Cited by 31Treatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychological interventions, and their combination for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a network meta-analysis

Open access
Zhou, Xinyu, Cipriani, Andrea, Zhang, Yuqing, Cuijpers, Pim, Hetrick, Sarah E, Weisz, John R, Pu, Juncai, Giovane, Cinzia Del +7 more·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Depressive disorder is common in children and adolescents, with important consequences and serious impairments in terms of personal and social functioning. While both pharmacological and psychological interventions have been shown to be effective, there is still uncertainty about the balance between these and what treatment strategy should be preferred in clinical practice. Therefore, we aim to compare and rank in a network meta-analysis (NMA) the commonly used psychological, pharmacological and combined interventions for depressive disorder in children and adolescents. Methods and analysis: We will update the literature search of two previous NMAs for the identification of trials of antidepressant and psychotherapy alone for depressive disorder in children and adolescents. For identification of trials of combination interventions, seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LiLACS) will be searched from date of inception. We will also search ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and check relevant reports on the US Food and Drug Administration website for unpublished data. Building on our previous findings in the field, we will include any commonly prescribed oral antidepressants and any manualised or structured psychotherapies, as well as their combinations. Randomised controlled trials assessing any active intervention against active comparator or pill placebo/psychological controls in acute treatment for depressive disorder in children and adolescents will be included. The primary outcomes will be efficacy (mean change in depressive symptoms), and acceptability of treatment (dropout rate due to any cause). The secondary outcomes will be remission rate, tolerability of treatment (dropouts for adverse events), as well as suicide-related outcomes (suicidal behaviour or ideation). We will perform Bayesian NMAs for all relative outcome measures. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Dissemination: This NMA will provide the most up to date and clinically useful information about the comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychological intervention and their combination in the acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder. This is the newest NMA and therefore these results are very important in terms of evidence-based medicine. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42015020841.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016608

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Depression in Children and Young People: identification and management in primary, community and secondary car. British Psychological Society 2005 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56425/ (accessed 20 Jan 2017). 21834190
  2. [53]Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 163– 71. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016 20688472 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, X., Cipriani, A., Zhang, Y., Cuijpers, P., Hetrick, S. E., Weisz, J. R., Pu, J., Giovane, C. D., Furukawa, T. A., Barth, J., Coghill, D., Leucht, S., Yang, L., Ravindran, A. V., & Xie, P.
Affiliations
  • The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Department of Health Promotion and Human Behaviour, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Xie, Peng
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e016608
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743730445
Cited by
31
References
47
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depressive disorders, children and adolescents, antidepressants, psychotherapy, combination therapy, treatment efficacy, treatment acceptability, dropout rates, remission, adverse events, acute treatment
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Network Meta-Analysis, Adolescent, Antidepressive Agents, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review