The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes
Open accessAbstract
Racial achievement gaps are twice as large, and all students are less motivated, when STEM faculty believe ability is fixed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“we caution that change will be most beneficial if faculty and administrators believe that underrepresented students are capable of being successful (44) and make a strong commitment to quality in teaching.”
From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“larger gaps are correlated with faculty who have a fixed mindset, which interprets intelligence as innate and immutable and is therefore exclusion or selection-oriented (44).”
From Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · Cited by 24,346
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773 · cited 2×
“A multilevel regression model accounted for the nested nature of the data (students nested within courses, nested within faculty) and controlled for confounding factors such as students’ previous achievement (SAT scores) and all available course and faculty characteristics (17).”
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · Cited by 3,435
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805 · Cited by 2,334
Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development
Brookover, W., Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092211 · Cited by 2,200 · cited 1×
“Classic findings regarding the influence of teacher beliefs on students’ performance demonstrate that when teachers have lower expectations for their students, those students become less motivated and perform more poorly in those teachers’ classes (10).”
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines
Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261375 · Cited by 1,516
Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation.
Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029531 · Cited by 1,367
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- C. S. Dweck Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation Personality and Development (Psychology Press 1999).
- D. M. Bates Lme4: Mixed-Effects Modeling With R (Springer 2010).
- D. M. Steele B. Cohn-Vargas Identity Safe Classrooms: Places to Belong and Learn (Corwin Press ed. 1 2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 460
Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions
Hensley, L. C., Kulesza, A. E., Peri, J., Brady, A. C., Wolters, C. A., Sovic, D. M., & Breitenberger, C. A. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-03-0068 · Cited by 24
“Consistent with other recent research in STEM contexts (e.g., Canning et al., 2019), students identifying as White or Asian students were considered majority status.”
ResultSung, G., Guillain, L. V., & Schneider, B. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00455-5 · Cited by 27
“…in STEM are known to be disproportionately harmful for learners experiencing additional stereotype-based threats to belonging and self-efficacy, such as for women and racial minorities (Canning et al., 2019; Castellanos, 2018; Koch et al., 2008; Rypisi et al., 2009; Steffens & Jelenec, 2011).”
Importance of centering traditional knowledge and Indigenous culture in geoscience education
Todd, W. F., Towne, C. E., & Clarke, J. B. (2023) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2023.2172976 · Cited by 26
“A 2019 longitudinal survey sampled 150 STEM professors and revealed racial achievement gaps in courses taught by biased faculty were twice as large as the achievement gaps in courses taught by unbiased faculty (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCorwin, L. A., Kiser, S. L., LoRe, S., Miller, J., & Aikens, M. L. (2019) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-01-0003 · Cited by 21
Kroeper, K. M., Gopalan, M., Emerson, K. T. U., & Walton, G. M. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10010-w · Cited by 27
“One longitudinal field study found that even as all students performed worse in STEM classes taught by professors who endorsed a fixed (rather than growth) mindset, this harm was greatest for racially minoritized students (Canning et al., 2019).”
A bioecological perspective on mindset
Kim, M. H. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102173 · Cited by 21
Stofer, K., Chandler, J., Insalaco, S., Matyas, C., Lannon, H. J. L., Judge, J., Lanman, B., Hom, B., & Norton, H. (2021) · Community College Review · doi:10.1177/00915521211026682 · Cited by 20
“Finally, the faculty mentor’s own training, mindset, and biases play an important role beyond the scope of discussion here (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBuilding high performing teams: Opportunities and challenges of inclusive recruitment practices.
Coleman, D., Dossett, L. A., & Dimick, J. (2021) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.054 · Cited by 20
Fostering Equitable Outcomes in Introductory Biology Courses through Use of a Dual Domain Pedagogy
Bauer, A. C., Coffield, V. M., Crater, D., Lyda, T., Segarra, V. A., Suh, K., Vigueira, C., & Vigueira, P. (2020) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-07-0134 · Cited by 20
“Likewise, Canning et al. (2019) recently demonstrated that, when courses are taught by faculty who have fixed mindset beliefs, racial achievement gaps are twice as large as those observed in courses taught by growth mindset faculty.”
