Cited by 111Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Research TopicsMental Health via Writing

I. want you to want me: interpersonal stress and affective experiences as within-person predictors of nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide urges in daily life

Open access
Victor, Sarah E., Scott, Lori N., Stepp, Stephanie D., Goldstein, Tina R.·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate near-term risk for self-injurious urges, we evaluated how within-person changes in internalizing and externalizing negative affect, as well as interpersonal rejection and criticism, impact subsequent nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide urges in daily life. METHOD: Young adult women (N = 62) from an ongoing community cohort study with past-year self-injurious thoughts completed a 21-day ecological momentary assessment protocol. We used multilevel path analyses to model within-person effects of negative affect and interpersonal stress on subsequent suicide and NSSI urges within several hours. RESULTS: When modeled simultaneously, within-person changes in internalizing, but not externalizing, negative affect predicted later self-injurious urges. Rejection and criticism predicted later self-injurious urges, with rejection showing a unique relationship to NSSI urges specifically. Effects of rejection and criticism on later NSSI and suicide urges were mediated by internalizing negative affect; rejection also retained a significant direct effect on NSSI urges. CONCLUSION: Interpersonal stressors may be potent near-term risk factors for self-injurious urges by increasing internalizing negative affect among vulnerable individuals. The direct role of rejection and criticism on self-injurious urges is less clear, particularly for suicide. These findings have implications for understanding processes underlying self-injurious urges, as well as designing real-time interventions for these experiences in daily life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12513

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies frequently (57%, n = 13) reported that participants could provide input about their daily schedules, allowing EMA prompt windows to be adjusted for each participant.

    “Studies frequently (57%, n = 13; (47, 51, 58, 60, 61, 69, 71, 79–81, 85, 86)) reported that participants could provide input about their daily schedules (incl. sleep and wake times), allowing EMA prompt windows to be adjusted for each participant”
  • Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models, four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point, and five did not control for prior ideation.

    “Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models (47, 51, 52, 55–57, 60, 73, 74, 76, 77), four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point (47, 52, 55), and five did not control for prior ideation (51, 60, 73, 74, 76).”
  • The most consistent evidence for other predictors was found for momentary negative affect, hopelessness and burdensomeness, which predicted increased momentary suicidal ideation within-day.

    “Regarding other predictors, the most consistent evidence was found for momentary negative affect, hopelessness and burdensomeness. These variables predicted increased momentary suicidal ideation within-day (47, 56, 57, 60).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (2017). Mplus User’s Guide Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  2. Pfohl B, Blum N, & Zimmerman M (1997). Structured interview for DSM-IV personality Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victor, S. E., Scott, L. N., Stepp, S. D., & Goldstein, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, Lori N.
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1157-1177
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2888869761
Cited by
111
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (YIG‐0‐131‐14 (PI: Dr. Lori N. Scott))
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH101289, R01 MH056630, R01 MH101088, T32 MH018269‐32)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA012237)
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2013‐JF‐FX‐0058)
  • FISA Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, interpersonal stress, interpersonal rejection, criticism, within-person change, young adult women, real-time intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Cohort Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review