The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Open accessAbstract
Native speakers of Japanese learning English generally have difficulty differentiating the phonemes /r/ and /l/, even after years of experience with English. Previous research that attempted to train Japanese listeners to distinguish this contrast using synthetic stimuli reported little success, especially when transfer to natural tokens containing /r/ and /l/ was tested. In the present study, a different training procedure that emphasized variability among stimulus tokens was used. Japanese subjects were trained in a minimal pair identification paradigm using multiple natural exemplars contrasting /r/ and /l/ from a variety of phonetic environments as stimuli. A pretest-posttest design containing natural tokens was used to assess the effects of training. Results from six subjects showed that the new procedure was more robust than earlier training techniques. Small but reliable differences in performance were obtained between pretest and posttest scores. The results demonstrate the importance of stimulus variability and task-related factors in training nonnative speakers to perceive novel phonetic contrasts that are not distinctive in their native language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adult performance on non-native contrasts could be increased by a number of factors: (i) the use of techniques that minimize the effects of memory (33, 34), (ii) extensive training (35, 36), and (iii) the use of contrasts, such as Zulu clicks, that are not related to native-language categories (37, 38).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,207
On the genesis of abstract ideas.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025953 · Cited by 1,983
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044417 · Cited by 1,692
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211209 · Cited by 689
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.345 · Cited by 672
Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”
Goto, H. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3 · Cited by 620
Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels
Pisoni, D. B. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214136 · Cited by 608
Self-citationDevelopmental Aspects of Cross-Language Speech Perception
Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129249 · Cited by 553 · cited 3×
“Nonlinguistic dimensions include within-talker variability [e.g., multiple natural exemplars from the same talker (Werker et al., 1981)] and between-talker variability [e.g., synthetic stimuli modeled after adult male, adult female, and children’s voices (Kuhl, 1983)].”
BackgroundMethodSome effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition
Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.397688 · Cited by 540
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abramson A, Lisker L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Academia, Prague. 1970. pp. 569–573. [Google Scholar]
- Aslin R, Pisoni D. Some developmental processes in speech perception. In: Yeni-Komshian G, Kavanagh J, Ferguson C, editors. Child Phonology Perception and Production. Academic; New York: 1980. pp. 67–96. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson R. Ingredients for a theory of instruction. Am Psychol. 1972;27:921–931. [Google Scholar]
- Flege J. The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In: Winitz H, editor. Human Communication and Its Disorders, A Review. Ablex; Norwood, NJ: 1988. pp. 224–401. [Google Scholar]
- Gillette S. Minn Papers Ling Philos Lang. Vol. 6. University of Minnesota; Minneapolis: 1980. Contextual variation in the perception of L and R by Japanese and Korean speakers; pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
- Jusczyk P. Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. Paper presented at International Conference on Phonological Development; Stanford University. 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhl P. Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Inf Behav Dev. 1983;6:263–285. [Google Scholar]
- Lehiste I. Acoustic characteristics of selected English consonants. Int J Am Ling. 1964;30:10–115. [Google Scholar]
- Lively S, Logan J, Pisoni D. Res Speech Percept, Prog Rep No 16. Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University; Bloomington: 1990. An acoustic analyses of /r/ and /l/ across phonetic environments and talkers. [Google Scholar]
- Lively S, Pisoni D, Logan J. Some effects of training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ In: Tohkura Yohichi., editor. Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic structure. OHM; Tokyo: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
- Mochizuki M. The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. J Phon. 1981;9:283–303. [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni D, Logan J, Lively S. Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In: Nusbaum H, Goodman J, editors. Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Recognizing Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. MIT; Cambridge. MA: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
- Samuel A. The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Percept Psychophys. 1977;22:321–330. [Google Scholar]
- Shiffrin R. Attention. In: Atkinson R, Herrnstein R, Lindzey G, Luce R, editors. Steven’s Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 2. Vol. 2. Wiley; New York: 1988. pp. 739–811. Learning and Cognition. [Google Scholar]
- Strange W. Speech input and the development of speech perception. In: Kavanagh J, editor. Otitis Media and Child Development. York; Parkton, MD: 1986. pp. 12–26. [Google Scholar]
- Terbeek D. UCLA Work Pap Phon. Vol. 37. UCLA; Los Angeles: 1977. A. cross-language multidimensional scaling study of vowel perception. [Google Scholar]
- Webster’s Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. Library Reproduction Service; Los Angeles: 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Werker J. Becoming a native listener. Am Sci. 1989;77:54–59. [Google Scholar]
- Werker J. The ontogeny of speech perception. In: Mattingly I, Studdert-Kennedy M, editors. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1990. (in press) [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005 · Cited by 905
Norris, D. G. (2003) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00006-9 · Cited by 883
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.418276 · Cited by 858
Self-citationLively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408177 · Cited by 788
Self-citationA new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts.
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.421 · Cited by 771
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. W. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1332378 · Cited by 680
A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00198-1 · Cited by 693
Talker-specific learning in speech perception
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206860 · Cited by 590
Self-citationThe interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1603234 · Cited by 558
Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.428217 · Cited by 521
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206911 · Cited by 467
Self-citationHearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception
Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2007) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.014 · Cited by 483
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.410149 · Cited by 378
Self-citationSaito, K., & Lyster, R. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x · Cited by 434
Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1531176 · Cited by 368
The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing
Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206487 · Cited by 367
Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412280 · Cited by 352
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.428657 · Cited by 348
Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish
Emmanuel Dupoux, A., Sebastián‐Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Sharon Peperkamp, A. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 · Cited by 345
(2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 339
Central Auditory System Plasticity Associated with Speech Discrimination Training
Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T. D., King, C. D., Tremblay, K. L., & Nicol, T. G. (1995) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.25 · Cited by 319
Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour
Brainard, M. S., & Doupe, A. J. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35036205 · Cited by 314
Goldstone, R. L., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2009) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.26 · Cited by 309
Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems
Rauschecker, J. P. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01303-4 · Cited by 309
Perceptual learning for speech
Samuel, A. G., & Tanya Kraljic, A. (2009) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.6.1207 · Cited by 307
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review
Lecumberri, M. L. G., Cooke, M. P., & Cutler, A. (2010) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.014 · Cited by 328
Central auditory system plasticity: Generalization to novel stimuli following listening training
Tremblay, K. L., Kraus, N., Carrell, T. D., & McGee, T. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.420139 · Cited by 302
Plasticity in the Adult Human Auditory Brainstem following Short-term Linguistic Training
Song, J. H., Skoe, E., Wong, P. C. M., & Kraus, N. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20131 · Cited by 295
Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning
Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nelken, I., & Hochstein, S. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0253 · Cited by 298
Brain Structure Predicts the Learning of Foreign Speech Sounds
Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., Bihan, D. L., & Pallier, C. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk001 · Cited by 303
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3593366 · Cited by 285
Port, R. F., & Leary, A. P. (2005) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0195 · Cited by 284
Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping.
Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1005 · Cited by 280
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309030460020801 · Cited by 497
Iverson, P., Hazan, V. L., & Bannister, K. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2062307 · Cited by 277
Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?
Rohde, D. L. T., & Plaut, D. C. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00031-1 · Cited by 275
Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings
Hardison, D. M. (2004) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25228 · Cited by 263
Training English and Chinese Listeners to Perceive Thai Tones: A Preliminary Report
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x · Cited by 262
The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans
Ventureyra, V. A. G., Pallier, C., & Yoo, H. (2003) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/s0911-6044(03)00053-8 · Cited by 259
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830909357156 · Cited by 259
Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.349 · Cited by 247
Speech perception as categorization
Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.5.1218 · Cited by 266
A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver
Hardcastle, W. J., & Beck, J. M. (2014) · Cited by 231
The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training
Neri, A., Catia Cucchiarini, A., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1076/call.15.5.441.13473 · Cited by 232
Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3101452 · Cited by 227
Japanese Adults can Learn to Produce English /I/ and /l/ Accurately
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099503800102 · Cited by 225
The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology
Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C., & Huffman, M. K. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199575039.001.0001 · Cited by 226
How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes
Port, R. F. (2007) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.001 · Cited by 218
Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning
Chandrasekaran, B., Sampath, P. D., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3445785 · Cited by 216
fMRI Evidence for Cortical Modification during Learning of Mandarin Lexical Tone
Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., Jongman, A., & Hirsch, J. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903770007407 · Cited by 223
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3148196 · Cited by 214
Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts
Wang, X., & Munro, M. J. (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.09.011 · Cited by 203
Performance Feedback Drives Caudate Activation in a Phonological Learning Task
Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., McCandliss, B. D., McClelland, J. L., & Fiez, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1029 · Cited by 203
Phonological Grammar Shapes the Auditory Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Jacquemot, C., Pallier, C., Bihan, D. L., Dehaene, S., & Emmanuel Dupoux, A. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-29-09541.2003 · Cited by 197
Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training
Thomson, R. I. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765 · Cited by 196
When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone
Yeung, H. H., Chen, K. H., & Werker, J. F. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.09.004 · Cited by 193
Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals
Sebastián‐Gallés, N., & Soto‐Faraco, S. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00024-4 · Cited by 191
EFFECTS OF ACOUSTIC VARIABILITY ON SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY LEARNING
Barcroft, J., & Sommers, M. S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050175 · Cited by 191
Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception
Sharon Peperkamp, A., & Emmanuel Dupoux, A. (2003) · Cited by 185
Speech perception as an active cognitive process
Heald, S. L. M., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00035 · Cited by 206
Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M., Kubo, R., Masaki, S., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00020-x · Cited by 190
A Statistical Basis for Speech Sound Discrimination
Anderson, J. L., Morgan, J. L., & White, K. S. (2003) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309030460020601 · Cited by 180
Phoneme inventory size and population size
Hay, J., & Bauer, L. (2007) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2007.0071 · Cited by 182
A cross-language comparison of /d /–/ð / perception: Evidence for a new developmental pattern
Polka, L., Colantonio, C., & Sundara, M. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1362689 · Cited by 181
Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure.
