Cited by 136Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Genetic Analysis of Candida auris Implicates Hsp90 in Morphogenesis and Azole Tolerance and Cdr1 in Azole Resistance

Open access

Abstract

Fungal pathogens pose a serious threat to public health. Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that is often resistant to commonly used antifungal drugs. However, the mechanisms governing drug resistance and virulence in this organism remain largely unexplored. In this study, we adapted a conditional expression system to modulate the transcription of an essential gene, HSP90 , which regulates antifungal resistance and virulence in diverse fungal pathogens. We showed that Hsp90 is essential for growth in C. auris and is important for tolerance of the clinically important azole antifungals, which block ergosterol biosynthesis. Further, we established that the Cdr1 efflux transporter regulates azole resistance. Finally, we discovered that C. auris transitions from yeast to filamentous growth in response to Hsp90 inhibition, accompanied by global transcriptional remodeling. Overall, this work provides a novel insight into mechanisms regulating azole resistance in C. auris and uncovers a distinct developmental program regulated by Hsp90.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study adapted a tetracycline-repressible promoter system to show that Hsp90 is essential in *Candida auris*, mediates fluconazole tolerance in some clinical isolates, and represses filamentous growth. It also identifies the Cdr1 efflux transporter as a major contributor to azole resistance in *C. auris*.

Key findings

  • Hsp90 is essential in *C. auris*: doxycycline-mediated repression of tetO-HSP90 reduced HSP90 expression to less than 40% of wild-type and caused loss of viable colonies.
  • Hsp90 inhibition reduced fluconazole tolerance in *C. auris* clinical isolates CDC-382 and CDC-387 and transformed fluconazole activity from fungistatic to fungicidal, but did not affect high-level resistance in Ci6684 or CDC-388.
  • Deletion of CDR1 in strain Ci6684 caused an 8-fold decrease in fluconazole MIC, and CDR1 expression positively correlated with fluconazole MIC50 across clinical isolates (Pearson r = 0.59).
  • Hsp90 inhibition or depletion induced filamentous growth in *C. auris* and other CUG-clade species; RNA-Seq identified 2,111 *C. auris* DEGs upon geldanamycin treatment and 1,014 upon HSP90 depletion, with only 292 concordant DEGs.

Methods

  • A tetO-HSP90 conditional expression strain was constructed in fluconazole-resistant *C. auris* strain Ci6684 by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated promoter replacement, adapting a *C. albicans* system.
  • Drug susceptibility was assessed by spotting assays, fluconazole Etest strips, and checkerboard assays with fluconazole plus geldanamycin; CDR1 was deleted in Ci6684 and fluconazole MICs were measured.
  • Morphology was monitored by DIC microscopy after genetic depletion or pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 and after canonical filament-inducing cues; RNA-Seq was performed in quadruplicate and analyzed with HISAT2, StringTie, and DESeq2.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the role of filamentous growth in *C. auris* is unclear, that only one prior study reported filamentation under high salt, and that further exploration of cues and genetic circuitry is needed.
  • Evident from the text: CDR1 deletion was tested only in the Ci6684 background, and Hsp90’s role in fluconazole tolerance was limited to a subset of CDC clinical isolates.
  • Evident from the text: RNA-Seq used strain Ci6684 but reads were aligned to the B8441 reference genome, and the study notes that depletion and pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 produced distinct transcriptional responses.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.02529-18

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 63 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 19
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little is known about the mechanisms of azole resistance in C. auris, and genetic control of azole resistance in this organism has yet to be explored.

    “However, the mechanisms governing drug resistance and virulence in this organism remain largely unexplored.”
    “Despite the high incidence of azole resistance reported for C. auris isolates, little is known about the mechanisms involved.”
    “Despite these initial reports, genetic control of azole resistance has yet to be explored in C. auris.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • CDC-387 is both excluded from and described as showing fluconazole tolerance

    Minor

    The first passage identifies CDC-381 and CDC-382, but not CDC-387, as the tolerant isolates among the three more susceptible strains. The later passage describes geldanamycin as abolishing CDC-387's fluconazole tolerance.

  • Two different gene identifiers are assigned to the C. auris PHR1 ortholog

    Minor

    The Results and Discussion assign different gene identifiers to PHR1, leaving the identity of the reported upregulated gene inconsistent.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–136 of 136

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S. H., Iyer, K. R., Pardeshi, L., Muñoz, J. F., Robbins, N., Cuomo, C. A., Wong, K. H., & Cowen, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cowen, Leah E.
Venue
mBio
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
OpenAlex
W2912190166
Cited by
136
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN154288, 119520_1, MOP-86452)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI110818)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida auris, HSP90, azole resistance, yeast-to-hypha transition, morphogenesis, conditional gene expression, ergosterol biosynthesis, antifungal resistance, virulence, transcriptional remodeling, fungal pathogens
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candida, Drug Tolerance, Gene Deletion, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Membrane Transport Proteins, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review