BackgroundA multi-informant study on teachers' mindset, classroom practices, and student well-being
Wang, M., Scanlon, C. L., McKellar, S. E., & Ye, F. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101875 · Cited by 24
The rich get richer: Socioeconomic advantage amplifies the role of growth mindsets in learning
King, R. B., & Wang, F. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12755 · Cited by 21
“Previous studies have supported the validity of the mindset- by-context framework (Bernardo et al., 2021; Canning et al., 2019; Lou & Li, 2023).”
Sun, X., Norton, O., & Nancekivell, S. E. (2023) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-023-00190-x · Cited by 19
“Educators ’ beliefs about whether intelligence is fi xed at birth are related to their students ’ achievement, especially among stigmatized groups 41 .”
Toding, M., Mädamürk, K., Venesaar, U., & Malleus, E. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100769 · Cited by 27
Lin, S., & Muenks, K. M. (2023) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2023.2177163 · Cited by 22
“…(e.g., having only one midterm and one final exam that give students few opportunities to demonstrate their learning; Kroeper et al., 2022), leading them to experience lower motivation and performance (Canning et al., 2019; LaCosse et al., 2021; Muenks et al., 2020, 2021; Rattan et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKu, Y.-R., & Stager, C. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.572220 · Cited by 27
“Various instructional platforms ultimately led to a new teaching model that combined online teaching and autonomous learning (Canning et al., 2019; Sharma and Bhaskar, 2020).”
BackgroundShould I Start at MATH 101? Content Repetition as an Academic Strategy in Elective Curriculums
Harrison, M. H., Hernandez, P. A., & Stevens, M. L. (2022) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/00380407221076490 · Cited by 22
“2015) and had larger racial achievement gaps (Canning et al. 2019).”
BackgroundA Sociocultural Learning Framework for Inclusive Pedagogy in Engineering
Farrell, S. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Education · doi:10.18260/2-1-370.660-128660 · Cited by 31
The growth mindset for changing medical education culture
Theard, M., Marr, M., & Harrison, R. (2021) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100972 · Cited by 19
“Student evaluations in classes taught by fixed mindset faculty indicated a negative educational climate [9].”
BackgroundNursing Students' Mindsets Matter
Williams, C. A. (2020) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000798 · Cited by 29
The Effect of Social Belonging on Persistence to General Chemistry 2
Edwards, J. D., Torres, H. L., & Frey, R. F. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01048 · Cited by 23
Casey, J. R., Supriya, K., Shaked, S., Caram, J. R., Russell, A. A., & Courey, A. J. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01253 · Cited by 26
Teacher Beliefs and Student Learning
Wolf, S., & Brown, A. (2023) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000529450 · Cited by 38
“Teachers with fixed mindsets demotivated students based on an analysis of their course evaluations (Canning et al., 2019), showing that teachers’ fixed mindsets can demotivate students and lead to more negative classroom experiences.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFink, A., Mattson, P. S., Cahill, M. J., Frey, R. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (2022) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283211053806 · Cited by 24
“Indeed, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that students are sensitive to instructor mindsets about student abilities, with consequences for their motivation, engagement, and achievement (e.g., Canning et al., 2019; Muenks et al., 2020).”
Kennedy, S. A., Balija, A. M., Bibeau, C., Fuhrer, T. J., Huston, L. A., Jackson, M. S., Lane, K. T., Lau, J. K., Liss, S., Monceaux, C. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00414 · Cited by 21
Nallapothula, D., Lozano, J. B., Han, S., Herrera, C. A. N., Sayson, H. W., Levis‐Fitzgerald, M., & Maloy, J. P. (2020) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.1987 · Cited by 28
“Additionally, an important barrier to implementation of interventions focused on students’ implicit assumptions is the fact that instructors themselves exhibit significant variability in their implicit assumptions about students’ abilities, and this variability is associated with differential student outcomes (45).”
BackgroundGrowth mindsets in academics and academia: a review of influence and interventions
Sousa, B. J., & Clark, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2024.2384003 · Cited by 17
“Academics’ mindset could also widen inequities – as a fixed mindset in academics was more strongly associated with lower course performance among Black, Latino, and Indigenous students than among White and Asian students (Canning et al., 2019).”
