Cited by 4,474Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPlant and animal studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 136 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Defaunation in the Anthropocene

Open access

Abstract

We live amid a global wave of anthropogenically driven biodiversity loss: species and population extirpations and, critically, declines in local species abundance. Particularly, human impacts on animal biodiversity are an under-recognized form of global environmental change. Among terrestrial vertebrates, 322 species have become extinct since 1500, and populations of the remaining species show 25% average decline in abundance. Invertebrate patterns are equally dire: 67% of monitored populations show 45% mean abundance decline. Such animal declines will cascade onto ecosystem functioning and human well-being. Much remains unknown about this “Anthropocene defaunation”; these knowledge gaps hinder our capacity to predict and limit defaunation impacts. Clearly, however, defaunation is both a pervasive component of the planet’s sixth mass extinction and also a major driver of global ecological change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1251817

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

6 of 136 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 104 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The year 1500 is a representative starting point for the recent wave of extinction.

    “(a date representative of onset of the recent wave of extinction, as formal definition of the start of the Anthropocene still being debated)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In many parts of the world, wild animal food sources are a critical part of the diet, particularly for the poor.

    “In many parts of the world, wild animal food sources are a critical part of the diet, particularly for the poor.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The indirect evolutionary effects of defaunation on species not directly impacted by human defaunation are still poorly studied.

    “Still poorly studied are the indirect evolutionary effects of defaunation on other species, not directly impacted by human defaunation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Arthropod pests are responsible for 8-15% of the losses in most major food crops.

    “For example, arthropod pests are responsible for 8-15% of the losses in most major food crops.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Continued human population growth and increasingly uneven per-capita consumption ultimately drive all these threats.

    “continued human population growth and increasingly uneven per-capita consumption, which ultimately drive all these threats”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 164 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Mora C., Rollo A., Tittensor D. P., Science 443, 295 (2013).
  2. Ceballos G., García A., Ehrlich P. R., J. Cosmol. 8, 1821 (2010).
  3. Myers N., Int. Wildl. 5, 5 (1975).
  4. 10.1017/S0030605300032105 · DOI
  5. Aebischer N., Potts G., Methods 38, 4 (1990).
  6. Moore N., Odonatologica 20, 203 (1991).
  7. Lyons S. K., Smith F. A., Brown J. H., Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 339 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,101–1,200 of 4,205

Metadata

Authors
Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dirzo, Rodolfo
Venue
Science
Published
2014-07-25
Volume
345
Issue
6195
Pages
401-406
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2100135944
Cited by
4,474
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 382 · 2025: 425 · 2024: 397 · 2023: 475 · 2022: 501 · 2021: 494 · 2020: 416 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 294 · 2017: 280 · 2016: 189 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 39
FWCI
16.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Natural Environment Research Council (CEH010010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
defaunation, biodiversity loss, species abundance decline, extinction, invertebrates, terrestrial vertebrates, sixth mass extinction, ecosystem functioning, Anthropocene
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Humans, Human Activities, Insecta, Invertebrates, Mammals, Pest Control, Population, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological, Pollination, Endangered Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review