Cited by 86Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Synaptogenesis in the CNS: An Odyssey from Wiring Together to Firing Together

Open access
Munno, David W., Syed, Naweed I.·2003·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

To acquire a better comprehension of nervous system function, it is imperative to understand how synapses are assembled during development and subsequently altered throughout life. Despite recent advances in the fields of neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity, relatively little is known about the mechanisms that guide synapse formation in the central nervous system (CNS). Although many structural components of the synaptic machinery are pre-assembled prior to the arrival of growth cones at the site of their potential targets, innumerable changes, central to the proper wiring of the brain, must subsequently take place through contact-mediated cell-cell communications. Identification of such signalling molecules and a characterization of various events underlying synaptogenesis are pivotal to our understanding of how a brain cell completes its odyssey from "wiring together to firing together". Here we attempt to provide a comprehensive overview that pertains directly to the cellular and molecular mechanisms of selection, formation and refinement of synapses during the development of the CNS in both vertebrates and invertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.045062

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The homophilic adhesion molecules cadherins are involved in target recognition and synaptic specificity.

    “The homophilic adhesion molecules cadherins are involved in target recognition and synaptic specificity [79].”

    From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munno, D. W., & Syed, N. I.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Syed, Naweed I.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
552
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2161440653
Cited by
86
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
synaptogenesis, central nervous system development, synaptic plasticity, growth cones, synapse refinement, neural circuit wiring, brain development, vertebrates, invertebrates
MeSH terms
Animals, Central Nervous System, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review