The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcription Factor PU.1 Mediates Induction of c- fms in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: a Mechanism for Phenotypic Change to Phagocytic Cells
Abstract
The macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor encoded by the c-fms gene is expressed in vascular intimal smooth muscle cells isolated from atherosclerotic lesions. A combination of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and epidermal growth factor induces stable expression of c-fms in normal vascular medial smooth muscle cells. The mechanism by which these growth factors induce c-fms expression has now been investigated in an attempt to gain insight into the events that underlie the phenotypic conversion of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Deletion analysis of the c-fms promoter revealed that the region including a binding site for transcription factor PU.1 was required for transcriptional activity in human aortic medial smooth muscle cells. Mutation in the PU.1 binding site markedly reduced promoter activity. Northern (RNA) blot analysis demonstrated that growth factors induced the expression of PU.1 mRNA in vascular medial smooth muscle cells and that PU.1 mRNA was expressed in vascular intimal smooth muscle cells. PU.1 antisense oligonucleotides inhibited growth factor-induced c-fms expression and foam cell formation. These results suggest that transcription factor PU.1 plays an essential role in the phenotypic conversion of vascular smooth muscle cells to macrophagelike cells by mediating the induction of c-fms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The block in the development of lymphoid and myeloid lineages in PU.1 mutants occurs at very early stages because the mutant animals completely lack lymphoid and myeloid progenitor cells.
“The block in the development of these lineages occurs at very early stages, because the mutant animals completely lack lymphoid and myeloid progenitor cells, rendering it difficult to determine the precise role of PU.1 during stage- and lineage-specific gene expression.”
From AKT Induces Transcriptional Activity of PU.1 through Phosphorylation-mediated Modifications within Its Transactivation Domain (2001) · cites this paper as [68]
Targeted disruption of PU.1 in mice severely impairs the development of lymphoid (B cells) and myeloid (macrophages and neutrophils) lineages.
“Targeted disruption of PU.1 in mice severely impairs the development of lymphoid (B cells) and myeloid (macrophages and neutrophils) lineages.”
From AKT Induces Transcriptional Activity of PU.1 through Phosphorylation-mediated Modifications within Its Transactivation Domain (2001) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Zhang, D.-E., Hetherington, C. J., Chen, H.-M., & Tenen, D. G. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.1.373-381.1994 · Cited by 411
The proto-oncogene PU.1 regulates expression of the myeloid-specific CD11b promoter
Pahl, H. L., Scheibe, R. J., Zhang, D. E., Chen, H. M., Galson, D. L., Maki, R. A., & Tenen, D. G. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53496-7 · Cited by 301
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1093/nar/19.14.3893 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90077-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-Y · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2174572 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.3513311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.3296190 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-4800(73)90014-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.76.1.333 · DOI
- 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1044-1051.1982 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI115507 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI103182 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90472-0 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI117761 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42387-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42822-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)77275-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90219-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90620-E · DOI
- 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4408-4418.1994 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-X · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.180.6.2309 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1182/blood.V79.3.586.bloodjournal793586 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.3.801 · DOI
- 10.1038/362801a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90733-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/325549a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9150(88)90010-X · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/17.15.6419 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80047-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39976-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)40265-1 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM198901053200122 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.ATV.10.6.966 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5469 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90076-0 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ets target genes: past, present and future
Sementchenko, V. I., & Watson, D. K. (2000) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204034 · Cited by 371
The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages
Lloberas, J., Soler, C., & Celada, A. (1999) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01442-5 · Cited by 142
A Two-Step Mechanism for Recruitment of Pip by PU.1
Perkel, J. M., & Atchison, M. L. (1998) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.160.1.241 · Cited by 77
PU.1/Interferon Regulatory Factor Interactions; Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation
Marecki, S., & Fenton, M. J. (2000) · Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1385/cbb:33:2:127 · Cited by 74
Walton, M. R., Gibbons, H., MacGibbon, G. A., Sirimanne, E., Saura, J., Gluckman, P. D., & Dragunow, M. (2000) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(99)00262-3 · Cited by 73
Rieske, P., & Pongubala, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m007482200 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Inaba, T., Gotoda, T., Ishibashi, S., Harada, K., Ohsuga, J.-I., Ohashi, K., Yazaki, Y., & Yamada, N.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2264-2273
- ISSN
- 1098-5549
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review