Cited by 51Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Education and Pedagogy

Effects of aerobic and cognitively-engaging physical activity on academic skills: A cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
De Bruijn, Anne G.M, Kostons, Danny D.N.M., Van Der Fels, Irene M.J, Visscher, Chris, Oosterlaan, Jaap, Hartman, Esther, Bosker, Roel J.·2020·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

This cluster randomized controlled trial (trial-number #) compares effects of two school-based physical activity interventions (aerobic vs. cognitively-engaging) on reading, mathematics, and spelling achievement; and whether effects are influenced by volume of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and baseline achievement. Twenty-two primary schools participated, where a third and fourth grade class were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Intervention groups were randomly assigned to a 14-week aerobic or cognitively-engaging intervention, receiving four physical education lessons a week. Control groups followed their regular physical education program. Academic achievement of 891 children (mean age 9.17 years, 49.4% boys) was assessed with standardized tests before and after the interventions. Post-Test academic achievement did not significantly differ between intervention groups and control group. A higher volume of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity resulted in better post-test mathematics achievement in both intervention groups, and post-test spelling achievement in the cognitively engaging intervention group. Compared to the control group, lower achievers in reading performed better in reading after the cognitively-engaging intervention. A combination of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and cognitively-engaging exercises seems to have the most beneficial effects. Future intervention studies should take into account quantitative and qualitative aspects of physical activity, and children's baseline academic achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2020.1756680

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the eight studies that analysed effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects, three used standardised test results, one measured mastery of the basic facts test, and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test.

    “Of the eight studies that analysed the effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects [40,48,49,50]; meanwhile, three studies utilised standardised test results [43,49,55], one took measurements of the student’s mastery of the basic facts test [47], and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test [45].”
  • De Bruijn et al. [49] reported a significant (p ≤ 0.05) dose-response relationship between increased moderate to vigorous PA and mathematics score.

    “However, the study reported a significant (p ≤ 0.05) dose–response relationship between increased moderate to vigorous PA and mathematics score”
  • De Bruijn et al. [49] reported a significant (p ≤ 0.05) dose-response relationship between moderate to vigorous, cognitively engaging PA and mathematics and spelling performance.

    “and a significant (p ≤ 0.05) dose–response relationship between moderate to vigorous, cognitively engaging PA and mathematics and spelling performance.”
  • De Bruijn et al. [49] reported that both increased cognitively engaging, moderate to vigorous PE and increased moderate to vigorous PE had no significant (p > 0.05) overall effect on academic performance (spelling, mathematics, and reading) compared to the control condition.

    “De Bruijn et al. [49] reported that both increased cognitively engaging, moderate to vigorous PE and increased moderate to vigorous PE had no significant (p > 0.05) overall effect on academic performance (spelling, mathematics, and reading) compared to the control condition.”
  • Four days of PA a week improved academic performance in the De Bruijn et al. [49] study.

    “For example, 4 days of PA a week improved academic performance in the De Bruijn et al. [49] study”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Bruijn, A. G. M., Kostons, D. D. N. M., Van Der Fels, I. M. J., Visscher, C., Oosterlaan, J., Hartman, E., & Bosker, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Groningen Institute for Educational Research, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2020-06-22
Volume
38
Issue
15
Pages
1806-1817
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W3036919245
Cited by
50
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Initiative for Education Research (405-15-410)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
school-based physical activity intervention, aerobic exercise, academic performance, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, spelling achievement, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, physical education, elementary school students, exercise volume
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Physical Education and Training, Reading, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review