Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Earliest Pleistocene Hominid Cranial Remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: Taxonomy, Geological Setting, and Age

Gabunia, Leo, Vekua, Abesalom, Lordkipanidze, David, Swisher, Carl C., Ferring, Reid, Justus, Antje, Nioradze, Medea, Tvalchrelidze, Merab, Antón, Susan C., Bosinski, Gerhard, Jöris, Olaf, Lumley, Marie-A.-de, Majsuradze, Givi, Mouskhelishvili, Aleksander·2000·Science

Abstract

Archaeological excavations at the site of Dmanisi in the Republic of Georgia have uncovered two partial early Pleistocene hominid crania. The new fossils consist of a relatively complete cranium and a second relatively complete calvaria from the same site and stratigraphic unit that yielded a hominid mandible in 1991. In contrast with the uncertain taxonomic affinity of the mandible, the new fossils are comparable in size and morphology with Homo ergaster from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Paleontological, archaeological, geochronological, and paleomagnetic data from Dmanisi all indicate an earliest Pleistocene age of about 1.7 million years ago, supporting correlation of the new specimens with the Koobi Fora fossils. The Dmanisi fossils, in contrast with Pleistocene hominids from Western Europe and Eastern Asia, show clear African affinity and may represent the species that first migrated out of Africa.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.288.5468.1019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TCN ages obtained for the first appearance datum of H. erectus in Sangiran advocate for an early peopling of Sundaland by H. erectus, contemporary with their Chinese and Georgian counterparts, whose endocranial capacity was much smaller than specimens from Sangiran.

    “At a more general scale, our TCN ages obtained for the first appearance datum of H. erectus in Sangiran advocate for an early peopling of Sundaland by H. erectus, contemporary with their Chinese26,52 and Georgian53,54 counterparts, whose endocranial capacity was much smaller54 than specimens from Sangiran55.”

    From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1006/jhev.1999.0309 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199704)102:4<497::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  3. Gabunia L., Jahrb. RGZM 39, 185 (1992);
  4. 10.1038/373509a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/378275a0 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.287.5458.1622 · DOI
  7. R. G. Klein The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins (Univ. of Chicago Press ed. 2 Chicago 1999) pp. 1–810.
  8. O. Bar-Yosef in Early Human Behavior in Global Context: The Rise and Diversity of the Lower Palaeolithic Record M. D. Petraglia and R. Korisettar Eds. (Routledge Press London 1998) pp. 221–279.
  9. S. C. Antón F. Aziz Y. Zaim in Conference Proceedings of International Association for Study of Human Paleontology and International Association of Human Biologists “Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia” (Edizioni Cadmo/Casalini Libri Fiesole Italy 2000) pp. 97–108. W. R. Leonard and M. L. Robertson in On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups S. Boinski and P. A. Garber Eds. (Univ. of Chicago Press Chicago IL 2000) pp. 628–648.
  10. Dzaparidze V., et al., Jahrb. RGZM 36, 67 (1989).
  11. Bräuer G., Henke W., Schultz M., Jahrb. RGZM 42, 183 (1996);
  12. 10.1006/jhev.1996.0037 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199810)107:2<145::AID-AJPA2>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tattersall I., Doss. Sci. I, 70 (1999).
  15. 10.1038/373472a0 · DOI
  16. Majsuradze G., Jahrb. RGZM 42, 25 (1996).
  17. Gabunia L., Justus A., Vekua A., Lordkipanidze D., Archaeol. Korrespond. 29, 299 (1999).
  18. Gabunia L., Vekua A., Bugianishvili T., Newsl. Georgian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ser. 14, 344 (1988);
  19. Gabunia L., Vekua A., L'Anthropologie 99, 29 (1992).
  20. G. Bosinski in The Earliest Occupation of Europe W. Roebroeks and T. van Kolfschoten Eds. (Univ. of Leiden Press Leiden Netherlands 1995) pp. 263–268.
  21. Schmincke H. U., van den Bogaard P., Jahrb. RGZM 42, 75 (1995).
  22. Sologasvili D. Z., Pavlenichvili E. S., Goguitchaichvili A. T., Jahrb. RGZM 42, 51 (1995).
  23. Vekua A., Jahrb. RGZM 42, 77 (1995).
  24. A. Justus and M. Nioradze in Dmanisi I J. Kopaliani Ed. (Georgian Academy of Sciences Tbilisi Republic of Georgia 1998) pp. 140–159.
  25. M. M. Rubinstejn et al. in Mezdunarodnoj kolokvium po prob. Grania mezdu neogenom I cetverticnoj sistemoj [ Papers International Colloquium: The Boundary Between the Neogene and Quaternary ] (Moscow Russia 1972) pp. 162–167.
  26. W. A. Berggren D. V. Kent C. C. Swisher III M.-P. Aubry in Geochronology Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation W. A. Berggren D. V. Kent M.-P. Aubry J. Hardenbol Eds. (Spec. Publ. No. 54 Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Tulsa OK 1995) pp. 129–212. · DOI
  27. J. J. Saunders and B. K. Dawson in Advances in Vertebrate Paleontology and Geochronology Y. Tomida L. Flynn L. L. Jacobs Eds. (National Science Museum Monographs no. 14 National Science Museum Tokyo) pp. 215–242. Concentrations of fossil vertebrates within discrete podlike structures were interpreted as infills within excavated zones hollowed out by groundwater piping adjacent to a nearby river system.
  28. E. Aguirre et al. in The Pleistocene Boundary and the Beginning of the Quaternary J. A. Van Couvering Ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 1997) pp. 114–128.
  29. 10.1038/385333a0 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/360732a0 · DOI
  31. 10.1006/jhev.1999.0383 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.8108729 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1006/jhev.1999.0383 · DOI
  34. Bartstra G.-J., Mod. Quat. Res. Southeast Asia 9, 99 (1985);
  35. 10.1016/0047-2484(92)90092-N · DOI
  36. 10.1002/evan.1360020105 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/1005632 · DOI
  38. Leonard W. R., Antón S. C., Robertson M. R., Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 28, 182 (1999);
  39. ; O. Bar-Yosef and A. Belfer-Cohen in The Dmanisi Conference Volume D. Lordkipanidze D. M. Otte O. Bar-Yosef Eds. (Liège Belgium in press).
  40. B. A. Wood Koobi Fora Research Project Volume 4 Hominid Cranial Remains From Koobi Fora (Clarendon Press Oxford 1991).
  41. A. Walker and R. Leakey in The Nariokotome Homo erectus Skeleton A. Walker and R. Leakey Eds. (Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge MA) pp. 63–94.
  42. Weidenreich F., Paleontol. Sinica Ser. D 10, 1 (1943).
  43. 10.1006/jhev.1996.0008 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0009-2541(97)00159-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gabunia, L., Vekua, A., Lordkipanidze, D., Swisher, C. C., Ferring, R., Justus, A., Nioradze, M., Tvalchrelidze, M., Antón, S. C., Bosinski, G., Jöris, O., Lumley, M.-A.-D., Majsuradze, G., & Mouskhelishvili, A.
Affiliations
  • Republic of Georgia National Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi, 380007, Republic of Georgia.
  • Department of Geology and Paleontology, Republic of Georgia State Museum, 3 Purtseladze Street, Tbilisi, 380007, Republic of Georgia.
  • Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA.
  • Department of Geography, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA.
  • Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Mainz, Germany.
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
  • Laboratoire Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Paris, France.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-05-12
Volume
288
Issue
5468
Pages
1019-1025
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
513
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review