Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The age of Clovis—13,050 to 12,750 cal yr B.P.

Waters, Michael R., Stafford, Thomas W., Carlson, David L.·2020·Science Advances

Abstract

The Clovis complex dates from 13,050 to 12,750 cal yr B.P. during a time of major environmental change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0455

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. M. I. Eren B. Buchanan Clovis Technology in eLS (John Wiley & Sons 2016). · DOI
  2. D. S. Miller V. T. Holliday J. Bright Clovis across the continent in Paleoamerican Odyssey K. E. Graf C. V. Ketron M. R. Waters Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press College Station 2014) pp. 207–220.
  3. 10.1126/science.1137166 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1179/2055556315Z.00000000016 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s12520-013-0168-x · DOI
  6. M. Prasciunas T. A. Surovell Reevaluating the duration of Clovis: The problem of non-representative radiocarbon dates age estimates for the duration of the Clovis complex in Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding A. M. Smallwood T. A. Jennings Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press College Station 2015) pp. 21–35.
  7. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.023 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90078-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1803624115 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0033822200043538 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1420650112 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/20555563.2018.1531277 · DOI
  13. C. V. Haynes Jr. Contributions of radiocarbon dating to the geochronology of the peopling of the new world in Radiocarbon After Four Decades: An International Perspective R. E. Taylor A. Long R. S. Kra Eds. (Springer-Verlag New York 1992) pp. 355–375. · DOI
  14. L. A. Hannus Clovis Mammoth Butchery: The Lange/Ferguson Site and Associated Bone Tool Technology (Texas A&M Univ. Press College Station 2018).
  15. T. W. Stafford Jr. Chronology of the Kennewick Man Skeleton in Kennewick Man: The Scientific Investigation of an Ancient American Skeleton D. W. Owsley R. L. Jantz Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press College Station 2014) pp. 59–89.
  16. J. A. M. Gingerich Revisiting Shawnee-Minisink in In the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition J. A. M. Gingerich Ed. (University of Utah Press Salt Lake City 2013) pp. 218–256. · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0002731600047521 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/aaq.2020.8 · DOI
  19. 10.7183/0002-7316.75.4.907 · DOI
  20. J. E. Morrow S. J. Fiedel New radiocarbon Dates for the Clovis Component of the Anzick Site Park County Montana in Paleoindian Archaeology: A Hemispheric Perspective J. E. Morrow C. Gnecco Eds. (University Press of Florida Gainesville 2006) pp. 123–138.
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0704215104 · DOI · Paper page
  22. M. R. Waters T. W. Stafford Jr. The First Americans: A Review of the Evidence for the Late-Pleistocene Peopling of the America in Paleoamerican Odyssey K. E. Graf C. V. Ketron M. R. Waters Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press College Station 2014) pp. 541–560.
  23. C. V. Haynes Jr. B. B. Huckell Murray Springs: A Clovis Site with Multiple Activity Areas in the San Pedro Valley Arizona (University of Arizona Press Tucson 2007).
  24. D. S. Brose Archaeological Investigations at the Paleo Crossing Site A Paleoindian Occupation in Medina County Ohio in The First Discovery of America: Archaeological Evidence of the Early Inhabitants of the Ohio Area W. S. Dancey Ed. (Ohio Archaeological Council Columbus 1994) pp. 61–76.
  25. C. A. Hemmings dissertation University of Florida (2004).
  26. 10.1038/s41598-019-38779-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.09.033 · DOI
  28. D. Stanford Pre-Clovis Occupation South of the Ice Sheets in Early Man in the New World R. Shutler Jr. Ed. (Sage Press Beverly Hills) pp. 65–72.
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1404546111 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.172 · DOI
  31. 10.1179/2055556314Z.0000000009 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/gea.10121 · DOI
  33. G. C. Frison, A 14C date on a Late-Pleistocene Camelops at the Casper-Hell Gap Site, Wyoming. Curr. Res. Pleistocene 17, 28–29 (2000).
  34. C. V. Haynes Jr. J. M. Warnica Geology Archaeology and Climate Change in Blackwater Draw New Mexico: F. Earl Green and the Geoarchaeology of the Clovis Type Site (Eastern New Mexico University Portales 2012) vol. 15.
  35. 10.1126/science.1218443 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1126/science.aax9830 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.7183/0002-7316.80.2.376 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/20555563.2016.1174559 · DOI
  39. T. Goebel J. L. Keene Are Great Basin Stemmed Points as Old as Clovis in the Intermountain West? A Review of the Geochronological Evidence in Archaeology in the Great Basin and Southwest: Papers in Honor of Don D. Fowler N. J. Parezo J. C. Janetski Eds. (University of Utah Press Salt Lake City 2014) pp. 35–60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waters, M. R., Stafford, T. W., & Carlson, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4352, USA.
  • Stafford Research Laboratories, 200 Acadia Avenue, Lafayette, CO 80026-1845, USA.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-10-23
Volume
6
Issue
43
ISSN
2375-2548
Cited by
98
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review