Cited by 153Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFungal and yeast genetics research

Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay

Open access
Nett, Jeniel E., Cain, Michael T., Crawford, Kyler, Andes, David R.·2011·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Candida spp. infect medical devices, such as venous and urinary catheters, by adhering to the surface and forming a community of drug-resistant cells surrounded by a matrix. The ability to measure drug activity during this biofilm mode of growth is of interest for the investigation of resistance mechanisms and novel antifungal therapies. The tetrazolium salt (XTT) reduction assay is the test most commonly used to estimate viable biofilm growth and to examine the impact of biofilm therapies. The primary goal of the current experiments was to identify assay variables that affect the XTT assay result in order to improve assay reproducibility, sensitivity, and throughput for the study of antifungal activity. The species used in the current studies included Candida albicans , C. parapsilosis , and C. glabrata . The assay variables that were studied included the impact of culture conditions, the duration of biofilm growth, the timing and frequency of drug administration, the XTT source and concentration, and the duration of XTT incubation. The conditions that impacted the assay readout and altered assay sensitivity included the duration of biofilm growth, the frequency of drug dosing, and the duration of XTT incubation. Several factors were found to reduce time and assay expense, including the elimination of washing steps, the shortening of incubation times, and the use of lower XTT concentrations. A description of assay pitfalls and troubleshooting is included. Recognition of these technical variables should allow investigators to better design reproducible biofilm therapeutic studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.02273-10

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the XTT reduction assay as previously described, with minor modifications.

    “MBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the tetrazolium salt (XTT) reduction assay as previously described (66, 67), with minor modifications.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nett, J. E., Cain, M. T., Crawford, K., & Andes, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2011-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1426-1433
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2039795845
Cited by
153
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007899)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI073289)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida biofilms, antifungal susceptibility, Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, assay reproducibility, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tetrazolium Salts, Reproducibility of Results, Biofilms, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review