The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Open accessAbstract
Native speakers of Japanese learning English generally have difficulty differentiating the phonemes /r/ and /l/, even after years of experience with English. Previous research that attempted to train Japanese listeners to distinguish this contrast using synthetic stimuli reported little success, especially when transfer to natural tokens containing /r/ and /l/ was tested. In the present study, a different training procedure that emphasized variability among stimulus tokens was used. Japanese subjects were trained in a minimal pair identification paradigm using multiple natural exemplars contrasting /r/ and /l/ from a variety of phonetic environments as stimuli. A pretest-posttest design containing natural tokens was used to assess the effects of training. Results from six subjects showed that the new procedure was more robust than earlier training techniques. Small but reliable differences in performance were obtained between pretest and posttest scores. The results demonstrate the importance of stimulus variability and task-related factors in training nonnative speakers to perceive novel phonetic contrasts that are not distinctive in their native language.
Verifying this paper
8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back
- Registry recordVerified
- Full textRead the full text
- Reference list25 references found
- Reference checkChecking each cited work — 31 of 31
- StatisticsNeeds the full text
- ClaimsNeeds the full text
- Cited sourcesNeeds claims to check
- Self-checkNeeds the full text
- VerificationFindings verified
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adult performance on non-native contrasts could be increased by a number of factors: (i) the use of techniques that minimize the effects of memory (33, 34), (ii) extensive training (35, 36), and (iii) the use of contrasts, such as Zulu clicks, that are not related to native-language categories (37, 38).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,207
On the genesis of abstract ideas.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025953 · Cited by 1,983
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044417 · Cited by 1,692
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211209 · Cited by 689
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.345 · Cited by 672
Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”
Goto, H. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3 · Cited by 620
Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels
Pisoni, D. B. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214136 · Cited by 608
Self-citationDevelopmental Aspects of Cross-Language Speech Perception
Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129249 · Cited by 553 · cited 3×
“Nonlinguistic dimensions include within-talker variability [e.g., multiple natural exemplars from the same talker (Werker et al., 1981)] and between-talker variability [e.g., synthetic stimuli modeled after adult male, adult female, and children’s voices (Kuhl, 1983)].”
BackgroundMethodSome effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition
Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.397688 · Cited by 540
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abramson A, Lisker L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Academia, Prague. 1970. pp. 569–573. [Google Scholar]
- Aslin R, Pisoni D. Some developmental processes in speech perception. In: Yeni-Komshian G, Kavanagh J, Ferguson C, editors. Child Phonology Perception and Production. Academic; New York: 1980. pp. 67–96. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson R. Ingredients for a theory of instruction. Am Psychol. 1972;27:921–931. [Google Scholar]
- Flege J. The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In: Winitz H, editor. Human Communication and Its Disorders, A Review. Ablex; Norwood, NJ: 1988. pp. 224–401. [Google Scholar]
- Gillette S. Minn Papers Ling Philos Lang. Vol. 6. University of Minnesota; Minneapolis: 1980. Contextual variation in the perception of L and R by Japanese and Korean speakers; pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
- Jusczyk P. Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. Paper presented at International Conference on Phonological Development; Stanford University. 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhl P. Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Inf Behav Dev. 1983;6:263–285. [Google Scholar]
- Lehiste I. Acoustic characteristics of selected English consonants. Int J Am Ling. 1964;30:10–115. [Google Scholar]
- Lively S, Logan J, Pisoni D. Res Speech Percept, Prog Rep No 16. Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University; Bloomington: 1990. An acoustic analyses of /r/ and /l/ across phonetic environments and talkers. [Google Scholar]
- Lively S, Pisoni D, Logan J. Some effects of training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ In: Tohkura Yohichi., editor. Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic structure. OHM; Tokyo: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
- Mochizuki M. The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. J Phon. 1981;9:283–303. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni D, Logan J, Lively S. Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In: Nusbaum H, Goodman J, editors. Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Recognizing Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. MIT; Cambridge. MA: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
- Samuel A. The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Percept Psychophys. 1977;22:321–330. [Google Scholar]
- Shiffrin R. Attention. In: Atkinson R, Herrnstein R, Lindzey G, Luce R, editors. Steven’s Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 2. Vol. 2. Wiley; New York: 1988. pp. 739–811. Learning and Cognition. [Google Scholar]
- Strange W. Speech input and the development of speech perception. In: Kavanagh J, editor. Otitis Media and Child Development. York; Parkton, MD: 1986. pp. 12–26. [Google Scholar]
- Terbeek D. UCLA Work Pap Phon. Vol. 37. UCLA; Los Angeles: 1977. A. cross-language multidimensional scaling study of vowel perception. [Google Scholar]
- Webster’s Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. Library Reproduction Service; Los Angeles: 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Werker J. Becoming a native listener. Am Sci. 1989;77:54–59. [Google Scholar]
- Werker J. The ontogeny of speech perception. In: Mattingly I, Studdert-Kennedy M, editors. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1990. (in press) [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 912
Effects of Perceptual Training on Korean Three-way Phoneme Distinction.
