future perspectives
Li, S., & Xia, L. (2019) · aBIOTECH · doi:10.1007/s42994-019-00009-7 · Cited by 55
Approach for in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas system: a recent update and future prospect
Chuang, Y.-F., Phipps, A. J., Lin, F., Hecht, V. F. G., Hewitt, A. W., Wang, P., & Liu, G. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03725-2 · Cited by 53
Cutting Edge Genetics: CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of Plant Genomes
Soyars, C. L., Peterson, B. A., Burr, C. A., & Nimchuk, Z. L. (2018) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcy079 · Cited by 50
A CRISPR way for accelerating cereal crop improvement: Progress and challenges
Basu, U., Riaz Ahmed, S., Bhat, B. A., Anwar, Z., Ali, A., Ijaz, A., Gulzar, A., Bibi, A., Tyagi, A., Nebapure, S. M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.866976 · Cited by 51
Targeted Genome Editing in Genes and cis-Regulatory Regions Improves Qualitative and Quantitative Traits in Crops
Li, X., Xie, Y., Zhu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.009 · Cited by 50
Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Rice: Constraints and Possible Solutions
Mohammed, S., Samad, A. A., & Rahmat, Z. (2019) · Rice Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2019.04.001 · Cited by 49
Sustainable Agriculture Through Technological Innovations
Sarfraz, S., Ali, F., Hameed, A., Ahmad, Z., & Riaz, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15568-0_10 · Cited by 57
Genetic dissection of drought resistance for trait improvement in crops
Liu, S., Wang, H., & Qin, F. (2023) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2023.05.002 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Genetic approaches to enhance multiple stress tolerance in maize
Malenica, N., Dunić, J. A., Vukadinović, L., Cesar, V., & Šimić, D. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12111760 · Cited by 48
Biological control: a global perspective
Maurya, R. P., Koranga, R., Samal, I., Chaudhary, D., Paschapur, A. U., Sreedhar, M., & Manimala, R. N. (2022) · International Journal of Tropical Insect Science · doi:10.1007/s42690-022-00881-9 · Cited by 48
Improving drought tolerance in maize: Tools and techniques
McMillen, M. S., Mahama, A. A., Sibiya, J., Lübberstedt, T., & Suza, W. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1001001 · Cited by 50
Drought stress in maize: stress perception to molecular response and strategies for its improvement
Singh, A. K., Pandey, H., Pandey, S., Lal, D., Chauhan, D., Aparna, Antre, S. H., Santhosh, B., & Kumar, A. (2023) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-023-01226-6 · Cited by 48
Fostering plant growth performance under drought stress using rhizospheric microbes, their gene editing, and biochar
Chauhan, P. K., Upadhyay, S. K., Rajput, V. D., Dwivedi, P., Minkina, T., & Wong, M. H. (2024) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-023-01823-1 · Cited by 49
Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9
Agarwal, A., Yadava, P., Kumar, K., Singh, I., Kaul, T., Pattanayak, A., & Agrawal, P. K. (2018) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-017-0502-3 · Cited by 48
Development and Application of Genetic Engineering for Wheat Improvement
Shrawat, A. K., & Armstrong, C. L. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2018.1514718 · Cited by 48
Identification of plant hormones and candidate hub genes regulating flag leaf senescence in wheat response to water deficit stress at the grain‐filling stage
Luo, Y., Pang, D., Jin, M., Chen, J., Kong, X., Li, W., Chang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.152 · Cited by 48
CRISPR-Cas technology in modifying food crops.
Islam, T. (2019) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr201914050 · Cited by 48
Genome Editing: A Promising Approach for Achieving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants
Kaur, N., Sharma, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., & Pati, P. K. (2022) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2022/5547231 · Cited by 47
CRISPR/Cas-mediated editing of cis-regulatory elements for crop improvement
Saeed, S., Usman, B., Shim, S., Khan, S. U., Nizamuddin, S., Qureshi, S. S., Shoaib, Y., Jeon, J., & Jung, K. (2022) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111435 · Cited by 47
Are GM Crops for Yield and Resilience Possible?
Paul, M. J., Nuccio, M. L., & Basu, S. S. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.007 · Cited by 47
SIAMESE-RELATED1 Is Regulated Posttranslationally and Participates in Repression of Leaf Growth under Moderate Drought
Dubois, M., Selden, K., Bediée, A., Rolland, G., Baumberger, N., Noir, S., Bach, L., Lamy, G., Granier, C., & Genschik, P. (2018) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.17.01712 · Cited by 46
Recent developments in multi-omics and breeding strategies for abiotic stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.)
