Cited by 145Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal and yeast genetics research

Experimental Induction of Fluconazole Resistance in Candida tropicalis ATCC 750

Open access
Barchiesi, Francesco, Calabrese, David, Sanglard, Dominique, Falconi Di Francesco, Luigi, Caselli, Francesca, Giannini, Daniele, Giacometti, Andrea, Gavaudan, Stefano +1 more·2000·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Candida tropicalis is less commonly isolated from clinical specimens than Candida albicans. Unlike C. albicans, which can be occasionally found as a commensal, C. tropicalis is almost always associated with the development of fungal infections. In addition, C. tropicalis has been reported to be resistant to fluconazole (FLC). To analyze the development of FLC resistance in C. tropicalis, an FLC-susceptible strain (ATCC 750) (MIC = 1.0 microg/ml) was cultured in liquid medium containing increasing FLC concentrations from 8.0 to 128 microg/ml. The strain developed variable degrees of FLC resistance which paralleled the concentrations of FLC used in the medium. The highest MICs of FLC were 16, 256, and 512 microg/ml for strains grown in medium with 8.0, 32, and 128 microg of FLC per ml, respectively. Development of resistance was rapid and could be observed already after a single subculture in azole-containing medium. The resistant strains were cross-resistant to itraconazole (MIC > 1.0 microg/ml) and terbinafine (MIC > 512 microg/ml) but not to amphotericin B. Isolates grown in FLC at concentrations of 8.0 and 32 microg/ml reverted to low MICs (1.0 microg/ml) after 12 and 11 passages in FLC-free medium, respectively. The MIC for one isolate grown in FLC (128 microg/ml) (128 R) reverted to 16 microg/ml but remained stable over 60 passages in FLC-free medium. Azole-resistant isolates revealed upregulation of two different multidrug efflux transporter genes: the major facilitators gene MDR1 and the ATP-binding cassette transporter CDR1. The development of FLC resistance in vitro correlated well with the results obtained in an experimental model of disseminated candidiasis. While FLC given at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day was effective in reducing the fungal burden of mice infected with the parent strain, the same dosing regimen was ineffective in mice infected with strain 128 R. Finally, the acquisition of in vitro FLC resistance in strain 128 R was related to a loss of virulence. The results of our study elucidate important characteristics and potential mechanisms of FLC resistance in C. tropicalis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.44.6.1578-1584.2000

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro induced resistance in C. tropicalis unveiled increased expression of CDR1 and MDR1, but there is no conclusive proof that these mechanisms act in clinical isolates.

    “In addition, in vitro induced resistance unveiled the presence of increased expression of multidrug transporter genes of two different families, the ABC transporters and the major facilitators, CDR1 and MDR1, respectively. Yet, there is no conclusive proof that these mechanisms are acting in clinical isolates [91].”
  • Previous studies with C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis demonstrated that resistance to fluconazole can be promoted following repeated in vitro exposure to the drug.

    “Previous studies with C. albicans (38), C. dubliniensis (59), and C. tropicalis (9) demonstrated that resistance to fluconazole can be promoted following repeated in vitro exposure to the drug.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barchiesi, F., Calabrese, D., Sanglard, D., Falconi Di Francesco, L., Caselli, F., Giannini, D., Giacometti, A., Gavaudan, S., & Scalise, G.
Affiliations
  • <!--label omitted: 1-->Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Ancona, Ancona, Italy1;
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche (IT)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2000-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1578-1584
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2160897556
Cited by
145
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida tropicalis, fluconazole resistance, antifungal resistance, multidrug efflux transporter, MDR1, CDR1, systemic candidiasis, antifungal susceptibility, Candida albicans comparison, experimental infection in mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Candida, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Virulence, Fluconazole, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review