Cited by 145

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GABARAP sequesters the FLCN-FNIP tumor suppressor complex to couple autophagy with lysosomal biogenesis

Goodwin, Jonathan M., Walkup, Ward G., Hooper, Kirsty, Li, Taoyingnan, Kishi-Itakura, Chieko, Ng, Aylwin, Lehmberg, Timothy, Jha, Archana, Kommineni, Sravya, Fletcher, Katherine, Garcia-Fortanet, Jorge, Fan, Yaya, Tang, Qing, Wei, Menghao, Agrawal, Asmita, Budhe, Sagar R., Rouduri, Sreekanth R., Baird, Dan, Saunders, Jeff, Kiselar, Janna, Chance, Mark R., Ballabio, Andrea, Appleton, Brent A., Brumell, John H., Florey, Oliver, Murphy, Leon O.·2021·Science Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Membrane conjugation of GABARAP sequesters the FLCN-FNIP complex to coordinate activation of MiT/TFE family transcription factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abj2485

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under certain stress conditions, such as treatment with lysosomal ionophores, lipidation of GABARAP sequesters the FLCN/FNIP complex, inhibiting its GAP activity and resulting in TFEB and TFE3 activation.

    “Under certain stress conditions, such as treatment with lysosomal ionophores, lipidation of GABARAP serves as a mechanism to sequester the FLCN/FNIP complex, inhibiting its GAP activity and resulting in TFEB and TFE3 activation30.”

    From TMEM55B links autophagy flux, lysosomal repair, and TFE3 activation in response to oxidative stress (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results report that the ionophore monensin induces FLCN-FNIP1 sequestration and FNIP1-LIR-dependent TFEB activation; the Fig. 7 model links GABARAP-dependent sequestration to nuclear retention of TFEB/TFE3. But the Results describe inhibition of FLCN-FNIP GAP activity as a proposed mechanism (“could inhibit”), so the claim states that step more definitively than the source does. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044908 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrm4024 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41580-019-0185-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1080/15548627.2017.1287653 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.05.015 · DOI
  7. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071649 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nrm3565 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1174447 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/scisignal.2004754 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.15252/embj.201797840 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.007 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41556-020-00583-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41556-020-0549-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/ncomms5681 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ncomms1735 · DOI
  17. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1751 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.4161/15548627.2014.984277 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/ncb3114 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.016 · DOI
  21. 10.4161/auto.29640 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015793 · DOI
  23. 10.1083/jcb.201209135 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s41467-019-10059-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.aax0364 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.036 · DOI
  27. 10.1083/jcb.201712177 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/s41586-020-2444-0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.7554/eLife.19960 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41556-018-0148-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1023683 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ijms.2011.07.015 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.018 · DOI
  34. 10.1083/jcb.201501002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M509157200 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.044 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41556-021-00644-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1707792114 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1126/science.1227026 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.002 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41467-018-05862-6 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/sciadv.abb9036 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/s41573-019-0036-1 · DOI
  44. 10.1126/science.aan6298 · DOI
  45. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00087.x · DOI
  46. 10.1242/jcs.164293 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/7651_2017_8 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/nar/gks042 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1126/science.aah5298 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.004 · DOI
  51. 10.7554/eLife.17290 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41556-019-0274-9 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.035 · DOI
  54. 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  56. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
  58. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1006/abio.1996.0067 · DOI
  61. 10.1073/pnas.0508123103 · DOI
  62. 10.7554/eLife.16813 · DOI
  63. 10.1128/IAI.01275-08 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goodwin, J. M., Walkup, W. G., Hooper, K., Li, T., Kishi-Itakura, C., Ng, A., Lehmberg, T., Jha, A., Kommineni, S., Fletcher, K., Garcia-Fortanet, J., Fan, Y., Tang, Q., Wei, M., Agrawal, A., Budhe, S. R., Rouduri, S. R., Baird, D., Saunders, J., Kiselar, J., Chance, M. R., Ballabio, A., Appleton, B. A., Brumell, J. H., Florey, O., & Murphy, L. O.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2021-10
Volume
7
Issue
40
ISSN
2375-2548
Cited by
145
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review