Cited by 550Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesOptimal Experimental Design Methods

Treatment allocation by minimisation

Open access
Altman, Douglas G, Bland, J Martin·2005·BMJ

Abstract

In almost all controlled trials treatments are allocated by randomisation. Blocking and stratification can be used to ensure balance between groups in size and patient characteristics. But stratified randomisation using several variables is not effective in small trials. The only widely acceptable alternative approach is minimisation, a method of ensuring excellent balance between groups for several prognostic factors, even in small samples. With minimisation the treatment allocated to the next participant enrolled in the trial depends (wholly or partly) on the characteristics of those participants already enrolled. The aim is that each allocation should minimise the imbalance across multiple factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Altman DG, Bland JM. How to randomise. BMJ 1999;319:703-4.
  2. Buyse M, McEntegart D. Achieving balance in clinical trials: an unbalanced view from the European regulators. Applied Clin Trials 2004;13:36-40.
  3. Day S. Commentary: Treatment allocation by the method of minimisation. BMJ 1999;319:947-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-04-07
Volume
330
Issue
7495
Pages
843
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2122588058
Cited by
550
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Keywords
minimization, treatment allocation, blocking, prognostic factors, small trials, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Random Allocation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review