Cited by 123Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Uncritical positive regard? Issues in the efficacy and safety of psychotherapy

Open access
Nutt, David J., Sharpe, Michael·2008·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The recent review of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) by the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) and the Food and Drug Administration was occasioned by media concerns about the safety of this class of antidepressant. In much of the prior and subsequent reporting of this issue, two assumptions have consistently been aired. The first is that psychotherapy is equally effective as drugs and the second is that since psychotherapy is not a drug, it is necessarily safer than drug treatments. From these two assumptions emerges a common presumption that psychotherapy should be the preferred approach for many if not most cases of depressive and anxiety disorders. But is this true? And if not, what implications does it have for the management of the new therapists that will soon be employed following the UK government’s award of £150 m for psychotherapy services in depression and anxiety? (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pressparliament/pressreleases2006/ pr955.aspx)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881107086283

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nutt, D. J., & Sharpe, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Nutt, David J.
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2007-08-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
3-6
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2168965962
Cited by
123
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychotherapy efficacy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, depression, anxiety disorders, psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy, positive regard
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychotherapy, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review