Cited by 13Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFungal and yeast genetics research

A Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, a Proton Pump Inhibitor, and Two Calcium Channel Blockers Inhibit Candida albicans Biofilms

Open access
Nobile, Clarissa J., Ennis, Craig L., Hartooni, Nairi, Johnson, Alexander D., Lohse, Matthew B.·2020·Microorganisms

Abstract

Biofilms formed by the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans are naturally resistant to many of the antifungal agents commonly used in the clinic. We screened a library containing 1600 clinically tested drug compounds to identify compounds that inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation. The compounds that emerged from the initial screen were validated in a secondary screen and then tested for (1) their abilities to disrupt mature biofilms and (2) for synergistic interactions with representatives of the three antifungal agents most commonly prescribed to treat Candida infections, fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. Twenty compounds had antibiofilm activity in at least one of the secondary assays and several affected biofilms but, at the same concentration, had little or no effect on planktonic (suspension) growth of C. albicans. Two calcium channel blockers, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and an azole-based proton pump inhibitor were among the hits, suggesting that members of these three classes of drugs or their derivatives may be useful for treating C. albicans biofilm infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/microorganisms8050756

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paroxetine promotes mitochondrial depolarization and membrane damage in yeast at 110-282 μM (40-101 μg/mL).

    “| Paroxetine (third generation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) | C. albicans, E. coli, A. baumanii | 110-282 µM (40-101 µg/mL) | Inhibits cell growth; promotes mitochondrial inhibits bacterial growth. depolarization and membrane damage in yeast, | [56,58,67-69] |”
  • Paroxetine inhibits cell growth in C. albicans, E. coli, and A. baumanii at 110-282 μM (40-101 μg/mL).

    “| Paroxetine (third generation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) | C. albicans, E. coli, A. baumanii | 110-282 µM (40-101 µg/mL) | Inhibits cell growth; promotes mitochondrial inhibits bacterial growth. depolarization and membrane damage in yeast, | [56,58,67-69] |”
  • Paroxetine inhibits bacterial growth at 110-282 μM (40-101 μg/mL).

    “| Paroxetine (third generation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) | C. albicans, E. coli, A. baumanii | 110-282 µM (40-101 µg/mL) | Inhibits cell growth; promotes mitochondrial inhibits bacterial growth. depolarization and membrane damage in yeast, | [56,58,67-69] |”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nobile, C. J., Ennis, C. L., Hartooni, N., Johnson, A. D., & Lohse, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Lohse, Matthew B.
Venue
Microorganisms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
756
ISSN
2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025579118
Cited by
13
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35GM124594, R41AI112038, R01AI083311, R43AI131710, F31DE028488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida albicans, biofilm inhibition, antifungal drug repurposing, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, fluconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, drug synergy, antifungal resistance, planktonic growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review