Cited by 647Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 21 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level

Open access

Abstract

Objective: It is evident that the gut microbiota and factors that influence its composition and activity effect human metabolic, immunological and developmental processes. We previously reported that extreme physical activity with associated dietary adaptations, such as that pursued by professional athletes, is associated with changes in faecal microbial diversity and composition relative to that of individuals with a more sedentary lifestyle. Here we address the impact of these factors on the functionality/metabolic activity of the microbiota which reveals even greater separation between exercise and a more sedentary state. Design: Metabolic phenotyping and functional metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiome of professional international rugby union players (n=40) and controls (n=46) was carried out and results were correlated with lifestyle parameters and clinical measurements (eg, dietary habit and serum creatine kinase, respectively). Results: Athletes had relative increases in pathways (eg, amino acid and antibiotic biosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism) and faecal metabolites (eg, microbial produced short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetate, propionate and butyrate) associated with enhanced muscle turnover (fitness) and overall health when compared with control groups. Conclusions: Differences in faecal microbiota between athletes and sedentary controls show even greater separation at the metagenomic and metabolomic than at compositional levels and provide added insight into the diet–exercise–gut microbiota paradigm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313627

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

42 Own result · 14 Not checked yet · 5 Own interpretation · 4 No basis given · 2 Own method

Verify all 21 references — free account

Show all 40 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 21
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
27 of 27
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The control participants are representative of a more sedentary lifestyle than the athletes.

    “The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 582

Metadata

Authors
Barton, W., Penney, N. C., Cronin, O., Garcia-Perez, I., Molloy, M. G., Holmes, E., Shanahan, F., Cotter, P. D., & O'Sullivan, O.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • National University of Ireland (IE)
  • Section of Biomolecular Medicine, Division of Computational Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
Corresponding author
Shanahan, Fergus
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-03-30
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
625-633
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2597526148
Cited by
647
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (11/PI/1137, 13/SIRG/2160, SFI/12/RC/2273)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, professional athletes, rugby union players, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, microbial metabolic functions, short-chain fatty acids, fecal metabolites, amino acid biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, antibiotic biosynthesis, serum creatine kinase, functional metagenomics
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Feces, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review