Farooqi, M. Q. U., Nawaz, G., Wani, S. H., Choudhary, J. R., Rana, M., Sah, R. P., Afzal, M., Zahra, Z., Ganie, S. A., Razzaq, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.965878 · Cited by 50
Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement
Tariq, A., Mushtaq, M., Yaqoob, H., Bhat, B. A., Zargar, S. M., Raza, A., Ali, S., Charagh, S., Mubarik, M. S., Zaman, Q. U., et al. (2023) · GM Crops & Food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2023.2219111 · Cited by 45
Wild relatives of plants as sources for the development of abiotic stress tolerance in plants
Hossain, A., Maitra, S., Pramanick, B., Bhutia, K. L., Ahmad, Z., Moulick, D., Syed, M. A., Shankar, T., Adeel, M., Hassan, M. M., et al. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85665-2.00011-x · Cited by 44
Plant breeding for harmony between sustainable agriculture, the environment, and global food security: an era of genomics‐assisted breeding
Hafeez, A., Ali, B., Javed, M. A., Saleem, A., Fatima, M., Fathi, A., Afridi, M. S., Aydın, V., Oral, M. A., & Soudy, F. A. (2023) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-023-04252-7 · Cited by 52
Plant growth-promoting endophytic fungi of the wild halophytic rice Oryza coarctata
Airin, A. A., Arafat, M. I., Begum, R. A., Islam, M. R., & Seraj, Z. I. (2023) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s13213-023-01738-3 · Cited by 52
Improvement of millets in the post-genomic era
Krishna, T. P. A., Maharajan, T., & Ceasar, S. A. (2022) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-022-01158-8 · Cited by 44
CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanotechnology Pertinence in Agricultural Crop Refinement
Naik, B. J., Shimoga, G. D., Kim, S.-C., Manjulatha, M., Palem, R. R., Palem, R. R., Kumar, M., Kim, S., & Lee, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.843575 · Cited by 46
Roles of CRISPR to mitigate drought and salinity stresses on plants
Angon, P. B., Mondal, S., Akter, S., Sakil, M. A., & Jalil, M. A. (2023) · Plant Stress · doi:10.1016/j.stress.2023.100169 · Cited by 47
Two decades of harnessing standing genetic variation for physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in maize
Messina, C. D., Gho, C., Hammer, G., Tang, T., & Cooper, M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad231 · Cited by 47
CRISPR enables sustainable cereal production for a greener future
Ahmar, S., Usman, B., Hensel, G., Jung, K., & Gruszka, D. (2023) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.10.016 · Cited by 46
Use of GRF ‐ GIF chimeras and a ternary vector system to improve maize ( Zea mays L.) transformation frequency
Vandeputte, W., Coussens, G., Aesaert, S., Haeghebaert, J., Impens, L., Karimi, M., Debernardi, J. M., & Pauwels, L. (2024) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.16880 · Cited by 44
Integrative approaches to enhance reproductive resilience of crops for climate-proof agriculture
COST, R. (2024) · Plant Stress · doi:10.1016/j.stress.2024.100704 · Cited by 50
Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops
Chavhan, R. L., Jaybhaye, S. G., Hinge, V. R., Deshmukh, A. S., Shaikh, U. S., Jadhav, P. K., Kadam, U. S., & Hong, J. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2025.1524767 · Cited by 55
Advances in Agrobacterium transformation and vector design result in high‐frequency targeted gene insertion in maize
Peterson, D., Barone, P., Lenderts, B., Schwartz, C. S., Feigenbutz, L., Clair, G. S., Jones, S., & Svitashev, S. K. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13613 · Cited by 45
Updated scientific opinion on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis
(GMO), E. P. O. G. M. O., Mullins, E. D., Bresson, J., Dalmay, T., Dewhurst, I. C., Epstein, M. M., Firbank, L. G., Guerche, P., Hejátko, J., Moreno, F. J., et al. (2022) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7621 · Cited by 43
The future of genome editing in plants
Gilbertson, L. A., Puchta, H., & Slotkin, R. K. (2025) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-025-01956-4 · Cited by 43
Opportunities and challenges with CRISPR-Cas mediated homologous recombination based precise editing in plants and animals
Singh, S., Chaudhary, R., Deshmukh, R. K., & Tiwari, S. (2022) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-022-01321-5 · Cited by 42
Ectopic expression of ARGOS 8 reveals a role for ethylene in root‐lodging resistance in maize
Shi, J., Drummond, B. J., Habben, J. E., Brugière, N., Weers, B. P., Hakimi, S. M., Lafitte, H. R., Schussler, J. R., Mo, H., Beatty, M. K., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14131 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Crop Improvement for Circular Bioeconomy Systems
