Cited by 42Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy in patients with anxiety disorders in secondary‐care settings: A randomized controlled trial

Ninomiya, Akira, Sado, Mitsuhiro, Park, Sunre, Fujisawa, Daisuke, Kosugi, Teppei, Nakagawa, Atsuo, Shirahase, Joichiro, Mimura, Masaru·2020·Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Aim: The primary objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in secondary‐care settings where the vast majority of the patients have already undergone pharmacotherapy but have not remitted. Methods: Eligible participants were aged between 20 and 75 years and met the criteria for panic disorder/agoraphobia or social anxiety disorder specified in the DSM‐IV. They were randomly assigned to either the MBCT group (n = 20) or the wait‐list control group (n = 20). The primary outcome was the difference in mean change scores between pre‐ and post‐intervention assessments on the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The outcome was analyzed using an intent‐to‐treat approach and a mixed‐effect model repeated measurement. Results: We observed significant differences in mean change scores for the STAI State Anxiety subscale (difference, −10.1; 95% confidence interval, −16.9 to −3.2; P < 0.005) and STAI Trait Anxiety subscale (difference, −11.7; 95% confidence interval, −17.0 to −6.4; P < 0.001) between the MBCT and control groups. Conclusion: MBCT is effective in patients with anxiety disorders in secondary‐care settings where the vast majority of patients are treatment‐resistant to pharmacotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pcn.12960

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ninomiya, A., Sado, M., Park, S., Fujisawa, D., Kosugi, T., Nakagawa, A., Shirahase, J., & Mimura, M.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sado, Mitsuhiro
Venue
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-20
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
132-139
ISSN
  • 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1819
OpenAlex
W2990061503
Cited by
42
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K07476)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, anxiety disorders, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, treatment-resistant anxiety, pharmacotherapy, state anxiety, trait anxiety, psychotherapy effectiveness
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Aged, Agoraphobia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Secondary Health Care, Secondary Care, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review