InfluentialFlanagan-Bórquez, A., & Soriano-Soriano, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1416191 · Cited by 17
Framework for unpacking students’ mindsets in physics by gender
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes‐Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2022) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.18.010116 · Cited by 35
“, whether they have growth or fixed mindset about their students’ potential) can impact students’ performance especially for underrepresented student groups [75].”
BackgroundQin, X., Wormington, S. V., Guzman-Alvarez, A., & Wang, M. (2021) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2021.1894520 · Cited by 26
“Additional research could assess other contextual factors that may enhance or dampen intervention effects, such as assessing instructor and administrators’ growth mindset beliefs and behaviors (e.g., Canning et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020).”
BackgroundTowards meaningful diversity, equity and inclusion in physics learning environments
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02391-6 · Cited by 14
“…study at a large research university in the United States that involved 150 STEM instructors from 13 different science disciplines including physics 110 found that instructors who had a fixed mindset regarding their students’ abilities had achievement gaps in their courses between white and ERM…”
Park, E. S., Wilton, M., Lo, S. M., Buswell, N. T., Suarez, N. A., & Sato, B. K. (2024) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-023-09769-0 · Cited by 15
“In contrast, ignoring diversity or “not seeing color” in the classroom may lead to chilly classroom climates (Canning et al., 2019; Suárez-Orozco et al., 2015).”
InfluentialDerricks, V. S., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2021) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843211005447 · Cited by 31
“These items were also adapted from previous research (Canning et al., 2019).”
Methodvan den Beuken, M., Loos, I., Maas, E. T., Stunt, J. J., & Kuijper, L. D. J. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07289-2 · Cited by 25
“In addition, focus on growth can lead to increased student motivation [34].”
Malespina, A., Seifollahi, F., & Singh, C. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14101092 · Cited by 20
Lee, S. Y., Christiaans, E., & Robinson, K. A. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102282 · Cited by 15
Rozhenkova, V., Snow, L. E., Sato, B. K., Lo, S. M., & Buswell, N. T. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00440-9 · Cited by 25
“…differing beliefs reflect the current work examining instructor growth versus fixed mindsets and the impacts these beliefs can have on student success, particularly for students from minoritized populations (Canning et al., 2019; Fuesting et al., 2019; LaCosse et al., 2021; Muenks et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBig Need Not Be Bad: A Case Study of Experiential Leadership Development in Different-Sized Classes
Page, N. C., Nimon-Peters, A., & Urquhart, A. (2020) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562920948921 · Cited by 15
“…they are aiming to develop in students, this can have a disproportionate negative effect on the motivation and achievement levels of students, particularly those from minorities about which there exists a negative stereotype related to performance in the discipline concerned (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMaries, A., Li, Y., & Singh, C. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad91c4 · Cited by 14
“For example, research investigating achievement gaps in STEM conducted with 150 instructors in 13 different STEM disciplines [181] found that the achievement gaps between PEERs and non-PEERs in the STEM courses taught by instructors who had a fixed mindset about their students’ Review potential…”
Muenks, K. M., & Yan, Y. (2023) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-023-10049-8 · Cited by 18
“Indeed, prior research has found that the effects of actual or perceived professor mindset on students’ psychological, motivational, and performance outcomes are moderated by gender (LaCosse et al., 2021) and race (Canning et al., 2019) in a STEM context.”
Self-citationTeaching the Inevitable: Embracing a Pedagogy of Failure
Jackson, L. E., Finaret, A. B., & Whitenack, L. B. (2023) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.16 · Cited by 21
“Importantly, research suggests that it is not only student beliefs that matter, but that STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) faculty mindsets may have ripple effects on students’ performance and motivation (Canning et al. 2019; Dweck 2014b).”
