Cited by 228Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global AntifungalSurveillance Study: a 6.5-Year Analysis of Susceptibilitiesof Candida and Other Yeast Species to Fluconazole andVoriconazole by Standardized Disk Diffusion Testing

Open access
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Rinaldi, M. G., Barnes, R., Hu, B., Veselov, A. V., Tiraboschi, N., Nagy, E. +1 more·2005·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Fluconazole in vitro susceptibility test results for 140,767 yeasts were collected from 127 participating investigators in 39 countries from June 1997 through December 2003. Data were collected on 79,343 yeast isolates tested with voriconazole from 2001 through 2003. All investigators tested clinical yeast isolates by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) M44-A disk diffusion method. Test plates were automatically read and results were recorded with the BIOMIC Vision Image Analysis System. Species, drug, zone diameter, susceptibility category, and quality control results were collected quarterly via e-mail for analysis. Duplicate (the same patient, same species, and same susceptible-resistant biotype profile during any 7-day period) and uncontrolled test results were not analyzed. The 10 most common species of yeasts all showed less resistance to voriconazole than to fluconazole. Candida krusei showed the largest difference, with over 70% resistance to fluconazole and less than 8% to voriconazole. All species of yeasts tested were more susceptible to voriconazole than to fluconazole, assuming proposed interpretive breakpoints of ≥17 mm (susceptible) and≤ 13 mm (resistant) for voriconazole. MICs reported in this study were determined from the zone diameter in millimeters from the continuous agar gradient around each disk, which was calibrated with MICs determined from the standard CLSI M27-A2 broth dilution method by balanced-weight regression analysis. The results from this investigation demonstrate the broad spectrum of the azoles for most of the opportunistic yeast pathogens but also highlight several areas where resistance may be progressing and/or where previously rare species may be“ emerging.”

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.43.12.5848-5859.2005

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, Candida albicans accounts for less than 50% of all Candida bloodstream infections.

    “Presently, C albicans accounts for less than 50% of all BSIs caused by the Candida genus.3,[26][27][28][29][30]”
  • Interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine have been developed by considering data relating MICs to known resistance mechanisms, MIC distribution profiles, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and the relationship between in vitro activity and clinical outcomes.

    “Interpretive breakpoints for four systemically active antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine [5FC]) have been developed”
  • These CLSI methods are reproducible and accurate and provide clinically useful information comparable to that of antibacterial testing.

    “These methods are reproducible and accurate and provide clinically useful information that is comparable to that of antibacterial testing (223, 225, 226, 253).”
  • Among 13,338 BSI isolates of Candida (12 species from >200 institutions worldwide) tested by BMD at the University of Iowa between 1992 and 2004, resistance to fluconazole (MIC ≥64 μg/ml) was ≤3% for all species, with the exception of C. glabrata (9%) and C. krusei (40%).

    “Among 13,338 BSI isolates of Candida (12 species from > 200 institutions worldwide) tested by BMD at the University of Iowa between 1992 and 2004, resistance to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64 𝛍 g/ml) was ≤ 3% for all species, with the exception of C. glabrata (9%) and C. krusei (40%) (226).”
  • BSI isolates of C. glabrata from all four monitored geographic regions collected between 2001 and 2004 appear to be progressively more resistant to fluconazole.

    “glabrata from all four monitored geographic regions collected between 2001 and 2004 appear to be progressively more resistant to fluconazole (226).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Stelling, J. M., K. Travers, R. N. Jones, P. J. Turner, T. F. O'Brien, and S. B. Levy. 2005. Integrating Escherichia coli antimicrobiol susceptibility data from multiple surveillance programs. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:873-882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Rinaldi, M. G., Barnes, R., Hu, B., Veselov, A. V., Tiraboschi, N., Nagy, E., & Gibbs, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Wales (GB)
  • Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
  • Institute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Smolensk, Russia
  • Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín" (AR)
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • Giles Scientific, Inc., Santa Barbara, California
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2005-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
5848-5859
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2124750674
Cited by
228
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • University of Alberta
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antifungal susceptibility, Candida, yeast, fluconazole, voriconazole, azole resistance, Candida krusei, disk diffusion, interpretive breakpoints
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Population Surveillance, Pyrimidines, Triazoles, Global Health, Yeasts, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review