Cited by 193Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Maternal adiposity—a determinant of perinatal and offspring outcomes?

Lawlor, Debbie A., Relton, Caroline, Sattar, Naveed, Nelson, Scott M.·2012·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

Experimental and animal data suggest that maternal obesity during pregnancy adversely affects offspring health in the short-term and the long-term. Whether these effects occur in humans and influence population health is less clear. This Review explores evidence from intervention studies and observational studies that have used designs (such as family-based comparisons and Mendelian randomization) that might help improve understanding of the causal effects of maternal obesity in humans. Collectively, human studies provide evidence that maternal overweight and obesity is causally related to pregnancy complications, increased offspring weight and adiposity at birth, and the difficulties associated with delivery of large-for-gestational-age infants. The underlying mechanisms for these effects probably involve maternal and fetal dysregulation of glucose, insulin, lipid and amino acid metabolism. Some evidence exists that extreme maternal obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)) is causally related to a long-term increase in offspring adiposity, but further exploration of this relationship is needed. High gestational weight gain may result in a long-term increase in offspring adiposity if women are already overweight or have obesity at the start of pregnancy. To date, little high-quality human evidence exists that any of these effects are mediated by epigenetic mechanisms, but approaches to appropriately test this possibility are being developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2012.176

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal obesity is linked to cognitive dysfunction, immune alterations, and elevated cancer-related mortality in the offspring.

    “Maternal obesity has additionally been linked to cognitive dysfunction, immune alterations, and elevated cancer-related mortality in the offspring.”
  • Increased adiposity in offspring can explain the relationship between high maternal BMI and increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases.

    “Increased adiposity in offspring can explain the relationship between high maternal BMI and increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases [73,74,75].”
  • Maternal obesity can adversely impact newborn body composition and adiposity, which are related to adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, higher cancer morbidity, and an increased mortality ratio in general.

    “Maternal obesity can have an adverse impact on newborn body composition and adiposity, which are related to adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, higher cancer morbidity and an increased mortality ratio in general.”
  • Maternal obesity is associated with adverse outcomes for offspring long-term health.

    “It is well established that maternal obesity is associated with adverse outcomes for offspring long-term health.”
  • The developmental overnutrition hypothesis suggests that greater maternal adiposity, and associated greater maternal circulating glucose and other nutrients, overfeed the developing fetus resulting in greater birthweight and adiposity throughout life.

    “The ‘developmental overnutrition hypothesis’ suggests that greater maternal adiposity, and associated greater maternal circulating glucose and other nutrients, overfeed the developing fetus resulting in greater birthweight and adiposity throughout life.23,24”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawlor, D. A., Relton, C., Sattar, N., & Nelson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Centre for Life (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Lawlor, Debbie A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
679-688
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W1976542144
Cited by
192
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
maternal obesity, maternal adiposity, gestational weight gain, perinatal outcomes, offspring adiposity, offspring weight, large for gestational age, pregnancy complications, epigenetic mechanisms, fetal metabolism, Mendelian randomization, causal effects
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Welfare, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Perinatal Care, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review