BackgroundCharacterizing Mindset-Related Challenges in Undergraduate Chemistry Courses
Santos, D. L., & Mooring, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00270 · Cited by 22
von Vacano, C., Ruiz, M., Starowicz, R., Olojo, S., Luna, A. Y. M., Muzzall, E., Mendoza‐Denton, R., & Harding, D. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754233 · Cited by 19
Suherman, S., Setiawan, R., Herdian, H., & Anggoro, B. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education · doi:10.58524/jasme.v1i2.29 · Cited by 14
“Teachers of all skill levels interact more with male students than female students (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundGender Inequities Throughout STEM
Maries, A., Whitcomb, K. M., & Singh, C. (2022) · Journal of College Science Teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2022.12290557 · Cited by 14
“These interventions can be used at the beginning of the term, but the culture of the class must be consonant with the message of the interventions (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInclusive Instructional Practices: Course Design, Implementation, and Discourse
Salehi, S., Ballen, C. J., Trujillo, G., & Wieman, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.602639 · Cited by 18
“Students are in class to learn new skills, not to show off previous skills (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundLimeri, L. B., Musgrove, M. M. C., Henry, M. A., & Schussler, E. E. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0236 · Cited by 18
Green, D. J.-A., Wout, D. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2020) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/cdp0000331 · Cited by 19
Self-citationRiestra, A. M., Morales, A. J., & Mercer, F. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02906 · Cited by 13
“Lack of access to and discrimination in higher education has nurtured unacceptable achievement gaps between under-represented minorities (URM) and non-URMwhite and Asian students across STEM fields, threatening the expertise, breadth, and perspective of future STEM professions, and limiting social mobility for URMs in…”
BackgroundStudent Responses to Problematic STEM Teaching Methods
Harper, R. P., Weston, T. J., & Seymour, E. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_6 · Cited by 18
Do socializers’ mindset beliefs matter for student mindset and achievement? A meta-analysis
Fong, C. J., Muenks, K. M., Fathi, Z., Adelugba, S. F., O'Grady, M., Lin, S., & Goldstein, M. G. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102709 · Cited by 16
Self-citationNúñez, A.-M. (2024) · Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2024.2344531 · Cited by 13
“A growth mind-set has positive consequences for student development, as faculty beliefs that student abilities are malleable, rather than fixed, are associated with increased performance in STEM courses (Canning et al., 2019).”
Asbury, K., Roloff, J., Carstensen, B., Guill, K., & Klusmann, U. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104367 · Cited by 19
Race, academic achievement and the issue of inequitable motivational payoff
Silverman, D. M., Rosario, R. J., Wormington, S. V., Tibbetts, Y., Hulleman, C. S., & Destin, M. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01533-9 · Cited by 17
Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Johnson, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1016415 · Cited by 22
“Instructors’ mindset has been shown to influence pedagogical decisions (Rattan et al., 2012; Aragón et al., 2018; Canning et al., 2019; Ferrare, 2019; Bathgate et al., 2019a; Richardson et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBlatt, L. R., Schunn, C. D., Votruba‐Drzal, E., & Rottman, B. M. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00253-0 · Cited by 19
Barber, C. R., McCollum, J. K., & Maboudian, W. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108766890.009
Lo, S. M., Luu, T. B., & Tran, J. (2020) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1881 · Cited by 15
Concerns and Challenges in Introductory Statistics and Correlates with Motivation and Interest
Sutter, C. C., Givvin, K. B., & Hulleman, C. S. (2023) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2023.2229777 · Cited by 14
“…2015) for a number of reasons, including: the stereotypes about who can be successful favor individuals who are White, Asian, and/or male (e.g., Canning et al., 2019); the lack of diverse representation of students and faculty from different racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds (e.g.,…”
Jackson, M. A., Moon, S., Doherty, J. H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00340-4 · Cited by 18
“Interconnected model of professional growth (Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002) Beliefs about teaching Read Instructor Mindset paper (Canning et al., 2019)”
MethodSTEM approach and computer science impact the metaphorical thinking of Indonesian students’
Farida, F., Supriadi, N., Andriani, S., Pratiwi, D., Suherman, S., & Muhammad, R. R. (2022) · Resource Discovery · doi:10.6018/red.493721 · Cited by 12
“There is an approaching stage by giving new ideas, creativities, and innovations to students in accordance with the students' abilities, due to learning mathematics in class can provide optimal results (Abdurrahman, Nurulsari, et al., 2019; Canning et al., 2019; Morgan et al., 2019; Pradubthong et al., 2018; Trevallio…”
BackgroundInfluentialBelonging in STEM: Growth Mindset as a Filter of Contextual Cues
Williams, C. L., Hirschi, Q., Hulleman, C. S., & Roksa, J. (2021) · International Journal of Community Well-Being · doi:10.1007/s42413-021-00111-z · Cited by 22
“…instructors may communicate to students key information about the school in general, as evidenced by a growing literature that connects instructors’ mindset beliefs to important studentlevel motivation and achievement outcomes (Canning et al., 2019; Muenks et al., 2020; LaCosse et al., 2020).”
