The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis
Open accessAbstract
The review describes the status of brain–computer or brain–machine interface research. We focus on non‐invasive brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and their clinical utility for direct brain communication in paralysis and motor restoration in stroke. A large gap between the promises of invasive animal and human BCI preparations and the clinical reality characterizes the literature: while intact monkeys learn to execute more or less complex upper limb movements with spike patterns from motor brain regions alone without concomitant peripheral motor activity usually after extensive training, clinical applications in human diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and paralysis from stroke or spinal cord lesions show only limited success, with the exception of verbal communication in paralysed and locked‐in patients. BCIs based on electroencephalographic potentials or oscillations are ready to undergo large clinical studies and commercial production as an adjunct or a major assisted communication device for paralysed and locked‐in patients. However, attempts to train completely locked‐in patients with BCI communication after entering the complete locked‐in state with no remaining eye movement failed. We propose that a lack of contingencies between goal directed thoughts and intentions may be at the heart of this problem. Experiments with chronically curarized rats support our hypothesis; operant conditioning and voluntary control of autonomic physiological functions turned out to be impossible in this preparation. In addition to assisted communication, BCIs consisting of operant learning of EEG slow cortical potentials and sensorimotor rhythm were demonstrated to be successful in drug resistant focal epilepsy and attention deficit disorder. First studies of non‐invasive BCIs using sensorimotor rhythm of the EEG and MEG in restoration of paralysed hand movements in chronic stroke and single cases of high spinal cord lesions show some promise, but need extensive evaluation in well‐controlled experiments. Invasive BMIs based on neuronal spike patterns, local field potentials or electrocorticogram may constitute the strategy of choice in severe cases of stroke and spinal cord paralysis. Future directions of BCI research should include the regulation of brain metabolism and blood flow and electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain (invasive and non‐invasive). A series of studies using BOLD response regulation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and near infrared spectroscopy demonstrated a tight correlation between voluntary changes in brain metabolism and behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Self-citationNeurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia
Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M., Mukand, J. A., Saleh, M., Caplan, A. H., Branner, A., Chen, D., Penn, R. D., & Donoghue, J. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04970 · Cited by 3,295
A unifying view of the basis of social cognition
GALLESE, V, KEYSERS, C., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002 · Cited by 2,236
A spelling device for the paralysed
Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18581 · Cited by 1,577
Self-citationDepression, Hopelessness, and Desire for Hastened Death in Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer
Breitbart, W. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.22.2907 · Cited by 1,110
Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI
deCharms, R. C., Maeda, F., Glover, G. H., Ludlow, D., Pauly, J. M., Soneji, D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Mackey, S. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505210102 · Cited by 876 · cited 1×
“DeCharms et al. (2005) reported its effects on pain perception.”
Suner, S., Fellows, M. R., Vargas-Irwin, C., Nakata, G. K., & Donoghue, J. P. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.857687 · Cited by 415 · cited 1×
“…firing activity within the motor cortex (Nicolelis, 2003) or from parietal neuronal pools (Scherberger et al. 2005) in animals and human patients (Hochberg et al. 2006) has been accomplished using densely packed microelectrode arrays of up to several hundred microelectrodes (Suner et al. 2005).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-2903-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168161.54833.bb · DOI
- 10.1037/h0026998 · DOI · Paper page
- Barber TX, 1971, Biofeedback and Self‐Control
- 10.1007/BF01797193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/107385849900500211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00456.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Birbaumer N, 1986, Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event‐Related Potentials, 440
- 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90060-4 · DOI
- Birbaumer N, 1995, Perspectives of Event‐Related Potentials Research (EEG Suppl. 44), 450
- Birbaumer N, 1979, Biofeedback and Self‐Regulation
- 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90088-S · DOI
- Birbaumer N, 2005, Biologische Psychologie
- 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-662-02728-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.518 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.518
- 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x · DOI · Paper page
- Dworkin BR, 1993, Learning and Physiological Regulation
- 10.1037/0735-7044.100.3.299 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2493 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-69379-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90034-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.163.3870.955 · DOI · Paper page
- Flor H, 1993, Comparison of the efficacy of EMG biofeedback, cognitive behavior therapy, and conservative medical interventions in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain, J Consult Clin Psychol, 61, 653, 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.653 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022353731579 · DOI · Paper page
- Gastaut H, 1952, Electrocorticographic study of the reactivity of rolandic rhythm, Rev Neurol (Paris), 87, 176
- Gastaut H, 1952, Study of a little electroencephalographic activity: rolandic arched rhythm, Marseille Med, 89, 296
- 10.1038/nn827 · DOI · Paper page
- Hinterberger T, 2004, Auditory feedback of human EEG for direct brain‐computer communication, Proceedings
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156910.32995.F4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00411-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00221-003-1515-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04092.x · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2004.827069 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-3530-6 · DOI
- Holland J, 1961, The Analysis of Behavior
- 10.1038/nature05226 · DOI · Paper page
- Kamiya J, 1971, Biofeedback and Self‐Control.
