Cited by 350Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingEscherichia coli research studiesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Role of Multicellular Aggregates in Biofilm Formation

Open access
Kragh, Kasper N., Hutchison, Jaime B., Melaugh, Gavin, Rodesney, Chris, Roberts, Aled E. L., Irie, Yasuhiko, Jensen, Peter Ø., Diggle, Stephen P. +3 more·2016·mBio

Abstract

In traditional models of in vitro biofilm development, individual bacterial cells seed a surface, multiply, and mature into multicellular, three-dimensional structures. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms governing the initial attachment of single cells to surfaces. However, in natural environments and during infection, bacterial cells tend to clump as multicellular aggregates, and biofilms can also slough off aggregates as a part of the dispersal process. This makes it likely that biofilms are often seeded by aggregates and single cells, yet how these aggregates impact biofilm initiation and development is not known. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational approaches to determine the relative fitness of single cells and preformed aggregates during early development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. We find that the relative fitness of aggregates depends markedly on the density of surrounding single cells, i.e., the level of competition for growth resources. When competition between aggregates and single cells is low, an aggregate has a growth disadvantage because the aggregate interior has poor access to growth resources. However, if competition is high, aggregates exhibit higher fitness, because extending vertically above the surface gives cells at the top of aggregates better access to growth resources. Other advantages of seeding by aggregates, such as earlier switching to a biofilm-like phenotype and enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and immune response, may add to this ecological benefit. Our findings suggest that current models of biofilm formation should be reconsidered to incorporate the role of aggregates in biofilm initiation. IMPORTANCE During the past decades, there has been a consensus around the model of development of a biofilm, involving attachment of single planktonic bacterial cells to a surface and the subsequent development of a mature biofilm. This study presents results that call for a modification of this rigorous model. We show how free floating biofilm aggregates can have a profound local effect on biofilm development when attaching to a surface. Our findings show that an aggregate landing on a surface will eventually outcompete the biofilm population arising from single cells attached around the aggregate and dominate the local biofilm development. These results point to a regime where preformed biofilm aggregates may have a fitness advantage over planktonic cells when it comes to accessing nutrients. Our findings add to the increasingly prominent comprehension that biofilm lifestyle is the default for bacteria and that planktonic single cells may be only a transition state at the most.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.00237-16

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autoaggregation is often among the first steps in forming biofilms.

    “Autoaggregation is also often among the first steps in forming biofilms.”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Autoaggregation and microcolony formation are among the first steps in building a biofilm.

    “Autoaggregation and microcolony formation are among the first steps in building a biofilm.”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]

  • At high cell densities, aggregated cells have a competitive advantage over single cells because cells positioned at the top of the aggregate have more access to nutrients; at low cell densities, aggregated cells are at a disadvantage because cells in the middle of the aggregate have limited nutrient access.

    “At high cell densities, aggregated cells have a competitive advantage over single cells, as the cells positioned at the top of the aggregate have more access to nutrients. However, at low cell densities, the aggregated cells are at a disadvantage, as the cells in the middle of the aggregate have limited nutrient access [2].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Under high competition with single cells, cells positioned at top of aggregates enjoy a competitive advantage.

    “This view is supported by the recent work showing that, under high competition with single cells, cells positioned at the top of aggregates enjoy a competitive advantage [2].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Characklis WG, Marshall KC 1990 Biofilms. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kragh, K. N., Hutchison, J. B., Melaugh, G., Rodesney, C., Roberts, A. E. L., Irie, Y., Jensen, P. Ø., Diggle, S. P., Allen, R. J., Gordon, V., & Bjarnsholt, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Bjarnsholt, Thomas
Venue
mBio
Published
2016-05-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e00237-e00237
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
OpenAlex
W2307656886
Cited by
350
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 17
FWCI
19.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0081/2012)
  • Royal Society
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
biofilm formation, multicellular aggregates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm initiation, cell competition, planktonic cells, biofilm dispersal, antibiotic resistance, immune evasion
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Computer Simulation, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review