The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Abstract
Food's environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most previous studies on sustainable meat have examined a limited range of aspects (e.g., Clark and Tilman 2017; Poore and Nemecek 2018)”
From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as Poore and Nemecek 2018
In the citing paper
“agricultural production-consumption cycle (including agricultural and food waste generation) contribute significant to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of about one-third annually which is a significant contribution for a single sector (3).”
From Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Banana Peel Briquetting (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Algae also demonstrate superior land efficiency over several plant-based sources, with nuts requiring 7.9 m2, pulses 7.3 m2, grains 4.6 m2, and peas 3.4 m2 of land per kg of protein [10].”
From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In terms of land-use efficiency, algal proteins require substantially less land than both animal- and plant-derived protein sources.”
From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Existing global comparisons of pasture-finished and grain-finished systems are incomplete as they do not account for both carbon opportunity cost and soil carbon sequestration.”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Reviews and meta-analyses of these studies conclude that pasture-finished systems have higher average production emissions [4, 6, 7].”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Most life-cycle assessments comparing the carbon footprint of beef production systems have been limited to production emissions.”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Recent meta-analyses show that pasture-finished systems have higher land-use intensity (measured as area per unit production) on average, since the amount of pasture needed in the finishing stage of pasture-finished cattle is much larger than the amount of cropland needed to provide grain for the finishing stage of grain-finished cattle [4, 6].”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“with 4.2 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from enteric fermentation, manure and pasture management, and fuel use in livestock production, 3.6 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from synthetic N fertilizer application and crop production for human and animal food, and 3.3 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from changes in land use for crop-livestock production systems.114”
From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cites
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,860
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 · Cited by 5,564
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13959 · Cited by 3,026
The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011 · Cited by 3,023
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- P. Smith M. Bustamante H. Ahammad H. Clark H. Dong E. A. Elsiddig H. Haberl R. Harper J. House M. Jafari O. Masera C. Mbow N. H. Ravindranath C. W. Rice C. Robledo Abad A. Romanovskaya F. Sperling F. N. Tubiello G. Berndes S. Bolwig H. Böttcher R. Bright F. Cherubini H. Chum E. Corbera F. Creutzig M. Delucchi A. Faaij J. Fargione G. Hänsel G. Heath M. Herrero R. Houghton H. Jacobs A. K. Jain E. Kato O. Lucon D. Pauly R. Plevin A. Popp J. R. Porter B. Poulter S. Rose A. de Siqueira Pinto S. Sohi B. Stocker A. Strømman S. Suh J. van Minnen T. Krug G. Nabuurs M. Molodovskaya in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press 2015) pp. 811–922.
- IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007).
- J. Danielson, D. Gesch, An enhanced global elevation model generalized from multiple higher resolution source datasets. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XXXVII, 1857–1864 (2008).
- H. Kowata H. Moriyama K. Hayashi H. Kato in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector: Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food Chain Zurich Switzerland 12 to 14 November 2008 (Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART 2009) pp. 49–57.
- J. C. Fry in Detritus and Microbial Ecology in Aquaculture D. J. W. Moriarty R. S. V. Pullin Eds. (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management 1987) pp. 83–122.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “Review of maritime transport 2015” (UNCTAD 2015).
- National Development and Reform Commission of China “National data compilation of revenue and cost of agricultural products 2013” (China Statistics Press 2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,017
Falasco, S., Caputo, P., & Garrone, P. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141100 · Cited by 50
Coffay, M., Tveterås, R., Bocken, N. M. P., & Bogers, M. L. A. M. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3762 · Cited by 50
Pelton, R. E. O., Kazanski, C. E., Keerthi, S., Racette, K. A., Gennet, S., Springer, N., Yacobson, E., Wironen, M., Ray, D., Johnson, K., et al. (2024) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-024-01031-9 · Cited by 50
Mackenzie, S. G., & Davies, A. R. (2019) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106300 · Cited by 56
Schade, S., Stangl, G. I., & Meier, T. (2020) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-020-02181-6 · Cited by 52
D'Annolfo, R., Gemmill-Herren, B., Amudavi, D., Shiraku, H. W., Piva, M., & Garibaldi, L. A. (2021) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2020.1822639 · Cited by 49
On the Cross-Validation Bias due to Unsupervised Preprocessing
Moscovich, A., & Rosset, S. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/rssb.12537 · Cited by 55
Impact of Dietary Meat and Animal Products on GHG Footprints: The UK and the US
Barthelmie, R. J. (2022) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli10030043 · Cited by 49
Beyond agroecology: Agricultural rewilding, a prospect for livestock systems
Corson, M. S., Mondière, A., Morel, L., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2022) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103410 · Cited by 49
Plechatá, A., Morton, T. A., Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A., & Makransky, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18241-5 · Cited by 49
Can carbon labels encourage green food choices?