- Karim AA, 2004, Effects of TMS and tDCS on the physiological regulation of cortical excitability in a brain‐computer interface, Biomedizinische Technik, 49, 55
- 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.834629 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.22200.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358 · Paper page
- 10.1053/apmr.2001.26621 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1545968305276583 · DOI · Paper page
- Lang P, 1999, International Affective Picture System
- Lulé D, 2007, The functional anatomy of motor execution and imagery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J Neurol
- 10.1007/s00415-005-0907-8 · DOI
- Lutzenberger W, 1980, Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behavior and Clinical Use, 427
- 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90005-A · DOI
- McGrady A, 1995, Biobehavioral Treatment of Essential Hypertension
- 10.1126/science.163.3866.434 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.10848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrn1105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TBME.2004.827677 · DOI
- Pfurtscheller G, 2005, Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements. A Distributed System for Distributed Functions, 367
- 10.1212/WNL.65.1.1 · DOI
- Rockstroh B, 1989, Slow Brain Potentials and Behavior
- Rockstroh B, 1993, et al, 63
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01000051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Sitaram R, 2007, A brain‐computer interface using multi‐channel near infrared spectroscopy, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
- 10.1016/j.neuorimage.2006.11.005 · doi:10.1016/j.neuorimage.2006.11.005
- Skinner F, 1953, Science and Human Behavior
- Sterman MB, 1977, Sensorimotor EEG operant conditioning: experimental and clinical effects, Pavlov J Biol Sci, 12, 63, 10.1007/BF03004496 · DOI
- 10.1016/0149-7634(81)90036-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90080-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0014-4886(62)90081-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90028-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1542/peds.2005-2478 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1070291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0140525X00058015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-012693019-1/50008-3 · DOI
- Walter WG, 1964, The contingent negative variation. An electrical sign of significance of association in the human brain, Science, 146, 434
- 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2005.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.mri.2007.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00145-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228226.86382.5f · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0403504101 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
EEG and MEG: Relevance to Neuroscience
Lopes da Silva, F. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.017 · Cited by 900
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation
Chaudhary, U., Birbaumer, N., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113 · Cited by 928
Self-citationConvolutional Neural Networks for P300 Detection with Application to Brain-Computer Interfaces
Cecotti, H., & Graser, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.125 · Cited by 778
Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke
Buch, E., Weber, C., Cohen, L. G., Braun, C., Dimyan, M. A., Ard, T., Mellinger, J., Caria, A., Soekadar, S., Fourkas, A., et al. (2008) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.505313 · Cited by 600
Self-citationReal-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges
Sulzer, J., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Weiskopf, N., Birbaumer, N., Blefari, M. L., Bruehl, A. B., Cohen, L. G., deCharms, R. C., Gassert, R., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033 · Cited by 453
Self-citationNoninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control
Edelman, B. J., Meng, J., Suma, D., Zurn, C., Nagarajan, E., Baxter, B. S., Cline, C. C., & He, B. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aaw6844 · Cited by 380
Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities
Saha, S., Mamun, K. A., Ahmed, K., Mostafa, R., Naik, G. R., Darvishi, S., Khandoker, A. H., & Baumert, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2021.578875 · Cited by 365
The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology
Blankertz, B., Tangermann, M., Vidaurre, C., Fazli, S., Sannelli, C., Haufe, S., Maeder, C., Ramsey, L., Sturm, I., Curio, G., et al. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00198 · Cited by 357
BCI demographics: how many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI?
Allison, B., Luth, T., Valbuena, D., Teymourian, A., Volosyak, I., & Graser, A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2009.2039495 · Cited by 344
Single-trial EEG classification of motor imagery using deep convolutional neural networks
Tang, Z., Li, C., & Sun, S. (2017) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.117 · Cited by 299
Daly, J. J., Cheng, R., Rogers, J., Litinas, K., Hrovat, K., & Dohring, M. (2009) · Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/npt.0b013e3181c1fc0b · Cited by 274
Deep Representation-Based Domain Adaptation for Nonstationary EEG Classification
Zhao, H., Zheng, Q., Ma, K., Li, H., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3010780 · Cited by 253
Brain–computer interface–based communication in the completely locked-in State
Chaudhary, U., Xia, B., Silvoni, S., Cohen, L. G., & Birbaumer, N. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002593 · Cited by 235
Self-citationRetractedMugler, E. M., Patton, J. L., Flint, R. D., Wright, Z. A., Schuele, S. U., Rosenow, J., Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J., & Slutzky, M. W. (2014) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035015 · Cited by 192
Real-time fMRI brain computer interfaces: Self-regulation of single brain regions to networks
Ruiz, S., Buyukturkoglu, K., Rana, M., Birbaumer, N., & Sitaram, R. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010 · Cited by 187
Self-citationNeuroimaging-based approaches in the brain–computer interface
Min, B.-K., Marzelli, M. J., & Yoo, S.-S. (2010) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.08.002 · Cited by 150
Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke
Sellers, E. W., Ryan, D. B., & Hauser, C. K. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3007801 · Cited by 140
Neurofeedback: One of today's techniques in psychiatry?
Arns, M., Batail, J.-M., Bioulac, S., Congedo, M., Daudet, C., Drapier, D., Fovet, T., Jardri, R., Le-Van-Quyen, M., Lotte, F., et al. (2017) · L'Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2016.11.003 · Cited by 117
High-resolution EEG techniques for brain-computer interface applications
Cincotti, F., Mattia, D., Aloise, F., Bufalari, S., Astolfi, L., De Vico Fallani, F., Tocci, A., Bianchi, L., Marciani, M. G., Gao, S., et al. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.031 · Cited by 115
How feedback, motor imagery, and reward influence brain self‐regulation using real‐time fMRI
Sepulveda, P., Sitaram, R., Rana, M., Montalba, C., Tejos, C., & Ruiz, S. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23228 · Cited by 90
Höhne, J., Holz, E., Staiger-Sälzer, P., Müller, K.-R., Kübler, A., & Tangermann, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104854 · Cited by 85
Deep brain stimulation: current and future perspectives
Awan, N. R., Lozano, A., & Hamani, C. (2009) · Neurosurgical Focus · doi:10.3171/2009.4.focus0982 · Cited by 83
Verbal communication impacts quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Felgoise, S. H., Zaccheo, V., Duff, J., & Simmons, Z. (2016) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.3109/21678421.2015.1125499 · Cited by 81
Towards a user-friendly brain-computer interface: initial tests in ALS and PLS patients
Bai, O., Lin, P., Huang, D., Fei, D.-Y., & Floeter, M. K. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.157 · Cited by 80
Core-Brain-Network-Based Multilayer Convolutional Neural Network for Emotion Recognition
Gao, Z., Li, R., Ma, C., Rui, L., & Sun, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3090164 · Cited by 61
Deshpande, G., Rangaprakash, D., Oeding, L., Cichocki, A., & Hu, X. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00246 · Cited by 29
A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection
Wang, H., Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Yuan, Z., Xu, T., & Li, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2024.3415474 · Cited by 20
Brain-computer interface: a possible help for people with locked-in syndrome,
Nolte, A. (2021) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72254-8_24 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Birbaumer, N., & Cohen, L. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-14
- Volume
- 579
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-636
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1841495259
- Cited by
- 754
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