Park, S.-H. (2011) · 한국어 교육 · doi:10.18209/iakle.2011.22.2.139 · Cited by 6
Feasibility of Audio Training for Identification of Auditory Signatures of Small Arms Fire
Fluitt, K. F., Gaston, J. R., Karna, V., & Letowski, T. R. (2010) · Cited by 6
A quantitative model of first language influence in second language consonant learning
Gong, J., Cooke, M. P., & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (2015) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2015.02.003 · Cited by 6
The role of visual cues in L2 consonant perception
Sennema, A., Hazan, V. L., & Faulkner, A. (2003) · Cited by 6
Lexical and Segmental Influences on Child and Adult Learners' Production of Second Language Vowels
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2008) · Cited by 6
Brain plasticity and phonetic training for English-as-a-second-language learners
Zhang, Y., & Cheng, B. (2011) · Cited by 5
Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts in adults and children
Heeren, W. F. L. (2006) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 6
Testing the importance of talker variability in non-native speech contrast training
Magnuson, J. S., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Bradlow, A. R. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412450 · Cited by 6
The role of vowel hyperarticulation in clear speech to foreigners and infants
Kangatharan, J. (2015) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · Cited by 6
Inductive inference in non-native speech processing and learning
Pająk, B. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Brekelmans, G., Lavan, N., Saito, H., Clayards, M. A., & Wonnacott, E. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gs7y9 · Cited by 6
Jackendoff, R. S. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.3 · Cited by 6
Cross-Linguistic Perception and Learning of Japanese Lexical Prosody by English Listeners.
Shport, I. A. (2011) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · Cited by 6
Li, Y. (2023) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2023.2285776 · Cited by 5
Zhang, W., Liao, Y., & Truong, H. T. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688241282259 · Cited by 7
The impact of talker variability and individual differences on word learning in adults
Adas, S. A. E., Yen, I., & Levi, S. V. (2025) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149454 · Cited by 5
Analysis of L2 Learners’ Progress of Distinguishing Mandarin Tone 2 and Tone 3
Sun, Y., Kyaw, W. T., Zhang, J., & Sagisaka, Y. (2018) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-1983 · Cited by 5
Non-native consonant acquisition in noise: Effects of exposure/test similarity
Cooke, M. P., & Lecumberri, M. L. G. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5116575 · Cited by 5
Cowan, T. M., & Olmstead, A. J. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8010067 · Cited by 5
Investigating the Effects of Speaker Variability on Arabic children’s Acquisition of English Vowels
Alshangiti, W., Evans, B. G., & Wibrow, M. (2023) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol14no1.1 · Cited by 5
Montanari, S., Steffman, J., & Mayr, R. (2023) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101276 · Cited by 5
Lee, J., & Park, H. (2024) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101327 · Cited by 5
Alshangiti, W., & Evans, B. G. (2024) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0026451 · Cited by 5
Mahmood, R. Q., & Bui, H. P. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63447-5_6 · Cited by 6
Auditory memory distortion for spoken prose.
Hutchison, J. L., Hubbard, T. L., Ferrandino, B., Brigante, R. M., Wright, J. M., & Rypma, B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0028464 · Cited by 5
Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004) · Cited by 5
Self-citationHendrickson, A., Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 5
Auditory Training: Predictors of Success and Optimal Training Paradigms
Ingvalson, E. M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2788-3_19 · Cited by 5
Effects of practice variability on second-language speech production training
Bu, L., Nagano, M., Harel, D., & McAllister, T. (2020) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000510621 · Cited by 7
Evaluieren und Prüfen in DaF / DaZ
Grein, M., Fierus, A.-K., Jehle, N., Anguix, V. S., Ziegler, J., & Riedinger, M. (2020) · Frank & Timme eBooks · doi:10.26530/20.500.12657/43132 · Cited by 5
Audiovisual English /r/−/l/ Identification Training for Japanese-Speaking Adults and Children
Shinohara, Y. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00506 · Cited by 4
Behavioral effect of mismatch negativity neurofeedback on foreign language learning
Chang, M., Ando, H., Maeda, T., & Naruse, Y. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254771 · Cited by 5
Saloranta, A., Heikkola, L. M., & Peltola, M. S. (2022) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09868-6 · Cited by 5
Memory-card vowel training for child and adult second-language learners: A first report
Iverson, P., Herrero, B. P., & Katashima, A. (2023) · JASA Express Letters · doi:10.1121/10.0016836 · Cited by 5
Kinzuka, Y., Minami, T., & Nakauchi, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65020-1 · Cited by 5
Lexically-guided perceptual learning does generalize to new phonetic contexts
Nelson, S., & Durvasula, K. (2020) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101019 · Cited by 5
Adaptive clustering models of categorization
McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921322.010 · Cited by 6
Using non-native error patterns to improve pronunciation verification
van Doremalen, J., Catia Cucchiarini, A., & Strik, H. (2010) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-230 · Cited by 5
ENHANCING ACOUSTIC CUES TO AID L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION
Ortega-Llebaría, M., & Hazan, V. L. (1999) · Cited by 5
Lexical tone perception and production : the role of language and musical background
Schwanhäuβer, B. (2007) · Cited by 5
TRAINING SPANISH SPEAKERS IN THE PERCEPTION AND PRODUCTION OF ENGLISH VOWELS
Pérez, G., & Maria, G. (2003) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 5
Learning non-native vowel categories
Kingston, J. K. C., Bartels, C., Benkı́, J. R., Moore, D., Rice, J., Thorburn, R., & Macmillan, N. A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.1109/icslp.1996.607915 · Cited by 5
Perceptual training of English /r/ and /l/ for Japanese adults, adolescents and children
Shinohara, Y. (2014) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 5
Contributions of pragmatics to word learning and interpretation
Grigoroglou, M., & Anna Papafragou, A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.21 · Cited by 6
Advancements of Phonetics in the 21st century: Quantitative data analysisPreprint
Sonderegger, M., & Sóskuthy, M. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mc6a9 · Cited by 5
Optimizing L2 phonetic learning
Saito, K., & Chen, S. (2025) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263125101447 · Cited by 5
Li, Y. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231219773 · Cited by 4
Learning a language with vowelless words
Zellou, G., Barreda, S., Lahrouchi, M., & Smiljanić, R. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105909 · Cited by 4
Shejaeya, G. A., Roon, K. D., & Whalen, D. H. (2024) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101369 · Cited by 4
The Effectiveness of Interactive Instruction on the Intonation Learning of Chinese College Learners
Liu, Y. (2008) · Cross-cultural communication · doi:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020080401.011 · Cited by 4
Effects of English /r/-/l/ perceptual training on Japanese children's production.
Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2015) · ICPhS · Cited by 4
Perceptual Assimilation of OccludedVoiced Stops by Spanish Listeners
Rohena-Madrazo, M. (2013) · Cited by 4
Do non-native speakers use context speaking rate in spoken word recognition?
Baese‐Berk, M. M., Morrill, T. H., & Dilley, L. C. (2016) · Speech prosody · doi:10.21437/speechprosody.2016-201 · Cited by 4
Gong, J. C., Yang, Z., Bellamy, W., Wang, F., & Ji, X. (2020) · International Conference on Asian Language Processing · doi:10.1109/ialp51396.2020.9310467 · Cited by 4
English vowel perception by non-native speakers: impact of audio and visual training modalities
Reyes, Y. P., & Hazan, V. L. (2021) · ONOMAZEIN · doi:10.7764/onomazein.51.04 · Cited by 4
Wanrooij, K., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101082 · Cited by 6
Feng, Z. (2020) · Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL · doi:10.52214/salt.v20i2.7476 · Cited by 4
Training novel phonemic contrasts: a comparison of identification and oddity discrimination training
Handley, Z. L., Sharples, M., & Moore, D. (2009) · ISCA Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE) · doi:10.21437/slate.2009-31 · Cited by 4
The perception and production of palatal codas by Korean L2 learners of English
Huensch, A. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 4
Perception of Fricatives by Dutch and English Speakers
Johnson, K. A., & Babel, M. (2007) · UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports · doi:10.5070/p79sf875pc · Cited by 4
Auditory-perceptual training using a simulation of a cochlear-implant system: a controlled study
Stacey, P. C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2005) · Cited by 4
Lengeris, Α., & Nicolaidis, K. (2015) · Proceedings of meetings on acoustics · doi:10.1121/2.0000025 · Cited by 4
Cross-Language Perception of German Vowels by Speakers of American English
Schultheiss, L. K. G. (2008) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 4
Lengeris, Α., & Nicolaidis, K. (2014) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4899580 · Cited by 4
Tateishi, M. (2013) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.5072/prism/25835 · Cited by 4
Perception of Indexical Properties of Speech by Children
Levi, S. V. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119184096.ch17 · Cited by 4
Brekelmans, G., Evans, B. G., & Wonnacott, E. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/63dhn · Cited by 4
Infants’ Learning of Speech Sounds and Word-Forms
Swingley, D. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.6 · Cited by 4
Landau, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.5 · Cited by 4
Lexical processing of foreign-accented speech: Rapid and flexible adaptation
Witteman, M. J. (2013) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 4
Input, Universals, and Transfer in Developing Rhotics: A Sketch in Bilingualism
Babatsouli, E. (2024) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages9100328 · Cited by 3
