Cited by 26Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthInfant Development and Preterm CarePalliative and Oncologic Care

In the hospital there are no care guidelines’: experiences and practices in perinatal loss in Spain

Open access
Fernández‐Alcántara, Manuel, Schul‐Martin, Laetitia, García Caro, Mª Paz, Montoya‐Juárez, Rafael, Pérez‐Marfil, Mª Nieves, Zech, Emmanuelle·2020·Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Healthcare professionals play an important role in supporting and attending to families that experience a perinatal loss. Previous research has identified the existence of obstacles that professionals may encounter during their practices. The main objective of the current research was to identify and examine the subjective experiences and practices of experienced professionals attending to perinatal loss in the hospital context in Spain. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive design. SETTING: Three different hospitals in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen professionals were interviewed, including doctors, nurses, midwives, nursing assistants, a psychologist and a funeral home manager. METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews focusing on three areas were carried out: practices with the baby-foetus, practices with parents and interaction with the team. A thematic analysis was performed using the three main focuses of the semi-structured interview (deductive approach) and the codes that emerged from the data (inductive approach). RESULTS: Regarding guideline-based care for the baby/foetus, participants made a distinction between the initial process of care for the baby and the decision-making process with parents. Where support for families was concerned, participants identified considerable variability in the practices used and lack of organisational and care guidelines, psychological support and follow-up. Finally, interactions with other team members were perceived as a source of support, although participants identified a significant lack of coordination. CONCLUSION: Participants reported variability of practices in care for the baby and parents, lack of continuity-of-care guidelines and the importance of support from a coordinated healthcare team.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/scs.12816

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hernández-Garre JM, Sánchez-Sánchez FC, Echevarría-Pérez P. Giving birth to death. Life professionals managing the bereavement. Rev Int Sociol, 2017: 75(3), 070.
  2. Guardia-Mancilla P, Montoya-Juárez R, Expósito-Ruiz M, Hueso-Montoro C, García-Caro MP, Cruz-Quintana F. Variability in professional practice among departments explains the type of end-of-life care but not the difficulty of professionals with decision-making. Estudios de Psicología/Studies in Psychology, 2017; 38(3):707-33.
  3. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol., 2018, 59(4): 508-513.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández‐Alcántara, M., Schul‐Martin, L., García Caro, M. P., Montoya‐Juárez, R., Pérez‐Marfil, M. N., & Zech, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Mind, Brain, and Behaviour Research Centre (CIMCYC) University of Granada Granada Spain
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
Corresponding author
Montoya‐Juárez, Rafael
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1063-1073
ISSN
  • 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6712
OpenAlex
W2999601060
Cited by
26
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
perinatal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death, health professionals' experiences, care practices, continuity of care, care guidelines, family support, psychological support, hospital care, Spain
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Death, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Infant, Parents, Pregnancy, Spain, Terminal Care, Qualitative Research, Infant Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review