Kühne, S. J., Reijnen, E., Vogt, L. L., & Baumgartner, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902869 · Cited by 54
Ayoubi, M. S. E., & Radmehr, M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13264 · Cited by 49
Air-water interface properties and foam stabilization by mildly extracted lentil protein
Shen, P., Peng, J., Sagis, L. M. C., & Landman, J. (2023) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109342 · Cited by 49
Wali, M. E., Golroudbary, S. R., Krasławski, A., & Tuomisto, H. L. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01227-8 · Cited by 56
Frank, S. M., Jaacks, L. M., Meyer, K. A., Rose, D. D., Adair, L. S., Avery, C. L., & Taillie, L. S. (2024) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-024-01581-y · Cited by 49
Transforming agricultural land use through marginal gains in the food system
Alexander, P. M., Reddy, A., Brown, C., Henry, R., & Rounsevell, M. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101932 · Cited by 49
Effects of land‐use change on functional and taxonomic diversity of Neotropical bats
Farneda, F. Z., Meyer, C. F. J., & Grelle, C. E. V. (2019) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12736 · Cited by 49
Promoting ‘pro’, ‘low’, and ‘no’ meat consumption in Switzerland: The role of emotions in practices
Sahakian, M., Godin, L., & Courtin, I. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104637 · Cited by 49
Juvan, E., Grün, B., Baruca, P. Z., & Dolničar, S. (2021) · Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights · doi:10.1016/j.annale.2021.100010 · Cited by 49
Community supported agriculture: Setting the research agenda through a bibliometric analysis
Fomina, Y. A., Glinska-Newes, A. J., & Ignasiak-Szulc, A. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.007 · Cited by 49
Green, A., Nemecek, T., Smetana, S. M., & Mathys, A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127696 · Cited by 48
Self-citationBunge, A. C., Wickramasinghe, K. K., Renzella, J., Clark, M., Rayner, M., Rippin, H. L., Halloran, A., Roberts, N. W., & Breda, J. (2021) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00231-x · Cited by 48
Plechatá, A., Morton, T., Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A., & Makransky, G. (2022) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000080 · Cited by 48
Valorization of Local Legumes and Nuts as Key Components of the Mediterranean Diet
Hernández-López, I., Ortiz-Solà, J., Alamprese, C., Barros, L., Shelef, O., Basheer, L., Rivera, A., Abadías, M., & Aguiló‐Aguayo, I. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11233858 · Cited by 49
Geyik, Ö., Hadjikakou, M., & Bryan, B. A. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00648-y · Cited by 49
Muller, T., Bernier, M.-È., & Bazinet, L. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12183424 · Cited by 48
Hashemi, F., Mogensen, L., van der Werf, H. M. G., Cederberg, C., & Knudsen, M. T. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01415-6 · Cited by 48
Yang, X., Gao, Q., Duan, H., Zhu, M., & Wang, S. (2024) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-024-00978-z · Cited by 51
Xie, F. (2024) · Advanced Nanocomposites · doi:10.1016/j.adna.2024.07.002 · Cited by 48
Bridging compassion and justice in conservation ethics
Santiago‐Ávila, F. J., & Lynn, W. S. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108648 · Cited by 48
Advantages and challenges of Pickering emulsions applied to bio‐based films: a mini‐review
Niro, C. M., Medeiros, J. A., Freitas, J. A. M., & de Azeredo, H. M. C. (2020) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.11029 · Cited by 48
Morais, T. G., Teixeira, R. F. M., Lauk, C., Theurl, M. C., Winiwarter, W., Mayer, A. C. R., Kaufmann, L., Haberl, H., Domingos, T., & Erb, K. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102313 · Cited by 48
Microbial health hazards of recycling food waste as animal feed
Dame‐Korevaar, A., Boumans, I. J. M. M., Antonis, A. F. G., van Klink, E., & de Olde, E. M. (2021) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100062 · Cited by 48
Global trends of methane emissions and their impacts on ozone concentrations
Rita, V. D., Crippa, M., Greet, J.-M., Guizzardi, D., & Franciscus, D. (2018) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2760/820175 · Cited by 48
Aikins, E. F., & Ramanathan, U. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2019-0478 · Cited by 49
Guiding Nutritious Food Choices and Diets along Food Systems
Pretorius, B., Ambuko, J., Papargyropoulou, E., & Schönfeldt, H. C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179501 · Cited by 47
Hanley‐Cook, G., Huybrechts, I., Biessy, C., Remans, R., Kennedy, G., Deschasaux, M., Murray, K. A., Touvier, M., Skeie, G., Kesse‐Guyot, E., et al. (2021) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003834 · Cited by 48
Feng, B., Zhuo, L., Mekonnen, M. M., Marston, L. T., Yang, X., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, W., Li, Z., Li, M., et al. (2022) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118803 · Cited by 47
Faccioli, M., Law, C., Caine, C. A., Berger, N., Yan, X., Weninger, F., Guell, C., Day, B., Smith, R., & Bateman, I. J. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00482-2 · Cited by 47
A Scoping Review of the Environmental Impacts and Nutrient Composition of Plant-Based Milks
Berardy, A., García, M. R., & Sabaté, J. (2022) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmac098 · Cited by 47
Potter, C., Pechey, R., Cook, B., Bateman, P. A., Stewart, C., Frie, K., Clark, M., Piernas, C., Rayner, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106312 · Cited by 47
RetractedEco-labels, conspicuous conservation and moral licensing: An indirect behavioural rebound effect
Barkemeyer, R., Young, W., Chintakayala, P. K., & Owen, A. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107649 · Cited by 53
Sustainability implications of rising global pork demand
Yu, W., & Jensen, J. D. (2022) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.1093/af/vfac070 · Cited by 47
Yan, X., Bai, X., Liu, X., & Liu, F. (2024) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138358 · Cited by 47
Addressing the safety of new food sources and production systems
Tan, Y. Q., Ong, H. C., Yong, A. M. H., Fattori, V., & Mukherjee, K. (2024) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13341 · Cited by 53
Kraak, V. I., & Aschemann‐Witzel, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-032021 · Cited by 51
Kumar, S., Kumari, S., Rana, S. S., Rana, R. S., Anwar, T., Qureshi, H., Saleh, M. A., Alamer, K. H., Attia, H., Erċışlı, S., et al. (2024) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106903 · Cited by 47
A review of policy levers to reduce meat production and consumption
Bryant, C. J., Couture, A. L., Ross, E., Clark, A., & Chapman, T. (2024) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107684 · Cited by 47
Springmann, M., Dinivitzer, E., Freund, F., Jensen, J. D., & Bouyssou, C. G. (2025) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-024-01097-5 · Cited by 53
Genomic and genetic insights into Mendel’s pea genes
Feng, C., Chen, B., Hofer, J. M. I., Shi, Y. Y., Jiang, M., Song, B., Cheng, H., Lu, L., Wang, L., Howard, A., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08891-6 · Cited by 47
The Future of Food: Environmental Lessons from E‑Commerce
Gee, I. M., Heard, B. R., Webber, M. E., & Miller, S. A. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c01731 · Cited by 47
Sustainable Agricultural Systems: A Bibliometrics Analysis of Ecological Modernization Approach
Rocchi, L., Boggia, A., & Paolotti, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12229635 · Cited by 47
How Do Consumers Perceive Cultured Meat in Croatia, Greece, and Spain?
Franceković, P., García-Torralba, L., Sakoulogeorga, E., Vučković, T., & Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13041284 · Cited by 47
The net contribution of livestock to the supply of human edible protein: the case of Ireland
Hennessy, D., Shalloo, L., van Zanten, H. H. E., Schop, M., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2021) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859621000642 · Cited by 49
Political Veganism: An Empirical Analysis of Vegans’ Motives, Aims, and Political Engagement
Kalte, D. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321720930179 · Cited by 46
Agro-ecology science relates to economic development but not global pesticide pollution
Wyckhuys, K. A. G., Zou, Y., Wanger, T. C., Zhou, W., Yubak Dhoj, G. C., & Lu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114529 · Cited by 46
Castaldi, S., Dembska, K., Antonelli, M., Petersson, T., Piccolo, M. G., & Valentini, R. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12916-9 · Cited by 46
Hader, J. D., Lane, T., Boxall, A. B. A., MacLeod, M., & Guardo, A. D. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156478 · Cited by 46
Hallström, E., Davis, J., Håkansson, N., Ahlgren, S., Åkesson, A., Wolk, A., & Sonesson, U. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133949 · Cited by 50
Effect of Climate Change Impact Menu Labels on Fast Food Ordering Choices Among US Adults
Wolfson, J. A., Musicus, A. A., Leung, C. W., Gearhardt, A. N., & Falbe, J. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48320 · Cited by 50
Cascaded de novo biosynthesis of lacto-proteins from CO 2 by engineered Pichia pastoris
Lv, X., Cui, S., Chen, J., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., Du, G., Liu, X., Chen, J., Ledesma‐Amaro, R., et al. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d3gc00867c · Cited by 46
Environmental and land use consequences of replacing milk and beef with plant-based alternatives
Costa, M. P., Saget, S., Zimmermann, B., Petig, E., Angenendt, E., Rees, R. M., Chadwick, D. R., Gibbons, J., Shrestha, S., Williams, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138826 · Cited by 48
Badjona, A., Bradshaw, R., Millman, C., Howarth, M., & Dubey, B. N. (2023) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2023.2245036 · Cited by 46
Ruzgys, S., & Pickering, G. J. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140300 · Cited by 52
Shahid, M., Shah, P., Mach, K., Hunt, B. R., Finnigan, T. J. A., Frost, G. S., Neal, B. C., & Hadjikakou, M. (2024) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100410 · Cited by 46
Greenhouse applications of solar photovoltaic driven heat pumps in northern environments
Asgari, N., Hayibo, K. S., Groza, J., Rana, S., & Pearce, J. M. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114920 · Cited by 46
Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for cultured meat
Todhunter, M. E., Jubair, S., Verma, R., Saqe, R., Shen, K., & Duffy, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1424012 · Cited by 51
Roberts, S., Jacquet, J., Majluf, P., & Hayek, M. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn9698 · Cited by 49
Manzano, P., & White, S. (2019) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr01555 · Cited by 46
A national approach for transformation of the UK food system
Bhunnoo, R., & Poppy, G. M. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-019-0019-8 · Cited by 46
Life cycle environmental impacts of food away from home and mitigation strategies—a review
Dai, T., Yang, Y., Lee, R., Fleischer, A. S., & Wemhoff, A. P. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110471 · Cited by 51
Vanham, D., & Leip, A. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139151 · Cited by 49
Raghoebar, S., van Kleef, E., & de Vet, E. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12135371 · Cited by 51
Guillaumie, L., Boiral, O., Baghdadli, A., & Mercille, G. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.17269/s41997-020-00394-3 · Cited by 46
Yeşiltaş, B., Echers, S. G., Lægsgaard, L., Brinch, M. L., Olsen, T. H., Marcatili, P., Overgaard, M. T., Hansen, E. B., Jacobsen, C., & García‐Moreno, P. J. (2021) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130217 · Cited by 46
Evaluating food supply chain emissions from Japanese household consumption
Li, X., Ouyang, Z., Zhang, Q., Shang, W., Huang, L., Wu, Y., & Gao, Y. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118080 · Cited by 47
Pérignon, M., & Darmon, N. (2021) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuab091 · Cited by 46
Consumer segments less or more willing to adopt foods with microalgae proteins
Van der Stricht, H., Hung, Y., Fischer, A. R. H., & Verbeke, W. (2024) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105047 · Cited by 45
The Complementary Roles for Plant-Source and Animal-Source Foods in Sustainable Healthy Diets
Comerford, K. B., Miller, G. D., Kapsak, W. R., & Brown, K. A. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13103469 · Cited by 45
Food values drive Chinese consumers' demand for meat and milk substitutes
Sun, J., Ortega, D. L., & Lin, W. T. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106392 · Cited by 47
Zira, S., Röös, E., Rydhmer, L., & Hoffmann, R. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.022 · Cited by 45
Industrialization progress and challenges of cultivated meat
Cai, J., Wang, S., Li, Y., Dong, S., Liang, J. L., Liu, Y., & Li, S. (2023) · Journal of Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jfutfo.2023.06.002 · Cited by 47
3D Bioprinting of Cultured Meat: A Promising Avenue of Meat Production
Guo, X., Wang, D., He, B., Hu, L., & Jiang, G. (2023) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-023-03195-x · Cited by 49
Land use planning, sustainable food production and rural development: A literature analysis
Jónsdóttir, S., & Gísladóttir, G. (2023) · Geography and sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.09.004 · Cited by 51
Cayolla, R. R., Escadas, M., McCullough, B. P., Biscaia, R., Cabilhas, A., & Santos, T. M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21758 · Cited by 45
Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Merfort, L., Luderer, G., Weindl, I., Bodirsky, B. L., Stevanović, M., Klein, D., Rodrigues, R., Bauer, N., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj3832 · Cited by 45
Ford, H., Zhang, Y., Gould, J., Danner, L., Bastian, S. E. P., & Yang, Q. (2024) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105208 · Cited by 48
The shift from meat to plant-based proteins: consumers and public policy
Siegrist, M., Michel, F., & Hartmann, C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101182 · Cited by 48
Towards a low-carbon footprint: Current status and prospects for aquaculture
Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Jin, J., Zhu, X., Han, D. C., & Xie, S. (2024) · Water Biology and Security · doi:10.1016/j.watbs.2024.100290 · Cited by 46
Babalola, O. O., Akinnusi, E., Ottu, P. O., Bridget, K., Oyubu, G., Ajiboye, S. A., Adio, W. S., Amafili, C. C., Adebimpe, H. O., Nwokafor, C. V., et al. (2025) · Aspects of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amolm.2025.100072 · Cited by 49
Schader, C., Curran, M. P., Heidenreich, A., Landert, J., Blockeel, J., Baumgart, L., Ssebunya, B. R., Moakes, S., Marton, S. M. R. R., Lazzarini, G. A., et al. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105503 · Cited by 45
Cultural Lock‐in and Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Case of Dairy/Beef Farmers in Norway
Burton, R. J. F., & Farstad, M. (2019) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/soru.12277 · Cited by 47
Gracía, A., & Gomez, M. I. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104148 · Cited by 45
Grasso, A. C., Olthof, M. R., van Dooren, C., Broekema, R., Visser, M., & Brouwer, I. A. (2020) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxaa322 · Cited by 47
Herzberg, R., Schmidt, T., & Keck, M. (2022) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01083-x · Cited by 51
Gibin, D., Simonetto, A., Zanini, B., & Gilioli, G. (2022) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106735 · Cited by 45
Hughes, A. C., Tougeron, K., Martin, D. A., Menga, F., Rosado, B. H. P., Villasante, S., Madgulkar, S., Gonçalves, F., Geneletti, D., Diele‐Viegas, L. M., et al. (2022) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109841 · Cited by 44
Fruit and vegetable consumption as a preventative strategy for non-communicable diseases
Woodside, J. V., Nugent, A. P., Moore, R. E., & McKinley, M. C. (2023) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665123002161 · Cited by 44
Usva, K., Hietala, S., Nousiainen, J. I., Vorne, V., Vieraankivi, M.-L., Jallinoja, M., & Leinonen, I. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137097 · Cited by 51
Is food insecurity related to sustainable and healthy eating behaviors?
Selçuk, K. T., Atan, R. M., Arslan, S., & Sahın, N. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-27694-8 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Poore, J., & Nemecek, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Agroscope (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Poore, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 360
- Issue
- 6392
- Pages
- 987-992
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2806569362
- Cited by
- 6,085
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1005 · 2025: 1069 · 2024: 960 · 2023: 896 · 2022: 808 · 2021: 694 · 2020: 401 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 41
- FWCI
- 253.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- food supply chain, producer heterogeneity, animal products, plant-based diet, dietary change, food packaging, food processors, retail companies, customer communication, environmental objectives
- MeSH terms
- Crop Production, Animals, Animal Feed, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Food, Food Supply, Humans, Aquaculture, Food Packaging, Livestock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
