Cited by 232Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiety: There is an app for that. A systematic review of anxiety apps: SUCALA et al.

Open access
Sucala, Madalina, Cuijpers, Pim, Muench, Frederick, Cardoș, Roxana, Soflau, Radu, Dobrean, Anca, Achimas-Cadariu, Patriciu, David, Daniel·2017·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphones and mobile devices have become ubiquitous, and with the rapid advance of technology, the number of health applications (apps) that are available for consumers on these devices is constantly growing. In particular, there has been a recent proliferation of anxiety apps. However, there has been no review of the quality or content of these anxiety apps and little is known about their purpose, the features they contain, and their empirical support. The goal of this systematic review was to assess the commercially available anxiety apps. METHODS: A list of anxiety apps was collected in January 2017, using the Power Search function of iTunes and Google Play. Of 5,078 identified apps, 52 met our inclusion criteria (i.e., being defined as an anxiety/worry relief app, and offering psychological techniques aimed primarily at reducing anxiety) and were further reviewed. RESULTS: The majority (67.3%) of the currently available anxiety apps were found to lack the involvement of health care professionals in their development, and very few (3.8%) of them have been rigorously tested. CONCLUSIONS: At the moment, although anxiety apps have the potential to enhance access to mental health care, there is a marked discrepancy between the wealth of commercially available apps, and the paucity of data regarding their efficacy and effectiveness. Although the great promise of apps is their ability to increasing access to evidence-based mental health, the field is not quite there yet and the full potential of apps for treating anxiety has yet to be exploited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22654

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous mobile apps aiming at managing depression and anxiety symptoms are available, but most have not been rigorously designed and tested, though there is some promising evidence of their effectiveness.

    “Numerous mobile apps aiming at managing depression and anxiety symptoms are also available. Although most of them have not been rigorously designed and tested, there is some promising evidence of their effectiveness that needs to be validated [33–35]”

    From Mobile Apps for the Management of Comorbid Overweight/Obesity and Depression/Anxiety: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports an abundance of anxiety apps, little efficacy evidence for most, and promising but limited results from two tested apps. The Introduction notes that few depression apps have been validated, but this review does not establish promising effectiveness for depression apps; its efficacy findings concern anxiety apps. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Numerous self-help online courses and mobile phone applications are becoming available, which are said to reduce stress and anxiety, and improve mood, yet have not been evaluated in controlled trials.

    “Numerous self-help online courses and mobile phone applications are becoming available, which are said to reduce stress and anxiety, and improve mood (e.g., Sucala et al., 2017), yet have not been evaluated in controlled trials.”

    From Online mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: Outcomes of a pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Sucala et al., 2017

    The Discussion reports an abundance of commercially available anxiety apps and says the large majority provided no efficacy data. It does not establish the claim about online courses, stress reduction, or improved mood. The Discussion’s Table 3 also identifies two apps evaluated in randomized controlled trials, so the blanket statement that the apps had not been evaluated in controlled trials overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The emerging field of m-mental health is in its infancy as many available apps lack scientific evidence or show poor content quality.

    “However, the emerging field of m-mental health can still be described as being in its infancy as many available apps lack scientific evidence (Donker et al., 2013; Sucala et al., 2017) or show poor content quality (Singer et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [33]33. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxi- ety Stress Scales. (2nd. Ed.) Sydney: Psychology Foundation. ISBN 7334- 1423-0.
  2. [62]62. Zetsche, M. T., & Margraf, U. J. (2007). Epidemiology of anxiety dis- orders. Psychiatry, 6, 136-142. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mppsy.2007.01.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sucala, M., Cuijpers, P., Muench, F., Cardoș, R., Soflau, R., Dobrean, A., Achimas-Cadariu, P., & David, D.
Affiliations
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy; Cluj-Napoca Romania
  • Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy; Department of Surgery; Cluj-Napoca Romania
Corresponding author
Sucala, Madalina
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-15
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
518-525
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2615858497
Cited by
232
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research (PN-II-RU-TE- 2014-4-0490)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mobile health, mobile application, anxiety reduction, psychological techniques, app quality, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review