BackgroundParental mindsets as determinants of children’s achievement goals and performance in math
Kim, S., Lee, H. J., & Bong, M. (2024) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-024-09953-9 · Cited by 14
“Self-reported and student-perceived teachers’ mindsets have been linked to various psychological and achievement outcomes of students (Canning et al., 2019; LaCosse et al., 2021; Muenks et al., 2020).”
Naibert, N., Mooring, S. R., & Barbera, J. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00929 · Cited by 18
A systematic review of barriers to pursuing careers in medicine among Black premedical students
Rattani, A., Mian, Z. N., Farahani, S., Ridge, M. S., Uzamere, T., & Bajwa, M. (2024) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2023.09.011 · Cited by 11
Fostering a growth mindset in secondary mathematics classrooms in the Netherlands
Hoeve, M. L. K.-V., Doorman, M., & Veldhuis, M. (2023) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2023.2241433 · Cited by 13
“The theory of mindset has the potential to bring a positive change in mathematics education, which could enable teachers to make mathematics less frustrating, while possibly also improving students’ learning outcomes (e.g. Boaler, 2016; Canning et al., 2019).”
Connor, M. C., & Raker, J. R. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00484 · Cited by 12
Muenks, K. M., & Yan, V. X. (2022) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-022-09718-2 · Cited by 13
“Canning et al. (2019) found that university students whose instructors endorsed stronger fixed mindsets about intelligence (i.e., that “some students ‘have it’ and other students don’t”) reported that their instructors were less likely to motivate them to do their best work and less likely to…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationTeachers’ mindsets in medical education: A pilot survey of clinical supervisors
Pal, N. E., Young, M., Danoff, D., Plotnick, L., Cummings, B.-A., Gomez-Garibello, C., & Dory, V. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1679359 · Cited by 11
“Teacher mindsets have been shown to impact their teaching, assessment and feedback strategies, which in turn influence motivation and achievement in students (Butler 2000; Rattan et al. 2012; Canning et al. 2019).”
BackgroundReflecting on their mission increases preservice teachers’ growth mindsets
Heyder, A., Steinmayr, R., & Cimpian, A. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101770 · Cited by 17
The secret language of peers: How peer behaviours signal mindset and influence classroom experiences
Seo, E., Lee, S. Y., Muenks, K. M., & Yan, Y. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12759 · Cited by 13
“These studies indicate that teachers' growth mindsets are associated with improvements in academic achievement, particularly for marginalized students (Canning et al., 2019; Hecht, Bryan, & Yeager, 2023; Hecht, Gosling, et al., 2023).”
Self-citationKattoum, R. N., & Baillie, M. T. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00535-5 · Cited by 14
“By emphasizing the malleability of intelligence and the value of resilience, educators can counteract negative ste-reotypes and instill confidence in students who may face systemic barriers or feel marginalized within STEM disciplines (Canning et al., 2019, 2021).”
Robinson, K. A., & Lee, S. Y. (2023) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2023.2267006 · Cited by 13
“…practices in real-world classrooms may not be discrete, stand-alone behaviors but rather quite interrelated patterns of behavior, perhaps arising from teachers’ underlying beliefs about teaching and learning (Canning et al., 2019; Dicke et al., 2021; Rattan et al., 2012; Stipek et al., 2001).”
