Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 754

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis

Open access
Birbaumer, Niels, Cohen, Leonardo G.·2007·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The review describes the status of brain–computer or brain–machine interface research. We focus on non‐invasive brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and their clinical utility for direct brain communication in paralysis and motor restoration in stroke. A large gap between the promises of invasive animal and human BCI preparations and the clinical reality characterizes the literature: while intact monkeys learn to execute more or less complex upper limb movements with spike patterns from motor brain regions alone without concomitant peripheral motor activity usually after extensive training, clinical applications in human diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and paralysis from stroke or spinal cord lesions show only limited success, with the exception of verbal communication in paralysed and locked‐in patients. BCIs based on electroencephalographic potentials or oscillations are ready to undergo large clinical studies and commercial production as an adjunct or a major assisted communication device for paralysed and locked‐in patients. However, attempts to train completely locked‐in patients with BCI communication after entering the complete locked‐in state with no remaining eye movement failed. We propose that a lack of contingencies between goal directed thoughts and intentions may be at the heart of this problem. Experiments with chronically curarized rats support our hypothesis; operant conditioning and voluntary control of autonomic physiological functions turned out to be impossible in this preparation. In addition to assisted communication, BCIs consisting of operant learning of EEG slow cortical potentials and sensorimotor rhythm were demonstrated to be successful in drug resistant focal epilepsy and attention deficit disorder. First studies of non‐invasive BCIs using sensorimotor rhythm of the EEG and MEG in restoration of paralysed hand movements in chronic stroke and single cases of high spinal cord lesions show some promise, but need extensive evaluation in well‐controlled experiments. Invasive BMIs based on neuronal spike patterns, local field potentials or electrocorticogram may constitute the strategy of choice in severe cases of stroke and spinal cord paralysis. Future directions of BCI research should include the regulation of brain metabolism and blood flow and electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain (invasive and non‐invasive). A series of studies using BOLD response regulation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and near infrared spectroscopy demonstrated a tight correlation between voluntary changes in brain metabolism and behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2903-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168161.54833.bb · DOI
  3. 10.1037/h0026998 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barber TX, 1971, Biofeedback and Self‐Control
  5. 10.1007/BF01797193 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1177/107385849900500211 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00456.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Birbaumer N, 1986, Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event‐Related Potentials, 440
  11. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90060-4 · DOI
  12. Birbaumer N, 1995, Perspectives of Event‐Related Potentials Research (EEG Suppl. 44), 450
  13. Birbaumer N, 1979, Biofeedback and Self‐Regulation
  14. 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90088-S · DOI
  15. Birbaumer N, 2005, Biologische Psychologie
  16. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.799 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/978-3-662-02728-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.518 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.518
  19. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dworkin BR, 1993, Learning and Physiological Regulation
  21. 10.1037/0735-7044.100.3.299 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2493 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/978-3-642-69379-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90034-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1126/science.163.3870.955 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Flor H, 1993, Comparison of the efficacy of EMG biofeedback, cognitive behavior therapy, and conservative medical interventions in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain, J Consult Clin Psychol, 61, 653, 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.653 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1022353731579 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gastaut H, 1952, Electrocorticographic study of the reactivity of rolandic rhythm, Rev Neurol (Paris), 87, 176
  30. Gastaut H, 1952, Study of a little electroencephalographic activity: rolandic arched rhythm, Marseille Med, 89, 296
  31. 10.1038/nn827 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hinterberger T, 2004, Auditory feedback of human EEG for direct brain‐computer communication, Proceedings
  33. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156910.32995.F4 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00411-X · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/s00221-003-1515-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04092.x · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TBME.2004.827069 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3530-6 · DOI
  39. Holland J, 1961, The Analysis of Behavior
  40. 10.1038/nature05226 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kamiya J, 1971, Biofeedback and Self‐Control.
  42. Karim AA, 2004, Effects of TMS and tDCS on the physiological regulation of cortical excitability in a brain‐computer interface, Biomedizinische Technik, 49, 55
  43. 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.834629 · DOI
  44. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.22200.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358 · Paper page
  46. 10.1053/apmr.2001.26621 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1177/1545968305276583 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lang P, 1999, International Affective Picture System
  49. Lulé D, 2007, The functional anatomy of motor execution and imagery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J Neurol
  50. 10.1007/s00415-005-0907-8 · DOI
  51. Lutzenberger W, 1980, Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behavior and Clinical Use, 427
  52. 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90005-A · DOI
  53. McGrady A, 1995, Biobehavioral Treatment of Essential Hypertension
  54. 10.1126/science.163.3866.434 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1002/ana.10848 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1038/nrn1105 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1109/TBME.2004.827677 · DOI
  58. Pfurtscheller G, 2005, Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements. A Distributed System for Distributed Functions, 367
  59. 10.1212/WNL.65.1.1 · DOI
  60. Rockstroh B, 1989, Slow Brain Potentials and Behavior
  61. Rockstroh B, 1993, et al, 63
  62. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1007/BF01000051 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Sitaram R, 2007, A brain‐computer interface using multi‐channel near infrared spectroscopy, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
  66. 10.1016/j.neuorimage.2006.11.005 · doi:10.1016/j.neuorimage.2006.11.005
  67. Skinner F, 1953, Science and Human Behavior
  68. Sterman MB, 1977, Sensorimotor EEG operant conditioning: experimental and clinical effects, Pavlov J Biol Sci, 12, 63, 10.1007/BF03004496 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90036-1 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90081-X · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1542/peds.2005-2478 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1126/science.1070291 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1017/S0140525X00058015 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/B978-012693019-1/50008-3 · DOI
  77. Walter WG, 1964, The contingent negative variation. An electrical sign of significance of association in the human brain, Science, 146, 434
  78. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1016/j.mri.2007.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00145-9 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228226.86382.5f · DOI
  82. 10.1073/pnas.0403504101 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 754

Metadata

Authors
Birbaumer, N., & Cohen, L. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-14
Volume
579
Issue
3
Pages
621-636
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1841495259
Cited by
754
References
8
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.