Cited by 807Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Reduced fetal growth rate and increased risk of death from ischaemic heart disease: cohort study of 15 000 Swedish men and women born 1915-29

Open access
Leon, David A, Lithell, Hans O, Vågerö, Denny, Koupilová, Ilona, Mohsen, Rawya, Berglund, Lars, Lithell, Ulla-Britt, McKeigue, Paul M·1998·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To establish whether fetal growth rate (as distinct from size at birth) is associated with mortality from ischaemic heart disease. Design : Cohort study based on uniquely detailed obstetric records with 97% follow up over the entire life course and linkage to census data in adult life. Subjects : All 14 611 babies delivered at the Uppsala Academic Hospital, Sweden, during 1915-29 followed up to end of 1995. Main outcome measures : Mortality from ischaemic heart disease and other causes. Results : Cardiovascular disease showed an inverse association with birth weight for both men and women, although this was significant only for men. In men a 1000 g increase in birth weight was associated with a proportional reduction in the rate of ischaemic heart disease of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.90). Adjustment for socioeconomic circumstances at birth and in adult life led to slight attenuation of this effect. Relative to the lowest fourth of birth weight for gestational age, mortality from ischaemic heart disease in men in the second, third, and fourth fourths was 0.81 (0.66 to 0.98), 0.63 (0.50 to 0.78), and 0.67 (0.54 to 0.82), respectively. The inclusion of birth weight per se and birth weight for gestational age in the same model strengthened the association with birth weight for gestational age but removed the association with birth weight. Conclusions : This study provides by far the most persuasive evidence of a real association between size at birth and mortality from ischaemic heart disease in men, which cannot be explained by methodological artefact or socioeconomic confounding. It strongly suggests that it is variation in fetal growth rate rather than size at birth that is aetiologically important.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.241

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between poor growth in the womb and the risk of adult disease has been confirmed in many other countries, including Finland, Sweden, China, India, and the USA.

    “This relationship between poor growth in the womb and the risk of adult disease has since been confirmed in many other countries, including Finland (26), Sweden (332), China (183), India (517), and the USA (464).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [332]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Erikson R, Goldthorpe J. The constant flux. A study of class mobility in indus- trial countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  2. Stata Corporation. Stata reference manual: release 5. College Station, Texas: Stata Press, 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leon, D. A., Lithell, H. O., Vågerö, D., Koupilová, I., Mohsen, R., Berglund, L., Lithell, U.-B., & McKeigue, P. M.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-07-25
Volume
317
Issue
7153
Pages
241-245
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1976466322
Cited by
807
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 36
FWCI
26.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (9322050)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
fetal growth rate, birth weight, ischemic heart disease mortality, cardiovascular disease, birth weight for gestational age, fetal origins of adult disease, socioeconomic confounding, sex differences, life course
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Birth Weight, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review