A Practical Strategy for Training Graduate CS Teaching Assistants to Provide Effective Feedback
Zaman, A., Cook, A., Phan, V., & Windsor, A. J. (2023) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3587102.3588776 · Cited by 11
“There is growing evidence that the mindset of STEM instructional staff affect student performance, and that this effect is particularly strong for students from under-represented groups [15, 16] The two modules are primarily informational, focusing on research papers.”
Sypré, S., Waterschoot, J., Soenens, B., Verschueren, K., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2023) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-023-00716-2 · Cited by 12
“…and achievement (e.g., Blackwell et al., 2007; Burnette et al., 2013; Costa & Faria, 2018), but only a few studies have begun to demonstrate the role of teachers’ own mindsets in the quality of their teaching styles (Canning et al., 2019; Rattan et al., 2012; Sun, 2015; Vermote et al., 2020).”
Ibrahim, A., Sulaiman, N., & Ali, I. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108666119 · Cited by 10
“Positive attitude and supportive instructors (which active learning can induce as part of its activities) have been shown to induce higher academic achievements from low-performing students and to narrow the performance gap (48, 49).”
BackgroundReimagining the Introductory Math Curriculum for Life Sciences Students
O’Leary, E. S., Sayson, H. W., Shapiro, C. A., Garfinkel, A., Conley, W. J., Levis‐Fitzgerald, M., Eagan, M. K., & Valkenburgh, B. V. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-11-0252 · Cited by 9
“This structure helps with maintaining continuity of classroom culture, one that explicitly emphasizes a growth mindset (Dweck, 1999; Canning et al. , 2019), with instructors consistently messaging that everyone is capable of success (Cohen et al. , 1999).”
Scheuermann, N. L., Idlebird, C., Kukday, S. S., McCracken, V. J., Bradley, R. E., & Bergan‐Roller, H. E. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-01-0013 · Cited by 12
Cultivating long-term well-being through transformative undergraduate education
White, H. C., Allen, D. M., Buffinton, K. W., Humphrey, D., Malpiede, M., Miller, R. K., & Volin, J. C. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae372 · Cited by 13
“Whether through mentoring or not, fostering a growth mindset in both students and faculty also has the potential to improve learning outcomes for all students (48), and particularly for marginalized students (49).”
BackgroundSutter, C. C., Totonchi, D. A., DeCoster, J., Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102484 · Cited by 15
Growth mindset in high school mathematics: A review of the literature since 2007
Stohlmann, M. S., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.202424437 · Cited by 15
“In a study at the college level when faculty members firmly believed that intelligence is fixed there were greater racial achievement gaps (Canning et al., 2019).”
Examining Educational Debts in Student Preparation for General Chemistry
Caushi, K., Torres, D., & Abrams, B. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01073 · Cited by 11
Tokuhama‐Espinosa, T., Simmers, K., Batchelor, D., Nelson, A. D., & Borja, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1220664 · Cited by 23
“Research on mindsets in educational settings has demonstrated that the mindset of the teacher can be as impactful (if not more so) as that of the student, in terms of a student’s beliefs about their own abilities in the classroom, and ostensibly, to solve-problems (Seaton, 2018; Canning et al., 2019; Frondozo et al.,…”
BackgroundEmbracing complexity: an inclusive framework for the scholarship of educational development
Cruz, L. E., Dickens, E., Flaming, A. L. B., & Wheeler, L. B. (2021) · The International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2021.1901102 · Cited by 16
The influence of male faces on stereotype activation among women in STEM: An ERP investigation
Wu, D. J., Park, J., & Dasgupta, N. (2020) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107948 · Cited by 12
Barber, C. R., McCollum, J. K., & Maboudian, W. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108766890.012
All In: Understanding and Motivating Stakeholders to Create an Equitable Culture of Student Success
Weatherton, M., Ko, M. E., Nichols, E. L., Krishnan, S., & Faber, C. J. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-02-0065 · Cited by 12
Rutten, L. D., Zengilowski, A., Lyra, F., Woznicki, N. W., & Muenks, K. M. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102319 · Cited by 12
Self-citationPeretz‐Lange, R., Gonzalez, G. D. S., & Hess, Y. D. (2024) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12993 · Cited by 9
The Recursive Cycle of Perceived Mindset and Psychological Distress in College
Kroeper, K. M., Hildebrand, L. K., Jiang, T., Hernandez-Colmenares, A., Brown, K., Wilk, A. V., Spencer, S. J., Heckler, A. F., & Fujita, K. (2024) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506241247384 · Cited by 11
“Prior studies have established that perceived classroom mindset beliefs can predict psychological distress (Canning et al., 2019, 2022; LaCosse et al., 2021; Muenks et al., 2020; Yeager & Dweck, 2023; Yeager et al., 2022).”
InfluentialGreenall, R. F., de Alba, J. G., Nichols, S., Allen, G. E. K., & Bailey, E. G. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.23-01-0010 · Cited by 7
“…on student deficits due to a lack of cultural competency and awareness (Lett and Wright, 2003; Espinosa, 2011; Leggon, 2011; Strayhorn et al. , 2013; McGee, 2016; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016; Alonzo et al. , 2019; Canning et al. , 2019; Miriti, 2020).”
From safety net to trampoline: elevating learning with growth mindset in healthcare simulation
Hopkins, S. R., Rae, V. I., Smith, S. E., Meldrum, S., & Tallentire, V. R. (2023) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-023-00264-1 · Cited by 8
“The literature also supports that learners gain more benefit from a growth mindset intervention if educators themselves have a growth mindset [32, 33].”
BackgroundPark, L. E., O’Brien, C., Italiano, A., Ward, D. E., & Panlilio, Z. A. (2023) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2023.2207836 · Cited by 8
“, the belief that intelligence is malleable) reported more negative experiences in their courses (Canning et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialMason, S., Weeden, E., & Bogaard, D. (2022) · Conference on Information Technology Education · doi:10.1145/3537674.3554750 · Cited by 9
“Canning, Meunks, Green and Murphy analyzed self-reported mindset beliefs of STEM faculty as a predictor of student performance of 150 professors and more than 15,000 students across 634 STEM courses [3].”
BackgroundYoshinobu, S., Jones, M. G., Hayward, C. N., Schumacher, C., & Laursen, S. L. (2022) · PRIMUS · doi:10.1080/10511970.2022.2072427 · Cited by 5
“Thus the workshop must address fundamental instructor beliefs about how students learn and what experiences support better learning outcomes [3,12].”
BackgroundShifting Beliefs in Computer Science: Change in CS Student Mindsets
Flanigan, A. E., Peteranetz, M. S., Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3471574 · Cited by 10
Shields, G. C., & Feller, S. (2020) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.26370 · Cited by 8
Developmental science concepts guide effective support of underrepresented STEM students
Singer-Freeman, K., & Bastone, L. (2019) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.21292 · Cited by 8
Tripp, B., Ravi, A., Pang, E., & Furrow, R. E. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-06-0167 · Cited by 11
“…(Moos and Moos, 1978; Kwong and Davis, 2015; Zysberg and Schwabsky, 2021), instructor gender (Harris et al. , 2020), instructor mindset (Dweck, 2008; Canning et al. , 2019; Muenks et al. , 2020), and the specific type of summative assessments utilized by faculty (such as multiple choice exams,…”
York, A. M., Miller, K. G., Cahill, M. J., Bernstein, M. A., Barber, A. M., Blomgren, H. E., & Frey, R. F. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.23-04-0055 · Cited by 7
“Furthermore, whether an instructor endorses a growth (vs. fixed) mindset culture is a stronger predictor of achievement and motivation than any other instructor characteristic (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, and teaching experience; Canning et al. , 2019).”
BackgroundKattoum, R. N., Montenegro‐Montenegro, E., & Baillie, M. T. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00971 · Cited by 13
“5,26 While these studies are insightful, they were conducted at predominantly White and selective institutions within the general STEM context.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Canning, Elizabeth A.
- Murphy, Mary C.
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- eaau4734-eaau4734
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6377274
- OpenAlex
- W2913734454
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 27
- FWCI
- 72.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DRL-1450755, HRD-1661004)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- fixed mindset, growth mindset, faculty beliefs, racial achievement gap, underrepresented minority students, student motivation, STEM education, course evaluation, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review