Cheng, B., Liao, K., Xiang, Y., Zou, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2571696 · Cited by 3
Input multiplicity and the robustness of phonological categories in child L2 phonology acquisition
Leung, A. H. (2014) · Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) · Cited by 3
Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. M. (2024) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.1080/25742442.2024.2345568 · Cited by 3
Zhang, H., Xu, L., Ma, W., Han, J., Wang, Y., Ding, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0030466 · Cited by 3
Pelzl, E. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02646-0 · Cited by 3
Chan, A. Y. W. (2013) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2013.33025 · Cited by 3
Jügler, J., Zimmerer, F., Möbius, B., & Draxler, C. (2015) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2015-255 · Cited by 3
The lexicon and phonetic categories: Change is bad, change is necessary
Samuel, A. G. (2011) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110224931.33 · Cited by 3
Training Japanese Speakers to Identify Nasal Codas of Mandarin Chinese
Yang, R., Nanjo, H., & Danstuji, M. (2018) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.0901.02 · Cited by 3
The influence of a first language: training nonnative listeners on voicing contrasts
Tuninetti, A., & Tokowicz, N. (2018) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1421318 · Cited by 3
Beghoul, Y. (2017) · مجلة العلوم الإنسانية · doi:10.34174/0079-000-048-075 · Cited by 3
Framing the Teaching of Pronunciation
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson‐Revell, P. (2018) · Research and practice in applied linguistics · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_3 · Cited by 3
Pronunciation in the Classroom: Teachers and Teaching Methods
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson‐Revell, P. (2018) · Research and practice in applied linguistics · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_4 · Cited by 7
Relating Pronunciation Research and Practice
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson‐Revell, P. (2018) · Research and practice in applied linguistics · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_8 · Cited by 3
McMurray, B., Roembke, T. C., & Hazeltine, E. (2018) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2018.1526176 · Cited by 3
Isasa, A. I. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7010007 · Cited by 3
Chen, S., Li, B., He, Y., Chen, S., Yang, Y., & Zhou, F. (2022) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2022.02.008 · Cited by 3
Processing of English Coda Laterals in L2 Listeners: An Eye-Tracking Study
Wang, Y. (2023) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309231203899 · Cited by 3
Alfotais, A., Mahdi, H. S., & Alkhammash, R. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0034853 · Cited by 3
Does phonetic training benefit word learning?
Ge, Y., Correia, S., Fernandes, J. D., Hanson, K., Rato, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2026) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263125101459 · Cited by 3
Phoneme acquisition: Infants and second language learners
Jensen, J. (2011) · The Language Teacher · doi:10.37546/jalttlt35.6-4 · Cited by 3
An Acoustic Way to Support Japanese Children’s Effective English Learning in School Classrooms
Evans, N., Kaneko, M., Seleznov, I., Shigematsu, T., & Kiyono, K. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11136062 · Cited by 3
A Web-Based High Variability Phonetic Training Application for French Vowels
Inceoglu, S. (2022) · Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (PSLLT) · doi:10.31274/psllt.13336 · Cited by 3
Brawerman-Albini, A., Kluge, D. C., & Silva, A. H. P. (2019) · Revista Linguagem & Ensino · doi:10.15210/rle.v16i1.15436 · Cited by 3
An Acoustical Analysis of a Japanese Speakers Production of English /r/ and /l/
Kinnaird, S. K., & Zapf, J. A. (2014) · Cited by 3
Identification of English /r/ and /l/ in white noise by native and non-native listeners.
Ueda, K., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Komaki, R. (2002) · Nippon Onkyo Gakkaishi/Acoustical science and technology/Nihon Onkyo Gakkaishi · doi:10.1250/ast.23.336 · Cited by 3
Kim, Y., Koh, S., & Hazan, V. L. (2012) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2012.4.3.025 · Cited by 3
CVC syllables for investigating the phonetic sensitivity of Mandarin and English speakers
Munro, M. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.1.147 · Cited by 3
Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners
Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Fitzgerald, B. H., & Kubo, R. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.1109/icslp.1996.607307 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- ORCID
- Pisoni, David B.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 874-886
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- PMC
- PMC3518834
- OpenAlex
- W2037249514
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC-000111, DC-00111-13, F32DC000111, K08DC000111)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- Japanese listeners, stimulus variability, non-native speech perception, English as a second language
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Asian, Attention, Generalization, Stimulus, Humans, Indiana, Japan, Language, Phonetics, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review