Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural mechanism of a Rag GTPase activation checkpoint by the lysosomal folliculin complex

Lawrence, Rosalie E., Fromm, Simon A., Fu, Yangxue, Yokom, Adam L., Kim, Do Jin, Thelen, Ashley M., Young, Lindsey N., Lim, Chun-Yan, Samelson, Avi J., Hurley, James H., Zoncu, Roberto·2019·Science

Abstract

Cellular response to nutrient status: An intricate regulatory mechanism is taking shape around control of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) protein kinase complex. Physiological responses of cells to nutrient abundance is regulated by signaling through mTORC1, which interacts with a complex of other proteins at the lysosome that includes small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), GTPase-activating proteins, and others. Lawrence et al. present a cryo–electron microscopy structure and biochemical experiments that reveal that the small GTPases act in unanticipated ways in the complex. The tumor suppressor folliculin (FLCN), along with FLCN-interacting protein 2, interacts with its partner GTPase RagC in both active and inactive states, suggesting that a particularly elaborate and stringent regulatory mechanism is at work. Science , this issue p. 971

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aax0364

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1126/science.1157535 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature11745 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00364-7 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.aay0166 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.aax3939 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/scisignal.2004112 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00104-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0603781103 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.02.022 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.016 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0908853106 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/gad.287953.116 · DOI
  13. 10.1083/jcb.201712177 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.96.12.7065 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41556-018-0148-6 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fgene.2012.00283 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.016 · DOI
  18. 10.1101/gad.16968011 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1083/jcb.200106039 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/365347a0 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1062023 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nsb0997-686 · DOI
  23. 10.1074/jbc.AC119.007382 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/hmg/ddz158 · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015793 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.012 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/emboj.2012.32 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.4161/auto.19653 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/scisignal.2002790 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-018-05862-6 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.044 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/hmg/ddg178 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.0931430100 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 · DOI
  35. 10.7554/eLife.42166 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  41. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
  43. 10.7554/eLife.27131 · DOI
  44. 10.1107/S2059798317007859 · DOI
  45. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · DOI
  47. B. Webb A. Sali “Protein structure modeling with MODELLER” in Protein Structure Prediction D. Kihara Ed. (Methods in Molecular Biology Series Humana Press 2014) pp. 1–15. · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/bip.22046 · DOI
  50. 10.1098/rsob.150174 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1073/pnas.1110415108 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1073/pnas.1811727115 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.026 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Lawrence, R. E., Fromm, S. A., Fu, Y., Yokom, A. L., Kim, D. J., Thelen, A. M., Young, L. N., Lim, C.-Y., Samelson, A. J., Hurley, J. H., & Zoncu, R.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-11-22
Volume
366
Issue
6468
Pages
971-977
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
192
References
16
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM111730, 1DP2CA195761-01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review