Cited by 179Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNosocomial Infections in ICUInfection Control in Healthcare

Nosocomial Candidemia in Non-Neutropenic Patients at an Italian Tertiary Care Hospital

Luzzati, R., Amalfitano, G., Lazzarini, L., Soldani, F., Bellino, S., Solbiati, M., Danzi, M. C., Vento, S. +3 more·2000·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

In a retrospective study conducted in an Italian tertiary care hospital, the incidence of nosocomial candidemia was evaluated together with causative pathogens, treatment, and risk factors for death. Over a 6-year period (1992-1997), a total of 189 episodes of candidemia occurred in 189 patients (mean age 58+/-19 years), accounting for an average incidence of 1.14 episodes per 10,000 patient-days per year. The most common reasons for hospitalization were solid neoplasia (21%), trauma (17%), abdominal diseases requiring surgery (13%), and cardiovascular diseases (13%). No patient was neutropenic within 3 weeks prior to the onset of candidemia. One hundred thirty patients were hospitalized in intensive care units, 47 patients in surgical wards, and 12 patients in medical wards. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated pathogen, accounting for 54% of fungal isolates, followed by Candida parapsilosis (23%), Candida glabrata (7%), Candida tropicalis (5%), Candida pelliculosa (4%), Candida lusitaniae (1%), Candida humicula (1%), and other non-albicans Candida spp. (5%). Seventy-six (41%) patients received adequate antifungal therapy. Seventy-one (58%) of the 123 evaluable patients with central venous catheters underwent line removal; 51 of them had catheter-related candidemia. The 30-day crude mortality rate was 45%. Older age, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, a longer duration of candidemia, retention of central lines, and inadequate antifungal therapy were significantly associated with poor outcome. In the present study, nosocomial candidemia was a frequent and relatively underestimated illness. Adequate antifungal therapy and central line removal independently reduced the high mortality of the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s100960000325

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Catheter removal is associated with reduced mortality in adults and neonates with candidemia.

    “includes data in which catheter removal was associated with reduced mortality in adults [108, 116] and neonates [117].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [116]

  • Most C. inconspicua isolates (70%) in the Majoros et al. report were from respiratory tract samples, but wound, blood, and genital isolates were also obtained.

    “Most isolates (70%) were from respiratory tract samples, but wound, blood, and genital isolates were also obtained.”
  • C. inconspicua may be especially common in Hungary, where Majoros et al. reported on 57 isolates from 48 patients.

    “C. inconspicua may be especially common in Hungary, where Majoros et al. (143) reported on 57 isolates from 48 patients.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luzzati, R., Amalfitano, G., Lazzarini, L., Soldani, F., Bellino, S., Solbiati, M., Danzi, M. C., Vento, S., Todeschini, G., Vivenza, C., & Concia, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Informa (Italy) (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
2000-09-05
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
602-607
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W2044026522
Cited by
179
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
nosocomial candidemia, non-neutropenic patients, Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, central venous catheters, catheter-related candidemia, antifungal therapy, mortality risk factors, intensive care unit, incidence, non-albicans Candida
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Candida, Candidiasis, Child, Cross Infection, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Causality, Incidence, Fungemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review