Cited by 524Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

A Protein-Counting Mechanism for Telomere Length Regulation in Yeast

Open access
Marcand, Stéphane, Gilson, Eric, Shore, David·1997·Science

Abstract

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , telomere elongation is negatively regulated by the telomere repeat-binding protein Rap1p, such that a narrow length distribution of telomere repeat tracts is observed. This length regulation was shown to function independently of the orientation of the telomere repeats. The number of repeats at an individual telomere was reduced when hybrid proteins containing the Rap1p carboxyl terminus were targeted there by a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The extent of this telomere tract shortening was proportional to the number of targeted molecules, consistent with a feedback mechanism of telomere length regulation that can discriminate the precise number of Rap1p molecules bound to the chromosome end.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.275.5302.986

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A strong common theme that has emerged is the likely involvement of a protein-counting mechanism in both yeast and mammals.

    “However, a strong common theme that has emerged is the likely involvement of a protein-counting mechanism in both systems (31, 44).”

    From Control of Human Telomere Length by TRF1 and TRF2 (2000) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcand, S., Gilson, E., & Shore, D.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
  • E. Gilson, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, UMR49 CNRS/ENSL, 69364 Lyon Cédex 07, France.
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Marcand, Stéphane
  • Shore, David
Venue
Science
Published
1997-02-14
Volume
275
Issue
5302
Pages
986-990
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1978002329
Cited by
524
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
23.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm040094-09)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 40094)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
telomere length regulation, Rap1p, feedback regulation, protein-DNA interactions, telomere elongation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomere shortening
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Fungal Proteins, Genetic Markers, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transformation, Genetic, Chromosomes, Fungal, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Telomere, Telomerase, GTP-Binding Proteins, rap GTP-Binding Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review