Cited by 550Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityCritical Race Theory in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes

Open access

Abstract

Racial achievement gaps are twice as large, and all students are less motivated, when STEM faculty believe ability is fixed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

12 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. C. S. Dweck Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation Personality and Development (Psychology Press 1999).
  2. D. M. Bates Lme4: Mixed-Effects Modeling With R (Springer 2010).
  3. D. M. Steele B. Cohn-Vargas Identity Safe Classrooms: Places to Belong and Learn (Corwin Press ed. 1 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 460

Metadata

Authors
Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Canning, Elizabeth A.
  • Murphy, Mary C.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2019-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
eaau4734-eaau4734
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913734454
Cited by
550
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 27
FWCI
72.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DRL-1450755, HRD-1661004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
fixed mindset, growth mindset, faculty beliefs, racial achievement gap, underrepresented minority students, student motivation, STEM education, course evaluation, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review