Cited by 913Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report

Open access

Logan, John S., Lively, Scott E., Pisoni, David B.·1991·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Native speakers of Japanese learning English generally have difficulty differentiating the phonemes /r/ and /l/, even after years of experience with English. Previous research that attempted to train Japanese listeners to distinguish this contrast using synthetic stimuli reported little success, especially when transfer to natural tokens containing /r/ and /l/ was tested. In the present study, a different training procedure that emphasized variability among stimulus tokens was used. Japanese subjects were trained in a minimal pair identification paradigm using multiple natural exemplars contrasting /r/ and /l/ from a variety of phonetic environments as stimuli. A pretest-posttest design containing natural tokens was used to assess the effects of training. Results from six subjects showed that the new procedure was more robust than earlier training techniques. Small but reliable differences in performance were obtained between pretest and posttest scores. The results demonstrate the importance of stimulus variability and task-related factors in training nonnative speakers to perceive novel phonetic contrasts that are not distinctive in their native language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.1894649

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,207
On the genesis of abstract ideas.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025953 · Cited by 1,983
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044417 · Cited by 1,692
An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R., & Fujimura, O. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211209 · Cited by 689
Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.345 · Cited by 672
Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”
Goto, H. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3 · Cited by 620
Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels
Pisoni, D. B. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214136 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
Developmental Aspects of Cross-Language Speech Perception
Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129249 · Cited by 553 · cited 3×
“Nonlinguistic dimensions include within-talker variability [e.g., multiple natural exemplars from the same talker (Werker et al., 1981)] and between-talker variability [e.g., synthetic stimuli modeled after adult male, adult female, and children’s voices (Kuhl, 1983)].”
BackgroundMethod
Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition
Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.397688 · Cited by 540
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

Abramson A, Lisker L. Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; Academia, Prague. 1970. pp. 569–573. [Google Scholar]
Aslin R, Pisoni D. Some developmental processes in speech perception. In: Yeni-Komshian G, Kavanagh J, Ferguson C, editors. Child Phonology Perception and Production. Academic; New York: 1980. pp. 67–96. [Google Scholar]
Atkinson R. Ingredients for a theory of instruction. Am Psychol. 1972;27:921–931. [Google Scholar]
Flege J. The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In: Winitz H, editor. Human Communication and Its Disorders, A Review. Ablex; Norwood, NJ: 1988. pp. 224–401. [Google Scholar]
Gillette S. Minn Papers Ling Philos Lang. Vol. 6. University of Minnesota; Minneapolis: 1980. Contextual variation in the perception of L and R by Japanese and Korean speakers; pp. 59–72. [Google Scholar]
Jusczyk P. Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. Paper presented at International Conference on Phonological Development; Stanford University. 1989. [Google Scholar]
Kuhl P. Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Inf Behav Dev. 1983;6:263–285. [Google Scholar]
Lehiste I. Acoustic characteristics of selected English consonants. Int J Am Ling. 1964;30:10–115. [Google Scholar]
Lively S, Logan J, Pisoni D. Res Speech Percept, Prog Rep No 16. Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University; Bloomington: 1990. An acoustic analyses of /r/ and /l/ across phonetic environments and talkers. [Google Scholar]
Lively S, Pisoni D, Logan J. Some effects of training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ In: Tohkura Yohichi., editor. Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic structure. OHM; Tokyo: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
Mochizuki M. The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. J Phon. 1981;9:283–303. [Google Scholar]
Pisoni D, Logan J, Lively S. Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. In: Nusbaum H, Goodman J, editors. Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Recognizing Speech Sounds to Spoken Words. MIT; Cambridge. MA: 1991. (to be published) [Google Scholar]
Samuel A. The effect of discrimination training on speech perception: Noncategorical perception. Percept Psychophys. 1977;22:321–330. [Google Scholar]
Shiffrin R. Attention. In: Atkinson R, Herrnstein R, Lindzey G, Luce R, editors. Steven’s Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 2. Vol. 2. Wiley; New York: 1988. pp. 739–811. Learning and Cognition. [Google Scholar]
Strange W. Speech input and the development of speech perception. In: Kavanagh J, editor. Otitis Media and Child Development. York; Parkton, MD: 1986. pp. 12–26. [Google Scholar]
Terbeek D. UCLA Work Pap Phon. Vol. 37. UCLA; Los Angeles: 1977. A. cross-language multidimensional scaling study of vowel perception. [Google Scholar]
Webster’s Seventh Collegiate Dictionary. Library Reproduction Service; Los Angeles: 1967. [Google Scholar]
Werker J. Becoming a native listener. Am Sci. 1989;77:54–59. [Google Scholar]
Werker J. The ontogeny of speech perception. In: Mattingly I, Studdert-Kennedy M, editors. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1990. (in press) [Google Scholar]

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 912

Egyptian learners’ learnability of Korean phonemes*
Benjamin, S., Lee, H.-Y., & Hwange, H. (2019) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2019.11.4.019
Development of Perceptual Training Software for Realizing High Variability Training Paradigm and Self Adaptive Training Paradigm
Yang, R., Nanjo, H., & Dantsuji, M. (2018) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
英語を学習する日本語母語話者による英語の/r/・/l/の知覚
悠, 朝. (2018) · doi:10.24781/letkj.2.0_1
Effects of Web-based Auditory Training on the Perception of Korean Sounds by Mandarin Learners of Korean
Ryu, N.-Y. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Individual Differences in Lexical Tone Learning
Ingvalson, E. M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2020) · Chinese language learning sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7606-5_4
The Use of Feedback in Training American Listeners to Perceive Cantonese Tones
Yan, K. T. (2008)
The role of indexical cues in the distributional learning of phonetic categories.Preprint
Kam, C. L. H. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zksaf
Reinforced statistical learning of auditory categoriesPreprint
McMurray, B., & Chiu, S. L. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rzbfu
A study of dominance in speech perception and production by German-English bilinguals
Holmes, F. (1995) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
Chinese Tones: Can You Listen With Your Eyes?: The Influence of Visual Information on Auditory Perception of Chinese Tones
Han, Y. (2021) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
Perception Point: Identifying Critical Learning Periods in Speech for Bilingual NetworksPreprint
Saraswat, A., Bhatia, M., Singla, Y. K., Chen, C., & Shah, R. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06507
References
(2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444395068.refs
Reliability of Web-based French Phoneme Perception Test
Kim, S., Ryu, N.-Y., & Won, Y. (2021) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2021.22.12.2099
Learning acoustic cue weights for Korean stops through L2 perception training
Oh, E. (2021) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2021.13.4.009
References
Yavas, M. S. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781444392623.refs
Learning and Using Written Word Forms
Rebecca Treiman, A., & Kessler, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.24
Learning words amidst speech sound variability
Creel, S. C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.7
The Dynamics of Word Production
Kilbourn-Ceron, O., & Goldrick, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.25
How Learners Move From Sound To Morphology
Demuth, K. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.8
Early Logic and Language
Crain, S. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.11
Syntax and The Lexicon
Αλεξιάδου, Ά. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.2
Easy words
Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.30
Introduction
Anna Papafragou, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.29
Logic and The Lexicon
Hacquard, V. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.4
Compositionality of concepts
Stojnić, G., & Lepore, E. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.20
Peer Review #2 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.2)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.2/reviews/2
Peer Review #1 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.1)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.1/reviews/1
Peer Review #3 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.1)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.1/reviews/3
Peer Review #1 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.2)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.2/reviews/1
Peer Review #3 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.2)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.2/reviews/3
Peer Review #2 of "The effects of high versus low talker variability and individual aptitude on phonetic training of Mandarin lexical tones (v0.1)"
(2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7287/peerj.7191v0.1/reviews/2
Jose A. Mompean & Jonás Fouz-González (eds.). (2015) Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions
Ergül, H. (2017) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.3.1.08erg
Introduction
Mompeán, J. A. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137509437_1
Input variability and learner age in L2 vocabulary learning (submitted 2018)Preprint
Sinkeviciute, R., Brown, H., Brekelmans, G., & Wonnacott, E. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4edgu
The nature of phonological representations in a second language
Cruz, E. L. (2015) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.20389083
Auditory category learning is robust across training regimesPreprint
Obasih, C. O., Luthra, S., Dick, F., & Holt, L. L. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ygwhd
Exploring open consonantal environments for at-home testing of vowel perception in advanced L2 speakers
Jones, J. (2022) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2021-0201
Perception of Korean Plosives by L2 Learners of Korean
Kim, C.-W. (2007)
Does Talker Variability Help Adults Learn Novel Words?Preprint
Adas, S. A. E., Yen, I., & Levi, S. V. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yrwxh
An analysis of English as a foreign language learners’ perceptual confusions and phonemic awareness of English fricatives
Lee, K. (2023) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2023.15.3.037
Kan man måle opfattelsen af andetsprogets lyde?
Horslund, C. S., & Villumsen, J. (2023) · NyS Nydanske Sprogstudier · doi:10.7146/nys.v1i64.141692
Effects of Phonetic Training with Noise on EFL Learners' English Vowel Reception Thresholds
Qin, Y., & Gong, J. C. (2023) · International Conference on Asian Language Processing · doi:10.1109/ialp61005.2023.10337190
Dedication
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.002.0088
List of Abbreviations
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.002.0006
Copyright Page
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.002.0004
Perceptual training on Korean obstruents for Vietnamese learners*
Hwang, H. (2023) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2023.15.4.017
The Laboratory, the Classroom, and Online
Martin, I. A., & Inceoglu, S. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781394259663.ch13
A principled approach to teaching German lexical stress assignment
Maczuga, P., Knaus, J., & O’Brien, M. G. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.23048.mac
High Variability Orthographic Training: Learning words in a logographic script through training with multiple typefacesPreprint
Pelzl, E. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bhfxv
Statistical Analysis of Tonal Acquisition in Disyllabic Words among Polish Learners of Mandarin: A Comparative Study
Chu, M.-N., Chang, C., & Lin, H.-W. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14146095
Are Chinese University Students Ready for Autonomous English Listening Practice?
Luu, T. M. V., & Lu, J. (2024) · Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal · doi:10.37237/202403
The interacting effects of talker, contrast, and listener variability in cross-language speech perception
Hayes‐Harb, R., & Barrios, S. L. (2024) · JASA Express Letters · doi:10.1121/10.0028277
Teaching and researching French nasal vowels: The pros and cons of online training modalities for improving perception and production
Becker, S. R. (2024) · Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (PSLLT) · doi:10.31274/psllt.17296
Implementation of Electropalatography and Evaluation of the Rhotic “r” Sound
Woo, S.-T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3492798
De la comprensión auditiva a la pronunciación
Aguiar, V. M. (2024) · IVITRA research in linguistics and literature · doi:10.1075/ivitra.42.05mar
Supplemental Material for Bayes Factors for Logistic (Mixed-Effect) Models
(2024) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000714.supp
English Education Method Influence Mechanism Analysis
Xu, X., & Guihen, L. (2024) · Journal of Education Teaching and Social Studies · doi:10.22158/jetss.v6n4p178
Exploring the Impact of Technology on Perceptual Teaching of Greek Pronunciation: Comprehensive Review of CAPT Methods
Elsafoury, Y. Y. (2025) · Bulletin of The Faculty of Languages & Translation · doi:10.21608/bflt.2025.421756
Actively seeking variability: effects of active learning and talker variability on novel word learning in adultsPreprint
Bulgarelli, F., & Rabideau, M. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fcmx4_v1
Actively seeking variability: effects of active learning and talker variability on novel word learning in adultsPreprint
Bulgarelli, F., & Rabideau, M. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/fcmx4_v2
Memory-card English vowel training for second-language learners: Effects of age and bilingualism for Spanish-Catalan-speaking children
Herrero, B. P., & Iverson, P. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0036885
Chapter 1. Introduction
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.01ch1
Table of contents
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.toc
Acknowledgments
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.ack
Prelim pages
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.prelim
Appendix A
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.app1
Index
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.index
References
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.refs
Appendix B
(2015) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43.app2
The impact of segmental familiarity on incidental suprasegmental category learning
Wright, J. M., & Baese‐Berk, M. M. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0037075
Intelligibility and input variability influence adaptation to unfamiliar L2 pronunciation in L2
Nishizawa, H. (2025) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.70013
The effect of oral repetition during discrimination training on L2 perceptual learning
Ueda, R. (2025) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.24014.ued
Phonological Databases
Goh, W. D., & Qian, Z. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00995-9
To What Extent Is Spoken English Proficiency of Chinese University Student Relate to the Auditory Vocabulary Acquired through Watching English Program?
Liao, H., & Li, G. (2025) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2025.155046
The role of speaking rates in High Variability Phonetic Training*
Lee, J., & Park, H. (2025) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2025.17.3.041
Towards a cognitive architecture to enable natural language interaction in co-constructive task learning
Scheibl, M., Richter, B., Müller, A., Beetz, M., & Wrede, B. (2025) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man63969.2025.11217812
L1 Phoneme Distributional Features Influence L2 Perception: A Comparison Between Audiovisual and Auditory Input Using HVPTPreprint
Cavicchio, F., & Grimaldi, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5723038
Creating New Language Materials for an Online Pronunciation Training Platform
Koreman, J. (2025) · Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech · doi:10.3138/jmbs-2024-0013
Processing Second/Foreign‐Language Prosody
Tremblay, A. (2025) · doi:10.1002/9781394312375.ch09
High‐Variability Phonetic Training
Thomson, R. I. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal20656
Explicit Pronunciation Training using Automatic Speech Recognition Technology
Dalby, J. M., & Kewley-Port, D. (2000) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-500-420251023
References
(2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-772-520251009
Phonetic Training and Talker Variability in the Perception of Spanish Stop Consonants
Rascón, I. A. (2025) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages11010001
Enhancing pronunciation training with artificial intelligence
Hayter, E. L. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.26016.hay
Ubiratã Kickhöfel Alves and Jeniffer Imaregna Alcantara de Albuquerque (eds.). 2023. Second language pronunciation: different approaches to teaching and training (Studies on Language Acquisition 64)
Lin, D., Zhang, W., & Wang, F. (2026) · Phonetica · doi:10.1515/phon-2025-0084
A meta-analytic review of Mandarin tone perception: tone height and tone contour, prosodic background, and L2 experience
Cui, X., & Zhao, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1670858
PROBLEMS OF ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION CORRECTION IN THE FIRST YEAR OF STUDY AT A LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY
Нестеренко, Н., & Лисенко, К. (2026) · PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS · doi:10.17721/2663-6530.2026.49.131-142
Apprentissage des langues secondes : les processus de perception et de production de la parole : Perspectives phonétique et psycholinguistique
Peri, P. (2013) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a147f05az5944z49d0z8192z3fdfec73ec6f
L’acquisition du voisement des occlusives du français par des sinophones : locuteurs wu et non-wu
Wang, N. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/eb824df4z72dez4391z8da4z5dd5d0de21e8
Decoding perceptual vowel epenthesis : experiments & modelling
Guevara‐Rukoz, A. (2018) · doi:10.70675/db040a22z39d7z467cza75bz544d4eb7074c
Issues in L2 phonological processing
Melnik-Leroy, G. A. (2019) · doi:10.70675/9a937142zf04cz4b8ezb9eez721a2a6b9628 · Cited by 3
Perception et production des voyelles orales françaises par des enfants tunisiens néo-apprenants du français
Ammar, Z. (2018) · doi:10.70675/42b9e595zb234z4562z8ac9z05a28619a88c
Language and color perception : the case of the Italian and French blue semantics : a contrastive analysis of linguistic categorizations and cognitive functions in monolingual and bilingual speakers
Simoncelli, C. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4ec327fbz873ez48c1z9dc9z3faada1a9694
Investigating the effect of high-variability phonetic training under various acoustic environments on vowel length identification for L2 listenersPreprint
Wang, X. E., Zheng, Y., Hioka, Y., & Hui, C. T. J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6588329
Actively seeking variability: effects of active learning and talker variability on novel word learning in adultsPreprint
Rabideau, M., & Bulgarelli, F. (2026) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Training based on visual search is effective for non-native phonemic contrastsPreprint
Foxton, J. M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7002139
Perceptual training selectively strengthens top-down signaling to sensory cortexPreprint
Macêdo-Lima, M., McCollum, M., & Caras, M. L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.25.734556
Game‐Based Foreign‐Language Speech Rehearsal Improves Pitch Processing Beyond Speech Domain
Ylinen, S., Junttila, K., Smolander, A.-R. M., Karhila, R., & Kurimo, M. (2026) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70603
English vowel perception hierarchy of Korean learners: Effects of Residential Context*
Shin, D.-J. (2026) · Phonetics and Speech Sciences · doi:10.13064/ksss.2026.18.2.001
The double phonemic boundary effect in L3 acquisition
Parrish, K. (2026) · Journal of Second Language Studies · doi:10.1075/jsls.00064.par

Authors: Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
Affiliations: Indiana University Bloomington (US)
ORCID: Pisoni, David B.
Venue: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher: Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published: 1991-02-01
Volume: 89
Issue: 2
Pages: 874-886
ISSN: 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
1520-8524
DOI: 10.1121/1.1894649
PMC: PMC3518834
OpenAlex: W2037249514
Cited by: 913
References: 25
Citations by year: 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
FWCI: 9.69
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders: National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000111-38)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC-000111, DC-00111-13, F32DC000111, K08DC000111)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords: Japanese listeners, stimulus variability, non-native speech perception, English as a second language
MeSH terms: Adult, Asian, Attention, Generalization, Stimulus, Humans, Indiana, Japan, Language, Phonetics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks