Cited by 36Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in normotensive women with Turner’s syndrome

Open access
Andersen, N H, Hjerrild, B E, Sørensen, K, Pedersen, E M, Stochholm, K, Gormsen, L C, Hørlyck, A, Christiansen, J S +1 more·2006·Heart

Abstract

Objective A qualitative study performed with a cross-sectional survey to report staff perceptions on emergency department (ED) communication while trialling a personal hands-free wireless communication device (WCD) between August and October 2008 in a busy inner city ED. Method A survey of all Royal London Hospital ED staff was conducted pre and post-implementation of a personal WCD. The survey included responses to occupation, experience, communication modes, communication wait times, perceived interruptions at the bedside and general perceptions of communication efficiency. Results No appreciable change in communication modes or perceived waiting times was reported No increase in bedside interruptions were reported. An overwhelming number of respondents considered the system had contributed significantly to improving the quality of the work environment, patient safety and care. Conclusion This study correlated with others showing a very strong perception of improved communication and working environment: less noise, better handovers and improved staff resource use. The study adds to the limited number of published trials examining WCD in health care. Observational reports post-implementation were overwhelmingly positive. Quantitative studies measuring the impact on patient flow, safety and cost benefits should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.2005.081471

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Left ventricular hypertrophy and increased ventricular mass are commonly observed in TS, even in those who do not have a diagnosis of hypertension.

    “Left ventricular hypertrophy and increased ventricular mass are commonly observed in TS, even in those who do not have a diagnosis of hypertension.460,461”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, N. H., Hjerrild, B. E., Sørensen, K., Pedersen, E. M., Stochholm, K., Gormsen, L. C., Hørlyck, A., Christiansen, J. S., & Gravholt, C. H.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Gravholt, C H
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-09-14
Volume
92
Issue
10
Pages
1516-1517
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2137618904
Cited by
36
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
Turner syndrome, subclinical left ventricular dysfunction, normotensive women, women's cardiovascular health, left ventricular function
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Turner Syndrome, Echocardiography, Doppler, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review