Messina, C. D., van Eeuwijk, F., Tang, T., Truong, S. K., McCormick, R. F., Technow, F., Powell, O. M., Mayor, L., Gutterson, N. I., Jones, J. W., et al. (2022) · Journal of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/ja.14912 · Cited by 43
Potential abiotic stress targets for modern genetic manipulation
Bowerman, A. F., Byrt, C. S., Roy, S. J., Whitney, S. M., Mortimer, J. C., Ankeny, R. A., Gilliham, M., Zhang, D., Millar, A. A., Rebetzke, G. J., et al. (2022) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koac327 · Cited by 41
Integrating genome editing with omics, artificial intelligence, and advanced farming technologies to increase crop productivity
Bradbury, A., Clapp, O., Biacsi, A.-S., Kuo, P. C., Gaju, O., Hayta, Ş., Zhu, J., & Lambing, C. (2025) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101386 · Cited by 44
Emerging tools and paradigm shift of gene editing in cereals, fruits, and horticultural crops for enhancing nutritional value and food security
Tiwari, M., Trivedi, P. K., & Pandey, A. K. (2020) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.258 · Cited by 42
Mechanisms and approaches towards enhanced drought tolerance in cassava (Manihot esculenta)
Muiruri, S., Ntui, V. O., Tripathi, L., & Tripathi, J. N. (2021) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100227 · Cited by 46
CRISPR-Cas-Led Revolution in Diagnosis and Management of Emerging Plant Viruses: New Avenues Toward Food and Nutritional Security
Sharma, S. K., Gupta, O. P., Pathaw, N., Sharma, D., Maibam, A., Sharma, P., Sanasam, J., Karkute, S. G., Kumar, S., & Bhattacharjee, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.751512 · Cited by 43
CRISPR/Cas9: a sustainable technology to enhance climate resilience in major Staple Crops
Kaur, N., Qadir, M., Francis, D. V., Alok, A., Tiwari, S., & Ahmed, Z. F. R. (2025) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2025.1533197 · Cited by 50
Modification of cereal plant architecture by genome editing to improve yields
Huang, X., Hilscher, J., Stöger, E., Christou, P., & Zhu, C. (2021) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-021-02668-7 · Cited by 40
Genome editing techniques in plants: a comprehensive review and future prospects toward zero hunger
Abdallah, N. A., Hamwieh, A., Radwan, K. H., Fouad, N., & Prakash, C. S. (2021) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.2021724 · Cited by 41
The Bibliometric Landscape of Gene Editing Innovation and Regulation in the Worldwide
Wei, X., Pu, A., Liu, Q., Hou, Q., Zhang, Y., An, X., Long, Y., Jiang, Y., Dong, Z., Wu, S., et al. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11172682 · Cited by 39
Metabolomics should be deployed in the identification and characterization of gene‐edited crops
Fraser, P. D., Aharoni, A., Hall, R. D., Huang, S., Giovannoni, J. J., Sonnewald, U., & Fernie, A. R. (2020) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14679 · Cited by 40
Empowering crop resilience to environmental multiple stress through the modulation of key response components
Cappetta, E., Andolfo, G., Matteo, A. D., & Ercolano, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153134 · Cited by 39
The equilibrium between sugars and ethylene is involved in shading- and drought-induced kernel abortion in maize
Shen, S., Li, B., Deng, T., Xiao, Z., Chen, X.-M., Hu, H., Zhang, B.-C., Wu, G., Li, F., Zhao, X., et al. (2020) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s10725-020-00590-8 · Cited by 39

Authors: Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Hakimi, S. M., Mo, H., & Habben, J. E.
Affiliations: Pioneer Hi-Bred (US)
Corresponding author: Shi, Jinrui
ORCID: Shi, Jinrui
Gao, Huirong
Wang, Hongyu
Lafitte, H. Renee
Archibald, Rayeann L.
Yang, Meizhu
Mo, Hua
Habben, Jeffrey E.
Venue: Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2016-08-17
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
Pages: 207-216
ISSN: 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
1467-7652
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12603
PMC: PMC5258859
OpenAlex: W2488393959
Cited by: 1,029
References: 56
Citations by year: 2026: 97 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 3
FWCI: 30.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Locations: Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: National Institutes of Health
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords: maize, drought stress, grain yield, CRISPR/Cas9, ethylene response, promoter replacement, allelic variation, drought tolerance breeding, gene expression
MeSH terms: Gene Editing, Base Sequence, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Ethylenes, Plant Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Stress, Physiological, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Biodiversity, Droughts, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR ‐Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks