The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Abstract
Food's environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most previous studies on sustainable meat have examined a limited range of aspects (e.g., Clark and Tilman 2017; Poore and Nemecek 2018)”
From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as Poore and Nemecek 2018
In the citing paper
“agricultural production-consumption cycle (including agricultural and food waste generation) contribute significant to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of about one-third annually which is a significant contribution for a single sector (3).”
From Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Banana Peel Briquetting (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Algae also demonstrate superior land efficiency over several plant-based sources, with nuts requiring 7.9 m2, pulses 7.3 m2, grains 4.6 m2, and peas 3.4 m2 of land per kg of protein [10].”
From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In terms of land-use efficiency, algal proteins require substantially less land than both animal- and plant-derived protein sources.”
From Navigating the potential of algal peptides: health effects, market applications, and scientific challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Existing global comparisons of pasture-finished and grain-finished systems are incomplete as they do not account for both carbon opportunity cost and soil carbon sequestration.”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Reviews and meta-analyses of these studies conclude that pasture-finished systems have higher average production emissions [4, 6, 7].”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Most life-cycle assessments comparing the carbon footprint of beef production systems have been limited to production emissions.”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Recent meta-analyses show that pasture-finished systems have higher land-use intensity (measured as area per unit production) on average, since the amount of pasture needed in the finishing stage of pasture-finished cattle is much larger than the amount of cropland needed to provide grain for the finishing stage of grain-finished cattle [4, 6].”
From Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“with 4.2 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from enteric fermentation, manure and pasture management, and fuel use in livestock production, 3.6 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from synthetic N fertilizer application and crop production for human and animal food, and 3.3 Gt CO2-eq year−1 from changes in land use for crop-livestock production systems.114”
From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cites
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,860
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 · Cited by 5,564
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13959 · Cited by 3,026
The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011 · Cited by 3,023
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- P. Smith M. Bustamante H. Ahammad H. Clark H. Dong E. A. Elsiddig H. Haberl R. Harper J. House M. Jafari O. Masera C. Mbow N. H. Ravindranath C. W. Rice C. Robledo Abad A. Romanovskaya F. Sperling F. N. Tubiello G. Berndes S. Bolwig H. Böttcher R. Bright F. Cherubini H. Chum E. Corbera F. Creutzig M. Delucchi A. Faaij J. Fargione G. Hänsel G. Heath M. Herrero R. Houghton H. Jacobs A. K. Jain E. Kato O. Lucon D. Pauly R. Plevin A. Popp J. R. Porter B. Poulter S. Rose A. de Siqueira Pinto S. Sohi B. Stocker A. Strømman S. Suh J. van Minnen T. Krug G. Nabuurs M. Molodovskaya in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press 2015) pp. 811–922.
- IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007).
- J. Danielson, D. Gesch, An enhanced global elevation model generalized from multiple higher resolution source datasets. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XXXVII, 1857–1864 (2008).
- H. Kowata H. Moriyama K. Hayashi H. Kato in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector: Towards a Sustainable Management of the Food Chain Zurich Switzerland 12 to 14 November 2008 (Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART 2009) pp. 49–57.
- J. C. Fry in Detritus and Microbial Ecology in Aquaculture D. J. W. Moriarty R. S. V. Pullin Eds. (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management 1987) pp. 83–122.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “Review of maritime transport 2015” (UNCTAD 2015).
- National Development and Reform Commission of China “National data compilation of revenue and cost of agricultural products 2013” (China Statistics Press 2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,017 of 1,017
EU land use futures: modelling food, bioenergy and carbon dynamics
Strapasson, A., Woods, J., Meessen, J., Mwabonje, O., Baudry, G., & Mbuk, K. (2020) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2020.100545 · Cited by 34
Dietary Protein and Muscle in Aging People: The Potential Role of the Gut Microbiome
Ni Lochlainn, M., Bowyer, R. C. E., & Steves, C. J. (2018) · doi:10.20944/preprints201806.0152.v1 · Cited by 138
Novel microalgae-based foods: what influences singaporean consumers’ acceptance?
Wassmann, B., Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. (2024) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105068 · Cited by 29
(2022) · Climate Change and Land · doi:10.1017/9781009157988.003 · Cited by 23
A Hierarchical Pyramid for Food Waste Based on a Social Innovation Perspective
Lombardi, M., & Costantino, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13094661 · Cited by 22
Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review
Bonnet, C., & Coinon, M. (2024) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105017 · Cited by 22
Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition
Resare Sahlin, K., Carolus, J., von Greyerz, K., Ekqvist, I., & Röös, E. (2022) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00737-5 · Cited by 17
Carbon opportunity cost increases carbon footprint advantage of grain-finished beef
Blaustein-Rejto, D., Soltis, N., & Blomqvist, L. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295035 · Cited by 17
The role of market concentration in the agrifood industry
Hernandez, M. A., Espinoza, A., Berrospi, M. L., Deconinck, K., Swinnen, J., & Vos, R. (2023) · doi:10.2499/p15738coll2.136567 · Cited by 13
Renggli, D., & Doyle, P. S. (2025) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/d4sm00687a · Cited by 11
Competition, trade, and sustainability in agriculture and food markets in Africa
Roberts, S. (2023) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grac041 · Cited by 9
Comparative life cycle assessment of industrial and artisanal spirulina production systems
Vannini, V., & Achten, W. M. J. (2025) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180184 · Cited by 9
Khaliq, M., Noor, Z., Moazzam, M., Saeed, F., Tul-Zohra, K., Tariq, E., Muhammad Shahbaz, H., & Khaliq, K. (2026) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2026.2637282 · Cited by 4
“Algae also demonstrate superior land efficiency over several plant-based sources, with nuts requiring 7.9 m 2 , pulses 7.3 m 2 , grains 4.6 m 2 , and peas 3.4 m 2 of land per kg of protein [10].”
InfluentialTechnological Progress and Climate Change: Evidence from the Agricultural Sector
Da Mata, D., Dotta, M., & Lobo, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4358828 · Cited by 4
Zhang, C., Chen, L., Wu, C., Wang, W., Zhou, X., Tang, X., & Feng, X. (2026) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.112912 · Cited by 4
Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Banana Peel Briquetting
Torres, M. V., & Aberilla, J. M. O. (2024) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1318/1/012027 · Cited by 2
Garcia, L., Stanley, P. L., Sacramento, J. P., Dillon, J. A., Thorbecke, M., Thompson, L. R., Ambike, V., Sharma, P., Xu, S., Chiavegato, M. B., et al. (2026) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104879 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Poore, J., & Nemecek, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Agroscope (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Poore, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 360
- Issue
- 6392
- Pages
- 987-992
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2806569362
- Cited by
- 6,085
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1005 · 2025: 1069 · 2024: 960 · 2023: 896 · 2022: 808 · 2021: 694 · 2020: 401 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 41
- FWCI
- 253.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- food supply chain, producer heterogeneity, animal products, plant-based diet, dietary change, food packaging, food processors, retail companies, customer communication, environmental objectives
- MeSH terms
- Crop Production, Animals, Animal Feed, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Food, Food Supply, Humans, Aquaculture, Food Packaging, Livestock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
