Cited by 74Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

An Evaluation of a Working Memory Training Scheme in Older Adults

Open access
McAvinue, Laura P., Golemme, Mara, Castorina, Marco, Tatti, Elisa, Pigni, Francesca M., Salomone, Simona, Brennan, Sabina, Robertson, Ian H.·2013·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Working memory is a cognitive process that is particularly vulnerable to decline with age. The current study sought to evaluate the efficacy of a working memory training scheme in improving memory in a group of older adults. A 5-week online training scheme was designed to provide training in the main components of Baddeley's (2000) working memory model, namely auditory and visuospatial short-term and working memory. A group of older adults aged between 64 and 79 were randomly assigned to a trainee (n = 19) or control (n = 17) group, with trainees engaging in the adaptive training scheme and controls engaging in a non-adaptive version of the program. Before and after training and at 3- and 6-month follow-up sessions, trainees and controls were asked to complete measures of short-term and working memory, long-term episodic memory, subjective ratings of memory, and attention and achievement of goals set at the beginning of training. The results provided evidence of an expansion of auditory short-term memory span, which was maintained 6 months later, and transfer to long-term episodic memory but no evidence of improvement in working memory capacity per se. A serendipitous and intriguing finding of a relationship between time spent training, psychological stress, and training gains provided further insight into individual differences in training gains in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00020

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No transfer effects were observed in 3 out of 8 studies, and only nearest transfer effects as measured with digit span forward and/or backward were observed by three other studies.

    “Critically, no transfer effects were observed in 3 out of 8 studies [72–74], and only nearest transfer effects as measured with digit span forward and/or backward were observed by three other studies [19, 75, 76].”

    From Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging (2022) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Results (page not supplied) report improvement on Digit Span Forwards, but also significant post-training improvement in immediate and delayed word recall. The Discussion (page not supplied) explicitly calls the word-recall findings evidence of transfer to episodic memory, contrary to the claim that this study observed only nearest transfer. The word-recall gains were not maintained at follow-up. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Park D. C. (2000). “The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function,” in Cognitive Aging: A Primer, eds Park D. C. Schwarz N. (Hove: Psychology Press), 3– 21
  2. Wilson B. Greenfield E. Clare L. Baddeley A. Cockburn J. Watson P. (2008). Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test – Third Edition (RBMT-3). San Antonio: Pearson

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAvinue, L. P., Golemme, M., Castorina, M., Tatti, E., Pigni, F. M., Salomone, S., Brennan, S., & Robertson, I. H.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
McAvinue, Laura P.
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
5
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168731245
Cited by
74
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
working memory training, older adults, cognitive aging, auditory short-term memory, visuospatial working memory, episodic memory, transfer of training, adaptive training, psychological stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review