Repp, B. H. (1993) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099303600106 · Cited by 182
Pisoni, D. B. (1993) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(93)90063-q · Cited by 178
Self-citationDivergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., LaFleur, R., & Silver-Isenstadt, J. L. (1995) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90022-5 · Cited by 183
Effects of Talker Variability on Perceptual Learning of Dialects
Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309040470030101 · Cited by 175
Self-citationHigh Variability [Pronunciation] Training (HVPT)
Thomson, R. I. (2018) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.17038.tho · Cited by 167
Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access
Creel, S. C., Aslin, R. Ν., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.013 · Cited by 175
MCCANDLISS, B. D., FIEZ, J. A., PROTOPAPAS, A., CONWAY, M., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2002) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.2.2.89 · Cited by 303
Hazan, V. L., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.04.007 · Cited by 193
Yamada, R. A., & Tohkura, Y. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206698 · Cited by 161
Kohl, P. K. (1993) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31326-9 · Cited by 164
Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues
Francis, A. L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2000) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212164 · Cited by 160
Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity
Rossini, P. M., & Forno, G. D. (2004) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s1047-9651(03)00124-4 · Cited by 160
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. A. (1996) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.414884 · Cited by 152
Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation
Sharon Peperkamp, A., Vendelin, I., & Emmanuel Dupoux, A. (2010) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001 · Cited by 151
Time windows in cognitive development.
Rovee‐Collier, C. (1995) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.147 · Cited by 149
Lambacher, S. G., Martens, W. L., Kakehi, K., Marasinghe, C. A., & Molholt, G. (2005) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716405050150 · Cited by 146
Improving L2 Listeners’ Perception of English Vowels: A Computer‐Mediated Approach
Thomson, R. I. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00724.x · Cited by 145
Listeners beware: Speech production may be bad for learning speech sounds
Baese‐Berk, M. M., & Samuel, A. G. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.008 · Cited by 143
Speech Perception Training Can Facilitate Sound Production Learning
Rvachew, S. (1994) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3702.347 · Cited by 141
On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation
Kartushina, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246 · Cited by 140
Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training (CAPT): Current Issues and Future Directions
Rogerson‐Revell, P. (2021) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220977406 · Cited by 136
On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese
Sharon Peperkamp, A., Vendelin, I., & Nakamura, K. (2008) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675708001425 · Cited by 136
Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: a magnetoencephalography study
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Iverson, P., Pruitt, J., Stevens, E. B., Kawakatsu, M., Tohkura, Y., & Nemoto, I. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.028 · Cited by 132
Specialization along the left superior temporal sulcus for auditory categorization
Liebenthal, E., Desai, R., Ellingson, M. M., Ramachandran, B., Desai, A., & Binder, J. R. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq045 · Cited by 134
THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTED L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION
Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000194 · Cited by 133
Liss, J., Spitzer, S. M., Caviness, J. N., & Adler, C. H. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1515793 · Cited by 132
REEXAMINING EFFECTS OF FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION ON L2 PRONUNCIATION DEVELOPMENT
Saito, K. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000666 · Cited by 156
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21272 · Cited by 130
Rvachew, S., Nowak, M., & Cloutier, G. (2004) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/026 · Cited by 127
Anatomical Correlates of Foreign Speech Sound Production
Golestani, N., & Pallier, C. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl003 · Cited by 130
Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.2006.010 · Cited by 123
Samuel, A. G. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131643 · Cited by 130
Lim, S.-J., & Holt, L. L. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x · Cited by 124
Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization
Arlinger, S. D., Gatehouse, S., Bentler, R. A., Byrne, D. M., Cox, R. M., Dirks, D. D., Humes, L. E., Neuman, A. C., Ponton, C. W., Robinson, K., et al. (1996) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199617031-00009 · Cited by 117
Training Japanese Listeners to Perceive American English Vowels: Influence of Training Sets
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/103 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- ORCID
- Pisoni, David B.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 874-886
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- PMC
- PMC3518834
- OpenAlex
- W2037249514
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC-000111, DC-00111-13, F32DC000111, K08DC000111)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- Japanese listeners, stimulus variability, non-native speech perception, English as a second language
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Asian, Attention, Generalization, Stimulus, Humans, Indiana, Japan, Language, Phonetics, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review